Linked below
The numbers seem very low and it reports for the incorrect processor type of Power PC.
suggestions?
Stats might be different, still less than 24 hours of crunching.
Printable View
Linked below
The numbers seem very low and it reports for the incorrect processor type of Power PC.
suggestions?
Stats might be different, still less than 24 hours of crunching.
#rs are way low for a mac fugger. there are 2 macs on page 1 of the fastest rigs and they have some sick bench scores. Maybe you can email them and see what they are doing.Quote:
Originally Posted by FUGGER
Fugger: Is this running as a mac or as a Intel? IE: OS10 or XP?
LOL, it's such a crossbreed that I don't know where to start to troubleshoot?:confused:
OSX with x86 processor
Then I'll bug out..What I know about macs you could fit in a thimble and not notice when you stuck in your finger!;)
Those benchs are horrible though..My old P3 xeon 700 does better..not much but better..
dunno where this path will lead you, but I found some optimized mac clients out there....
http://members.dslextreme.com/~reade...boincbeta.html
Thanks, going to compile the Darwin x86
Because rosetta is being run through rosetta ;) The original OS X rosetta client is for PPC. With x86 CPU BIONC is run through apples rosetta program which allows PPC coded apps to run on x86 CPUs.
Ok, fixed. I messed up the first bench bur it scores 6k / 14k now
Sec for screen, setting up multiple.
yeah, AFI's got it....R@H is running through Rosetta and getting translated--SLOWLY.
EDIT: DAYUM--6k/14k PER CORE?
Wow, that was fast FUGGER....
Nice to know that I could help :toast:
It is the correct version as I am on Darwin and x86
New bench attached, working attacing to the project. The first time you start the CLI it runs the bench, scored much higher.
Gimme a few more, ill reboot and reload boinc
Fugger: try running the bench 3 times back to back..my Dx3600 was benching horrible, tried the 3 times deal and upped my bench by almost 100%..from a 12000 total wet/dry to 21,000 wet dry combined..the rosetta bench is the issue..all over the chart..and if you get a good bench, immediately go and do the manual update as thats what the scores are derived from..Good Luck!
whoa
Will try, thanks
those #'s you have above..they make a combined # of over 38,000...
wet and dry times the # of cpu's..38000 as far as I know is higher than anything I've seen in Rosetta except FCG's dual 285.. LOL, you may not want to rebench that beast! :slobber:
your looking at a machine that should score 2000 a day in rosetta..maybe a little more.
Omg those scores are great. What exactly are you running? 2.16hgz Yonah dc with mac os x?
So a 3ghz yonah on xp might produce quite good too.
It's an open source project by Apple, so others can try it too for free if they want. It's OSX *nix without the GUI. Not sure about drivers and such.
http://opendarwin.org/en/news/darwin801.html
Nice numbers dude. :)
Could it be just the yonah making such huge numbers, or could it be the mac architecture/os?? Either way, those are great scors. Anyone got some numbers for the old PPC Macs? I remember someone on the D2OL team had a G5 mac if I remember correctly.
Totals:Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
14420 Whetstones
43916 Dhrystones
Combined: 58336
teehee....20K lead...safe for now :p:
2Ghz T7200 Merom
Enjoy the early numbers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by freecableguy
looks like Fugger is closing in :D
42,000 combined with Meron @ 2ghz
38,000 combined with Yonah @ 2.16ghz
so roughly 19% clock for clock difference between the two
I should have switched to faster ram, could have gained me a lot more points.
Lets see if the Windows client is faster :D