edit= fixed URL
http://www.ocworkbench.com/ocwbcgi/n...5853615,58623,,
Everything keeps coming back to the old ol 865s and 875s huh? :)
edit= fixed URL
http://www.ocworkbench.com/ocwbcgi/n...5853615,58623,,
Everything keeps coming back to the old ol 865s and 875s huh? :)
Intel must have really F'd up 915/925/945/955 if this is really the case.
maybe asus will make a 478>775 socket adapter now for the p4p boards :D
ROFL......:DQuote:
Originally Posted by ibby
Well, at least it has pci-e and ddr2 support :)
I wonder if ASUS P5P800SE would support conroe aswell?
They probably did that so users with DDR can get in on the act. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by cupholder2.0
that would be bonkers!Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoig
the word ownage comes to mind :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Dave DEF
:D :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
:toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by ibby
all I know is that the Rev 1 had another VRM than intel's standard specification sheet for intel chips. so perhaps it had the newer already installed... same goes for the 775i65PE. so we might see conroe support here too.
peace
but this card uses the ATi Xpress 200 intel edition,, not i865G ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by cupholder2.0
No, the correct link is this: http://www.ocworkbench.com/ocwbcgi/n...5671352,37752,
Some guys can't paste a damn. :D
And no, it supports neither DDR2, nor PCI-E. I kindly ask the IT-dummy guys that know poo about chipsets and sockets to STFU.
That picture is photo chopped from the looks of it.
When has any mobo maker ever silk screened the code name of a CPU on a board? :rolleyes:
If indeed this is true , i still would stay away from these boards. They will be exremely FSB limited with Conroe
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyderOCZ
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Showim...board+-+Retail
Aparently they do this on most of their boards.:p:
http://www.asrock.com/product/775i65GV.htm Asrock does for alot of their Intel boards, its on their website.Quote:
Originally Posted by RyderOCZ
That one says Prescott, I stand corrected. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by vapb400
I still think the one in Caligula's post looks chopped ;)
The image on ASRock's site is different.Quote:
Originally Posted by RyderOCZ
Edit: now it has changed. Should have saved the original.
:rolleyes: what kind of ignorance is this? must be some seriously sad people out there
Dang that sucks. I had my faith on bluetooth!!Quote:
Originally Posted by VulgarHandle
I never said that Bluetooth edited the photo. He is innocent. Please don't accuse him.
I *think* that what happened is that ASRock didn't have an up to date product photo of the real board (which actually exists) so they had to photoshop one for the press release.
This is all speculation on my part.
No one accused YOU of a fake. Your either paranoid or insecure about this issue.