http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/a50...b427e1ff10.jpg
8.89pts
FX-8320 (1301PGN) 1.565v in BIOS
Crosshair V Formula
Samsung CH9
Seidon 240M + Liquid Pro
Printable View
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/a50...b427e1ff10.jpg
8.89pts
FX-8320 (1301PGN) 1.565v in BIOS
Crosshair V Formula
Samsung CH9
Seidon 240M + Liquid Pro
not bad Olivion :), how do you like Vishera in practice?
CPU is quite slow and consumes a lot of power but it's fun (most important), I love overclocking and I will maybe try dice with this Vishera.
try running the OpenGL benchmark in 32 bit I got about 10-15% higher FPS then I did in 64 bit O.O!Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
not slow in practice, in handbrake is in my experience quicker than Ivy i7 :) and in many next practice use is the same +-. So Im happy for this...OF course, some situation in reviews are not ideal, but practice use is other story :).
For every day usage, 2.5 years old 2600K is better and consumes lot less power when OCed.
But FX-8320 is cheap. I paid 130 euros for it and there is a reason why the price is so low -> Product in not really competitive, sell bad -> Only way to fight : Low prices
nice score :)!
hi all, little update with my new 9590:
http://www.nexthardware.com/forum/ga..._-_5000mhz.jpg
cooling system is what?
Watercooling with custom loop. Wb Ek Supreme Hf and xspc radiator :--)
Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 usando Tapatalk 4
Hi guys I'm new here but wanted to post up a couple scores
FX-6350 6.85 @ 5263 http://hwbot.org/submission/2420832_
Attachment 131277
FX-8350 9.57 @ 5533 http://hwbot.org/submission/2420286_
Attachment 131278
http://hwbot.org/user/johan45
Wow 5,5 ghz is very good! But what cooling are you using? Water? And what ambient and cpu temp?
Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 usando Tapatalk 4
Ya it's a homade loop probably around 20c that day for ambients. Can't wait till winter!! V_Core around 1.75
Little update at 5300 mhz:
http://www.nexthardware.com/forum/ga..._UH_1.5375.jpg
very nice...U can write some FX-9590 user review in new thread
Very nice I'm impressed with the V_Core on those things. They really cherry picked them, didn't they?Quote:
Originally Posted by Satanello
Sempron 145 5320mhz @ 1.696V on LN2
Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD7 f10
1.55 pts
http://imageshack.us/scaled/thumb/812/xgqh.jpghttp://imageshack.us/scaled/thumb/189/rl80.jpghttp://imageshack.us/scaled/thumb/42/bfb7.jpg
http://hwbot.org/submission/2425306_...45_1.55_points
Yes i can try, it will be my first review :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
Yes vcore is good but the problem for me is only temp. At this frequency i reach 65? on the cores during Cinebench.Quote:
Originally Posted by Johan45
I can't imagine your cpu at 1, 7v ........... was there a vulcan in you case?
Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 usando Tapatalk 4
Attachment 131305
stock after new installation.
Specs on signature.
sorry.. but i had to do this ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Johan45
1090T 6.97 @ 4108
http://abload.de/thumb/cinebenchamdqful8.jpg
real men use real cores!
that?s what amd was saying a few years ago...
Quote:
Originally Posted by siouxxx
Those are some nice boints :up:
Ya I know but it's like apples and cherries, plus that was the first run on that chip I'm sure I can improve it maybe not enough in a race though. That's why those chips still bring in $$ if you can find one.Quote:
Originally Posted by MadDias
Thanks!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Johan45
No Vulcans just a few Klingon's :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Satanello
But I bench on a Banchetto 101 not in a box.
FX-9590 1.475V, 5116 MHz warmup...cooling: AMD All in one liquid.
[IMG]xxxxx[/IMG]
edit// wrong screenshot, not Cinebench, but superpi :D /old one deleted)
srry, wrong link
http://i.imgur.com/WjsuKO0.png
I have to ask, if that is a stable voltage at that clock or not. Or were you just doing some benches??Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
I was this close to getting your validation with the 8350 on water the other day had 5750 but my file was corrupt so I had to settle With this. http://valid.canardpc.com/vwlzfy
The reason I asked about stability is I picked up a 9370 the other day and could run P95 at 4.8 with 1.428 v but it kinda fell apart after that. Haven't had a whole lot of play time with it yet.
Focus at this thread :).... More information will coming in next days. But no, this is not stable, only for this benchmark. Normal ambients.
What the hell is this chip?!...
http://i.imgur.com/At2GJQE.png
I did one at 5400 too
Attachment 131412
FX-9590 1.535V 5371 MHz Cinebench R11.5, allinone cooler AMD
http://i.imgur.com/2hhfEAi.png
Nice that is a really sweet chip you have there, FlanK3r. Too bad you can't keep it.
small update with R11.5
http://i.imgur.com/UaH9zF6.png
nice run!! 7.5 just screaming
Thanks man, was looking at your UCbench, what instruction set is XOP? Seems to be the most efficient for Vishera.Quote:
Originally Posted by Johan45
Ya XOP doesn't pop up in the drop down menu, I select SSE2 or what ever and in the command line change it to XOP. Run 2 tests I do 40 and 64. 64 is the most efficient but you'll get a slightly better score if you run 2 tests versus just the 64 thread test.Quote:
Originally Posted by l0ud_sil3nc3
So what is the actual command you enter?Quote:
Originally Posted by Johan45
Gimme a sec I'm not on my system but will look up a sub so I can show you.Quote:
Originally Posted by l0ud_sil3nc3
Attachment 131819
Go to the advanced a nd select instruction type (sse2) and threads, then close. The command line appears in the box. Just delete the SSE2r and type in XOP then run should work.
new trick for me Johan. Nice tip!
The XOP instructions really kick the Intels around too. Get's you some great scores
^
Yep you're crazy
EDIT: Y u no black out more
HT Ref - 242.8
Multi - 31 or 31.5
CPU freq - 7527 or 7650 :)
So which one is it?Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
Unless you found some efficiency I'm betting the faster one :DQuote:
Originally Posted by l0ud_sil3nc3
CPUNB @ 3884?
enough trolololQuote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
http://i.imgur.com/4EDKWs7.jpg
very nice man :). Very good chip it seems...Did you tested max Superpi at this? With the ebst core unit? It could be run 8 GHz Superpi :)
Might be dead lol, board is now hanging on 50 with dram led on so will have to test with another board.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
lol :). Hope CPU is OK :)
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/5c4...455aee8efe.jpg
My modest score :D
Congratz l0ud_sil3nc3 ! Impressive scores on the FX thing :up:
http://i.imgur.com/5pSnfjZ.png
A8-5600K stock :)
quick 4300 MHz A8-5600K
http://i.imgur.com/Cx2j2ZL.png
New one, A10-6800B 4633 MHz, air cooled (AHCI :-/)
http://i.imgur.com/qxtK6K9.png
A10-7850K
http://i.imgur.com/VVjo4xN.png
Wow looks like those new APUs take a pretty good kick in the pants to get the clocks up. Comparing those last two subs any way.
yes, IPC is really better. In R15 its not so big gain, but there is it, in some next benchmarks and practice test is again more than 10% clock to clock. And some people still dont believe about much better IPC with Kaveri :down:(section of news in XS). Called it bulls*ts
Most anytjing I've read has shown improvements, just needs some L3, 4 more cores and 942 pins to make me :)
FX-9370 @ 7551MHz
2x2GB G.SKILL Trident (PSC) @ 1329 8-12-8-26 2T
Asus Crosshair V Formula
13.05 pts
http://i.imgur.com/PlpYcOql.jpg
Maximum for my first retail 9590s in normal ambients and cooling:
http://i.imgur.com/tGIDJdK.png
Athlon 5150 (Kabini) OC at 2303 MHz
http://i.imgur.com/Aj5DHz3.png
Wow! That's quite high base clock resulting in nice CPU clock!
Kudos to you FlanK3r!
Here's results from my cobbled together dual Opteron 8439SE system (Tyan S2927E motherboard - 2 x "Istanbul" = 12 K10 cores).
http://za.hwbot.org/image/1149878.jpg
http://valid.canardpc.com/8i03hb
link to watch the run:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azFQCnvds0E
nice CPU system! Its possible some OC with FSB?
Back a few months ago when i was putting it together (and running XP) and testing, i used nTune to bring it up past 3.05 Ghz (by upping the bus speed past the stock 200) and saw 4.9 seconds in wPrime 32M (stock runs 5.266s).
These processors are locked (both max voltage and multiplier), and the Tyan BIOS really has no options for overclocking either since its a server board, so you have to use 3rd party software to do it. i haven't run across any software that works under Win 7 yet however (perhaps someone can recommend something - and i'll give it a go). The nVidia MCP55s usually get a bit unstable above 215 or so from what i have read (and in addition you are overclocking everything) as well.
i think it is very interesting that 12 K10 cores at 2.8 Ghz are only about 4% behind the 6c/12t i7-3930K at 3.2 Ghz... kind of shows that the old K10 core were not too bad.
i'd like to build either an 8 way Istanbul system, or a 4 way socket G34 setup soon... currently researching and collecting parts. Anyone with an 4/8 way Istanbul or 4 way G34 setup run cinebench yet? Would be interesting.
what maybe try ntune in windows 7 and run it as "XP SP3 mode"?:shrug:
The Virtual Machine won't pass the necessary information...Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
MCP55 was also the codename for nForce 570-590 chipsets, which do 300+ HT Reference Clock easy.
nTune had perfect support with the 500 series chipsets on Desktop but quick Google search shows it spotty for nForce Professional boards.
From the NVIDIA website, NVIDIA System Tools has droped MCP55 support but I'm pretty sure I used a version of nTune 5.x on Vista that should work with Windows 7.
i've heard of a few people setting registers via the smbus, but if you have a link to nTune 5.x that would be great. Truth be told, i kind of haven't felt the need to overclock since my old Cyrix 6x86 days. One thing i love about these multi processor setups is that i can have ultimate stability (ECC memory, server grade boards, etc.) and lots of speed by just adding more processors. i'll see if i can find nTune 5.x and give it a go.
[edit] - looks like someone got nTune working under win 7:
http://forums.amd.com/forum/messagev...hreadid=126705
i did find a version of nTune that works with Win7... link to it here:
http://www.nvidia.com/content/Driver...=us&type=Other
i ran bus speed up in increments of 1 until 215 and stopped at a speed of ~3.009 Ghz (14x215) = 7.5% overclock.
Result is here:
http://i1166.photobucket.com/albums/...9.jpg~original
video of 10.49 run (same settings as above 215 x 14.0 = 3.01 Ghz:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuAoC4fBPNY
Athlon 5350 Kabini @ 2688MHz
2.73
http://i.imgur.com/3FL75pUl.jpg
How do you like this little chip? I think its the best AMD CPU 2013/2014 :)
Cinebench'd AMD FX-8350 Running @ Stock 4.0GHz :up:
http://i.imgur.com/MAa4HYq.png
Cinebench'd AMD FX-8350 Running @ 4.8GHz
http://i.imgur.com/YRPqsmU.png
Cinebench'd AMD FX-8350 Running @ 5.0GHz ON AIR CLUB
http://i.imgur.com/ZLiZMIm.png
Cinebench'd AMD FX-8350 Running MAXXXED @ 4.6GHz (The Primeable for 72hrs. with No Errors ON AIR CLUB)
http://i.imgur.com/Was9CyA.png
Cinebench'd AMD FX-8350 Running MAXXXED OC @ 5.2GHz ON AIR CLUB
http://i.imgur.com/f3dBsjF.png
seems very good batch...1.5 V and 5217 MHz is good :). My best 8350s ending at 5240 MHz with 1.55V....
Thank you, FlanK3r. Your OC's are also VERY impressive and your last few posts about the 9590 are what inspired me to try for 5.0GHz. Because...Yah! Honestly, my knees were knocking even setting the Multiplier that high. I thought for sure it wouldn't even stay in windows over 5GHz with only Air Cooling, let alone 4.8. AMD has proven me wrong, again. Best CPU I've ever owned for $150 range. I took a Barton Core XP3200+ to about 3.0GHz on Air over ten years ago, that processor blew my socks off at the time. I am now proud to say I've had a Computer with over a 5GHz clock. It isn't stable at 5GHz but I did at least get to run Cinebench. It also doesn't seem to crash doing general :banana::banana::banana::banana: @ 5GHz like surfing the web or playing a flash game. I can't get it to Prime for more than a minute without the BSofD, though. Any tips for getting it stable @ 5.0 ish...I am going to be adding Cool Labs Liquid Ultra TMI when it arrives here in a few days.
I really like it.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
However, I killed my SSD while running the system at 134 FSB.
It might be a coincidence, but be careful. Not sure if PCI-E is tied to FSB again, but most probably - yes.
This ssd had been running numerous times at 130+ PCI-E on other platforms (e.g. DFI 790FXB-M2RSH), but died shortly on this one.
ufff, good to know it. I tested with classic HDD 5150 Athlon and I had some issues with booting with high BCLK wall (sometimes no post, sometimes OK to Windows)
Latest Cinebench 11.5 results... for my Quad Opty home machine... did some BIOS tuning:
16.86
http://i1166.photobucket.com/albums/...ps631d9a3f.png
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7H-H2-b1T1o
Setup is SuperMicro quad opteron motherboard, populated with 2 Opteron 6180SE (2.5 GHz, 12 cores each = 24 cores total).
http://i1166.photobucket.com/albums/...psd8bebf61.jpg
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3914/...17020e00_c.jpg
FX-8370E 5238 MHz 9.04b
FX-8370 5243 MHz 9.05 points
https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2943/...070fef0d_c.jpg
My 2009 vintage Dual Opteron 8439SE clock at 3.262 GHz. 11.06 points
http://hwbot.org/image/1263417.jpg
Just updated my "Quad Opty" project machine tonight with 4 ES chips (unlocked multiplier and voltage).
Here's the baseline with 4 x Opteron 61xx ES chips running at 2.1 Ghz: 26.83
http://hwbot.org/image/1266544.jpg
video of run:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvXk...ature=youtu.be
Really nice score!
Have you played with OC, yet ?
hi Felix,
Thanks :)
i pulled the two 6180SEs that i had in there and installed these yesterday, so i thought i would take a baseline. These ES chips are unlocked for both voltage and clock multiplier so i'll be running them at 3.0 GHz... as soon as i get to that (probably this weekend) i will most certainly do another Cinebench 11.5 run.
Waiting for the rest of monstrosity to unleash....
Hi Felix,
i probably will up things to 2.5 over the weekend now that i think about it... (same stock speed as the 6180SEs that were in there). The reason being that the two dynatrons that are running on top of the upper two processors are probably not up to snuff for 3 GHz. Need to pick up another two Noctua coolers for that. Its an interesting and fun project.
Had some time to spend seeing how well these 4 chips would run at 1.1v. They didn't like 2.8 GHz but run at 2.6 GHz completely stable... didn't want to up the voltage or frequency beyond that because i am still using two stockish coolers on the top two processors... hope you folks like the results as much as i did:
32.78
http://hwbot.org/image/1267214.jpg
hi felix, i see you are just as shocked as i was... the ridiculous thing is that these things can be taken up to 1.55 volts i think... and i know they are all capable of 3.0 GHz. Power consumption wasn't too bad given that the motherboard was throwing 124.8 GHz at the problem... it ran around 660 watts. The things ran very cool as well. i think low 40Cs range on the ones cooled by the Noctuas. A bit shocking to me to say the least.
Fun pic i took just after installing them:
http://i1166.photobucket.com/albums/...ps38ccafb7.jpg
Latest update for my Quad Opty rig: Up to 2.6 Ghz ran fine on stock voltage of 1.1. Tried running 2.7 GHz on stock voltage... no go... so bumped it to 1.125v and it ran fine up to 2.8 GHz. 2.9 Ghz required a bump to 1.15v. 3.0 Ghz required another bump to 1.175v. Everything is stable. It seems that AMD really outdid themselves with these Magny Cours chips. Wattage during these Cinebench runs was around 920 or there abouts for the 3.0 GHz runs. i really think this has more in it, but we are talking well over 1000w... probably closer to 1100w at full bore... which is a bit crazy if you ask me for a home PC. In addition the SuperMicro PSU is only rated for 1400w...
The score for 3.0 Ghz: 37.21
http://hwbot.org/image/1267519.jpg
wow man!
Hi Flank3r, same thoughts as me :D
if you would like watch a run... i uploaded it to Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p47cJijwfmc
At some point i will try for 3.1 and 3.2 GHz... by upping the voltage a bit, and i did get a run in at 3.1 but it wasn't stable... but it was drawing 1025 watts from the wall... so i thought i should probably stop for now. Hope folks enjoy the vid (was a bit tired when i made it but that is the way it rolls)...
This is the highest my FX will go.
A run @ 5350 Mhz - Score 9.09
http://image.noelshack.com/minis/201...80-r11-5-2.png
5400 Mhz isn't achievable. Perhaps with a room temperature of 10C or less ...
very good 8320 chip. Try this run againg with high priority for better score :)
Thanks for the advice. It does help :)Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
Here is a run @ 5375 Mhz - Score 9.23
Room temp while benching was 17C. Nearly achieved a 5400 Mhz run, but Cinebench freezed near completion.
http://image.noelshack.com/minis/201...09-r11-5-2.png
very nice results, awesome man :).The cooling system?
I have a highend watercooling. Completely custom.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
Pump : Aquastream XT Ultra. This pump is quiet, powerful and compared to other pumps it only consumes 4-5 watts. Less heat transferred to the water.
Radiator : Mora 3 with 4 180mm fans. Probably the best radiator out there.
Waterblock : Koolance 380A. Bought it a few days ago, but doesn't do much better than my old NexXxos.
My R290 is also watercooled.
The fact is, many here would do better than my FX 8320. When you delid the CPU, you can expect an improvement of 50 to 100 Mhz.
So my chip is above average, but the new FX that came out should do better if delidded.
What is the temperature outside your room ?
Yesterday, it was 10-12C. Today even less, more like 8-9CQuote:
Originally Posted by felix_w
If your tubing is long enough you can leave the rad outside, so the tubing passes through a small gap of the door/window
This is how my setup is, actually, but permanent. I have a Phobya 1080 with D5 placed outside and i guided the tubing through the outer wall into the room...
You can gain a 7-8C difference and still not freeze yourself :D