1.) Which mainboard?
2.) What cpu temp?
3.) Nice, i´m trying to get a fx53 too to replace my fx51 ;) (can you get me a retail one fast? ;))
Printable View
1.) Which mainboard?
2.) What cpu temp?
3.) Nice, i´m trying to get a fx53 too to replace my fx51 ;) (can you get me a retail one fast? ;))
Mobo is SK8N cpu temp is very variable.
#1 ORB 9700Pro with a non Pro
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/WChampion.JPG
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/29Sec.JPG
HOLY SH|T THOSE COLORS ARE KILLING ME!
i love this colors ;)
what mobo for oc an a64 3200 ?now i have an abit kv8 max3 but it's not lock pci agp :s
AN50R for poweroverclocker's who wants more than 3,5 to vdimm
or gigabyte K8NPRO for soft OC.
Ok, Now that I have a Decent Overclock to show.. Time to post it:
Shuttle AN50R with Vdimm and Vcore Mods
Athlon64 3200+ (CAAAC 0345SPMW)
OCZ PC3200 Plat LE (2x256mb) @ 2-2-2-5 @ 3.6V Vdimm, 5:4
Prometia Mach I (no Mods) for Cooling.
3.6V for 220MHz ????
way too much voltage man...
edit: forgot my manners, nice clock, :)
Too Lazy to Take the Vdimm Down whem I was Running 1:1 ;)Quote:
Originally posted by RootX
3.6V for 220MHz ????
way too much voltage man...
edit: forgot my manners, nice clock, :)
Hi guys!
I just got my gigabyte K8N non-pro todya because my Shuttle An50R was sick :( Well, is this K8N a very bad overclocker or what? I cant get it stable at 2200MHz... I've tried all kind of vcore selection in bios...
Whats wrong`?
I dont know if its the mobo there's seeing the wrong kin of volts from my PSU, because MBM5 says that:
Core 0: 1.49v
Core 1: 2.52v
+3.33 : 3.22v
+5.00 : 2.85v
+12.00: 11.19v
They are very lower than they were on my shuttle :s
Could a bios update be the solution?
well your 5 v is a joke...
just 2.85v where it is supposed to be around 4.82v
its must be your PSU
No, it is'nt my PSU... On my shuttle an50r it was around the 4.85v
It is your settings in MBM5, when I change something in my settings my voltages act the same way...
Okay... But is the K8N mobo a bad overclocker? Because i can't get it stable at 2200mhz... even at 1.7vcore
Are you clocking throug BIOS or using ClockGen..?
I have heard that the K8N has problems when trying to boot with more that 230Mhz FSB, could be that problem you are running in to..
I have set vcore to 1.700v, LDT to x2.5 and chipset and vdimm to +0.3v in bios and booting up at 210x10...
Increasing fsb with clockgen to 220, and even there it is not stable at all!
Damn... I dont know what to do`?
it's not a bad board. it is a well known good overclocker. it does have some quirks but then again they just about all do these days with us doing all the beta testing.
Have i done anything wrong since it wont get stable?
My 5v line is like that too guess it must be the board.
I posted a couple of weeks back about my oc and someone wanted to know the codes on my chip finally got around to fitting my watercooling setup so here they are.
ada3200aep5ap
caamc 0347vpmw
9359625k30176
I've gained a small oc from using water gone from 2260mhz to 2328 mhz stable. 1.7v, my psu seems very bad so i think thats holding me back. Im 44C full load 29 idle.
i think my shuttle AN50R is dead too
anyone know if the a64 3200+'s from newegg being shipped out now are CG stepping or still C0 stepping?
i know the mobile ones are CG just wanted to see if the nonmobile ones were as well.
hello, I can't beat 265 1/1 with my k8n pro and my 3000+ . however I bench stable A 320 of fsb with the RAM in desynchro 166. my RAM is A-data 4000 .
same results with 2,6v or 2,9v 265 stable but not anymore
now i can do 8,5x280 synchro 1:1 with a litle gain of performance.Quote:
Originally posted by tooning
hello, I can't beat 265 1/1 with my k8n pro and my 3000+ . however I bench stable A 320 of fsb with the RAM in desynchro 166. my RAM is A-data 4000 .
same results with 2,6v or 2,9v 265 stable but not anymore
i can beat 4x320 in synchro 1:1
why i can't do more than 280 with a cpu frequency near 2400mhz ?
the X8 multiplicator seems to work bad , but with 7,5 multiplicator it's the same : can't reach 280 .
actually the best combo for me is 8,5x280 , it give me the best performance but i want a litlle more .
:stick:
edit: i know the memory isn't running at 280 when i set a x.5 muliplicator , it run at 266mhz
whats this?Quote:
Originally posted by tooning
edit: i know the memory isn't running at 280 when i set a x.5 muliplicator , it run at 266mhz
my rig does better at 3dmark using 8.5x327 166 ratio than 9x309 166 ratio.
Does this 266 MHz effect only come into play for 1:1 ratio
no it's a problem when you use half multiplier .Quote:
Originally posted by CodeRed
whats this?
my rig does better at 3dmark using 8.5x327 166 ratio than 9x309 166 ratio.
Does this 266 MHz effect only come into play for 1:1 ratio
look at this :
The memory divider is another thing which requires study with this motherboard. In the BIOS there are options for 200, 166, 150, 133, and 100MHz memory buses when HTT is 200MHz. These function normally, but a second divider gets introduced when the CPU is using a half-multiplier, like 7.5x. Since the memory controller is onboard the CPU, memory speed is based directly off of the CPU speed. When using a half multiplier, the RAM will behave as if the multiplier is actually the one half a step higher. The math for determining the memory speed becomes somewhat complicated. In all honesty the best course of action is to use ClockGen or CPU-Z to find the memory frequency, they have the detection method built in. Looking at the memory tab in CPU-Z which shows the divider being used is especially helpful in understanding.
http://www.ocfaq.com/reviews/Gigabyte/K8NPro/5
ok, i have more info :Quote:
Originally posted by tooning
no it's a problem when you use half multiplier .
look at this :
The memory divider is another thing which requires study with this motherboard. In the BIOS there are options for 200, 166, 150, 133, and 100MHz memory buses when HTT is 200MHz. These function normally, but a second divider gets introduced when the CPU is using a half-multiplier, like 7.5x. Since the memory controller is onboard the CPU, memory speed is based directly off of the CPU speed. When using a half multiplier, the RAM will behave as if the multiplier is actually the one half a step higher. The math for determining the memory speed becomes somewhat complicated. In all honesty the best course of action is to use ClockGen or CPU-Z to find the memory frequency, they have the detection method built in. Looking at the memory tab in CPU-Z which shows the divider being used is especially helpful in understanding.
http://www.ocfaq.com/reviews/Gigabyte/K8NPro/5
it's a problem when you use half multiplier AND 1:1 ratio
this problem not exist when you use half multiplier and an asynchronous ratio ;)
Complicated is an overstatement. All you need to do is divide the FSB(HTT) with the multi + .5 and divide by the actuall multi.Quote:
Originally posted by tooning
no it's a problem when you use half multiplier .
look at this :
The memory divider is another thing which requires study with this motherboard. In the BIOS there are options for 200, 166, 150, 133, and 100MHz memory buses when HTT is 200MHz. These function normally, but a second divider gets introduced when the CPU is using a half-multiplier, like 7.5x. Since the memory controller is onboard the CPU, memory speed is based directly off of the CPU speed. When using a half multiplier, the RAM will behave as if the multiplier is actually the one half a step higher. The math for determining the memory speed becomes somewhat complicated. In all honesty the best course of action is to use ClockGen or CPU-Z to find the memory frequency, they have the detection method built in. Looking at the memory tab in CPU-Z which shows the divider being used is especially helpful in understanding.
http://www.ocfaq.com/reviews/Gigabyte/K8NPro/5
IE.
280*9.5 - 280/10*9.5 = 266Mhz
or
300*7.5 - 300/8*7,5 = 281Mhz
CPU-Z does not show the ram-speed correct when using half multis, nor does Clockgen.
Atleast not here with the newest versions.. :)
yes it's true : i'n my case it's :Quote:
Originally posted by Formann
Complicated is an overstatement. All you need to do is divide the FSB(HTT) with the multi + .5 and divide by the actuall multi.
IE.
280*9.5 - 280/10*9.5 = 266Mhz
or
300*7.5 - 300/8*7,5 = 281Mhz
CPU-Z does not show the ram-speed correct when using half multis, nor does Clockgen.
Atleast not here with the newest versions.. :)
8.5x282/9 = 266
thanks, now its clearQuote:
Originally posted by Formann
Complicated is an overstatement. All you need to do is divide the FSB(HTT) with the multi + .5 and divide by the actuall multi.
IE.
280*9.5 - 280/10*9.5 = 266Mhz
or
300*7.5 - 300/8*7,5 = 281Mhz
CPU-Z does not show the ram-speed correct when using half multis, nor does Clockgen.
Atleast not here with the newest versions.. :)
so 1:1 uses integral memory dividers
for me it doesnt matter anyway since I have to use the 166 ratio (mem is limited to 267 MHz @ 3.6V)
the memory controller of my 3400+ is dead---> rma :mad:
I tired of this... I'm sending the K8N back and get my money back and sending the AN50R to Sweden and get it repaired (If i can find the warranty proof?)Quote:
Originally posted by lil old me
My 5v line is like that too guess it must be the board.
I tried setting the voltage in mbm settings to 'GA-8KNXP' for my k8n mbm now reads my 5v as 5.06. My 12v reading also went up a bit.Quote:
Originally posted by K32A
I tired of this... I'm sending the K8N back and get my money back and sending the AN50R to Sweden and get it repaired (If i can find the warranty proof?)
Well, i did also try that, but it did'nt help either :( - I think that i just have to wait getting my AN50R back :(
Not sure if you can see in pic but its:
A64 3400+ @ 2.75ghz
Gigabyte K8NPro
KHX3200 BH-5 @ 2-2-2-6
CPU/14
1.7vcore/2.95vdimm/2.95vddq
Still plenty of headroom imho. Board is completely stock. WIll be doing mods soon!
3dmark stable 24/7 gaming rig
SuperPi 1M 34Sec
http://a7.cpimg.com/image/39/75/3171...-02000199-.jpg
Heres my new mem chip :) looking good :) Its a HyperX PC3000, do you know if its a BH5 or BH6 ?
Running in 2.5-2-2-5, I cant run CL2 if i use 1:1.. just if i use 200mhz option in BIOS btw.
http://home.no.net/geek:banana::bana...asd/261mhz.JPG
What cooling? Very good clocks at 1.7v :)Quote:
Originally posted by CrashOv3r1De
Not sure if you can see in pic but its:
A64 3400+ @ 2.75ghz
Gigabyte K8NPro
KHX3200 BH-5 @ 2-2-2-6
CPU/14
1.7vcore/2.95vdimm/2.95vddq
Still plenty of headroom imho. Board is completely stock. WIll be doing mods soon!
3dmark stable 24/7 gaming rig
SuperPi 1M 34Sec
http://a7.cpimg.com/image/39/75/3171...-02000199-.jpg
CG core is wonderful:)
M/B: ASUS SK8V / BIOS: 1002.019
CPU: Athlon64 FX-53 CAABC 0410MPMW
CPU Cooling: Liquid Nitrogen
Memory: Corsair CMX512RE-PC3200LLPT(CH-5) 512MB x4
VGA: Quadro2Pro(AGP, GeForce2Ultra-modded)
HDD: IBM DTLA-307015
Power suplly: Zippy-460W
Vcore: 1.987V, Vddr: 3.350V, Vio: 3.550V
OS: Windows Server 2003
MEM: 2:1(DDR400)-CL2.0-7-14-2-2-1-5-2
SuperPI 104man(=1M): 25sec
very impressive kyosen :D
yea that rips kyosen. don't suppose you've got a radeon handy?
nice synced busses.
edit: if it wasn't via. doh
A64 3200+ 0330
2.5ghz
34sec :)
watercooling
http://home.no.net/geek:banana::bana.../asd/34sec.JPG
nVentiv Mach2 "stock"Quote:
Originally posted by Orak
What cooling? Very good clocks at 1.7v :)
This setup is screaming for a vmod. I have to run the memory at 166 to get 2.7ghz I cant even do 220fsb @ 1:1 with 2.95v :(
speed up and get some mods dude :) you realy need it asapQuote:
Originally posted by CrashOv3r1De
nVentiv Mach2 "stock"
This setup is screaming for a vmod. I have to run the memory at 166 to get 2.7ghz I cant even do 220fsb @ 1:1 with 2.95v :(
Got another one a few days ago.. was hoping for a CG chip, but no.
A64 3200+
0351 CAAOC
"9"..160
Cooled by a Vapo PE.. poor thing.
Stable? It was.. now its acting up on me. It refuses to run nature in 01 at more than 2650. I also suspect my AN50R to be the sinner here, cause I can no longer run 270HTT with 2.5LTD. Have to run 2x.
http://privat.bluezone.no/forman/images/32sekpi.JPG
Tell me please, does anyone own a CG-revision of A64?
I was watching this thread and it seems that everyone have C0.
Whats the stock vcore/vdimm/vdd voltages on the shuttle? Any other 64 boards that have the vdimm option to 3.3? thanks :)Quote:
Originally posted by misteroadster
AN50R for poweroverclocker's who wants more than 3,5 to vdimm
or gigabyte K8NPRO for soft OC.
The stock vDimm voltages on the Shuttle is; 2,6v, 2,7v, 2,8v and 2,9v...
The vCore is from someplace under 1v to 1,7v and the vdd I can't remember - but it is something like max 1,8v or so...
at 1.725v
ownage
http://jason57.iwarp.com/3ghz.JPG
Holy crap.. at only 1.72v ?!?!Quote:
Originally posted by paul007
at 1.725v
ownage
Whats your water and cpu temp?
Nice chip you´ve got there, and of course nice OC :)
thanks is chilled ethanol and it is "VERY" cool.. down below -65c
cpu temp during all benching never dropped below -28c in bios ;) botto0m of block maintained a load temp of -56c wish I had access to a 20k VR for the vmod today as I think i could have pulled off some 3100mhz benches :)
more to follow and opf course 3d and a top spot on the 3dmark orb :)
PLEASE answer my question. ANYBODY.
Tell me please, does anyone own a CG-revision of A64?
I was watching this thread and it seems that everyone have C0.
I think all fx53's are CG's if so ask OPP or XMAN they both ahve these chips.
I'm not talking aboun FX. I'm asking about Athlon64 (No FX).
ahh well then out of the 100 forums I vist I have not seen one :(
paul007 hmm..... I looked at this: http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/cont...docs/25759.pdf
and found out that there're A64 CG.
oh yeah there has been but I dont know when there are going to start shipping :(
so paul where are your ownage 3d benches ;)
stock 9800xt was dishish out in the 24.5-25k+ region the rest you all have to wait for till I get the card cooling on and have the time to vmod the 9800xt and so on..Quote:
so paul where are your ownage 3d benches
Gaurt. 30k ;)
I might aswell publish my currently OC result - not maxed out yet..!!
CPU is a 3000+ CAATC 0350XPMW
http://img21.photobucket.com/albums/...ing/250x10.jpg
This is 112% stable and for everyday use - at only 47°c full load with watercooling...
I need to do the vCore mod to get much higher as my board maxes at 1,7v.....
Anyway there will be more from me later on, as I will convince myself about trying with 1,7v in vCore.... :rolleyes:
I'm doing a SuperPI in 39sec. on 2400MHz with 200MHz on RAM, is that okey or is it too slow?
(1M ;))
39s for a 2400 A64 is not good. But them what are the timings on your mem? You should be seing around 36s with decent timings or higher clocks. I got 35s with 2.6g and mem at 3-4-4-7 at 270FSB
Edit: Sorry not 2.6G but rather 2.46G
http://www.planetmars.co.za/forums/u...1079392372.jpg
anybody going to try the New Athlon64 2800+??
Yeah I`d like to. I saw a review a few days ago that showed it faster than the 3X00+`s in memory bandwidth.
Its a bit slow yes, what timings do you run ?Quote:
Originally posted by K32A
I'm doing a SuperPI in 39sec. on 2400MHz with 200MHz on RAM, is that okey or is it too slow?
(1M ;))
i got 35sec with 2500mhz and 227mhz on my mem. 2-2-2-5.
And my record is 34sec with2500mhz and 250mhz on my mem. 2.5-2-2-5 :)
I think it is because i'm only running 200MHz on my mem. and auto timings?
http://modorama.by.ru/overclocking/268_2cpu.png
http://modorama.by.ru/overclocking/268_2mem.png
Here's what I got.
Zalman 7000CU on CPU.
3.6V on memory
Albatron k8x800 proII mobo
Swiftech cooling soon
Look at the memory timings. It's not photoshop. Memory is OCZ premier series - the cheapest memory from OCZ.
Good god. That`s pretty amazing stuff 2PiZzA! If you EVER want to sell your mem I`ll buy!
This mem did only 217 2-2-2-5 with vmod on p4c800-e deluxe.
It's funkin weird. I just can't believe it.
Oh, Lord. Look what I did with air cooling.
http://modorama.by.ru/overclocking/2560.png
Hehe, printscreen stable ? :)Quote:
Originally posted by 2PiZzA
Oh, Lord. Look what I did with air cooling.
http://modorama.by.ru/overclocking/2560.png
Not going to last long with 1.9v!! :eek:
1.9v is not a problem. Gonna vmod mobo for higher vcore.
It's realy printscreen stable. But if you look at http://www.vr-zone.com/ocdb/search.php , my a64 is the fastest 3200+ with air cooling. With the highest FSB and memclk.
but 2464MHz = 260x9.5 @ 1.8VDC is absolutely stable. With 2-2-2-5 mem timings in synchro.
I think these do :D
Some results that luihed got :eek:
http://www3.telus.net/luis99/292
:eek:
http://www3.telus.net/luis99/335c
Bennah 335MHz? you mean that's 670MHz DDR? or it's photoshop?
If that is`nt a Photoshop job then it`s the best BH5/6 I`ve ever seen. What system was this on and is that a buffered or unbuffered score?
PiZza we think alike (u just type faster than me) :)
andyddr My split keyboard helps me a lot doing that. :)
Now my Super_Pi is on 36 sec. - It's good with some faster RAM :)
http://keza.port5.com/Super_pi!.JPG
K32A Not bad. Increase VCore. You'll get higher clocks.
I got 35 sec. It's maximum on air.
2PiZza I can't increase the vcore with out a mod. And i'm sending the motherboard in to get it fixed at the place where I bought it. There's some small problems when i update windows... What do tou think my RAM can run at 2.9v ? And with what cas.?
with my second 3400+ I get 2460MHz rock stable at 1.4v
it is worst than the first
Is that bad :| At 1.4vcore?
K32A It's nice. pretty nice.
yes and 2700 at 1.63vQuote:
Originally posted by K32A
Is that bad :| At 1.4vcore?
cpulloverclock Someday I gonna change may 3200+ on 3400+ or 3700+ or whatever.
Update. Got 2580 at 1.92. Screenshot stable. :)
Yea it is not a PS job. Its a real result that he got.Quote:
Originally posted by 2PiZzA
Bennah 335MHz? you mean that's 670MHz DDR? or it's photoshop?
But using the A64 meant that it was'nt a real 335MHz, its a little lower I think.
macci posted somewhere on these forums, showing how you can work it out, but I cant find it now :(
I think his rig was
A64 3200+ (waterchilled)
AN50R
KHX3200
Pretty decent isnt it :)
Anyway, you're all using nforce3 and i'm using k8t800. THat's a big difference. So there're no problems with fake clocks.
Quote:
Originally posted by 2PiZzA
1.9v is not a problem. Gonna vmod mobo for higher vcore.
It's realy printscreen stable. But if you look at http://www.vr-zone.com/ocdb/search.php , my a64 is the fastest 3200+ with air cooling. With the highest FSB and memclk.
but 2464MHz = 260x9.5 @ 1.8VDC is absolutely stable. With 2-2-2-5 mem timings in synchro.
nono, your memory runs with 260 / 10 * 9.5 = 247MHz :toast:
SKYNET This works on Nforce3. I've just tried 257*10 - no problems. But my CPU cannot work at higher frequncies.
So it's definately not 'bout me.
So thats how ya work out the mem speed :)Quote:
Originally posted by SKYNET
nono, your memory runs with 260 / 10 * 9.5 = 247MHz :toast:
FSB / 10 x Multi = Mem Speed :)
:toast:
I got my garden hose directly connected to my watercooling now :D results later :)
this is the lowest frequency for 37s with my K8n pro
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/37s...JPG
it's promising cpull ;)
this is my best Superpi 1M with my 0338 UPMW 3200+ and BH-5 KHX3200
K8Npro Vcore moded , mod Vio=Vddr 3,36V
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/31s.JPG
I was testing FX53 Vs 3200+ for a french site.
The test will be online monday :
www.think-hardware.com
As you'll can see a 3200+ at 260X10 is most powerfull than FX53 overclocked to 13X200.
Very interresting , do you know ? don't forget the 3200's bandwith is very lower at 260FSb 1:1 than FX at 200.
For PC mark2004 i think my windows was crashed.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadste...00-2600mhz.JPG
what bios did you use ?Quote:
Originally posted by cpulloverclock
this is the lowest frequency for 37s with my K8n pro
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/37s...JPG
A little unfair IMO. Fx53 has higher mem timings and lower FSB. Obvious that it would come second. But the fact that it still beats 3200+ in some tests show`s it`s a better chip.Quote:
Originally posted by misteroadster
I was testing FX53 Vs 3200+ for a french site.
The test will be online monday :
www.think-hardware.com
As you'll can see a 3200+ at 260X10 is most powerfull than FX53 overclocked to 13X200.
Very interresting , do you know ?
For PC mark2004 i think my windows was crashed.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadste...00-2600mhz.JPG
F11 in 16-7-2-2-5-2-2-1-3 I believeQuote:
Originally posted by Orak
what bios did you use ?
I can get 36s at 2280-2288MHZ with a better fsb
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/36s.JPG