catylyst 6.2officials comparison

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

02-10-2006, 12:52 AM
chew*

catylyst 6.2officials comparison

Both cards are using stock clocks with settings on performance in CCC

x1800 xt 6.1 officials.........3876 3d06
x1800 xt 6.2 officials.........4073 3d06

same clocks same performance settings....with a single core 3700+ @ 2.5 gig

x1900 xt 6.2 beta's.........5935 3d06
x1900 xt 6.2 officials.......5937 3d06

same clocks same performance settings....with a dual core x2 3800 @ 3.0 gig

I deleted my score with the drivers that came on disk with the vidcard but i think the x1900xt scored 5663 with them at same settings.
02-10-2006, 01:57 AM
eva2000

what about x1800xt 6.2beta vs 6.2 official ? :)
02-10-2006, 02:58 AM
Viss

These 6.2 might help getting me 5k & 12k single core.

146@3300
X1800XT stock
cat6.1 vs cat6.2

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...oc/cat61-2.jpg
02-10-2006, 03:37 AM
Lane-k

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

what about x1800xt 6.2beta vs 6.2 official ? :)

I can give you i have bench yesterday for see the difference for tweaks r us

Here the screen of the bench, driver 6.2 (official release), 752/900, i have not keep score of stock clock with beta, so OC:
http://img323.imageshack.us/img323/5329/627ju.png

And the comparison score with the beta 6.2: 4'916http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=117191

beta 6.2 VS official:

Score..... 4916 ------ 4912
SM 2.0 :.. 2251 ------ 2246
SM 3.0 :.. 2253 ------ 2254

CPU.... :...1144 ------ 1144
02-10-2006, 05:52 AM
cantankerous

hmmm with my card at CCC max 689/792 I score 4973 in 06 which my cpu at only 2.48ghz and single core to boot. You should be getting much higher than 4912 for your gpu speed being higher.
02-10-2006, 06:19 AM
spajdr

Quote:

Originally Posted by cantankerous

hmmm with my card at CCC max 689/792 I score 4973 in 06 which my cpu at only 2.48ghz and single core to boot. You should be getting much higher than 4912 for your gpu speed being higher.

dont think so mate, its X1800XT .. not X1900 :)
02-10-2006, 07:38 AM
cantankerous

doh! Sorry, wasn't paying attention on that part.
02-10-2006, 08:01 AM
K.I.T.T.

Any improvement on the X8xx series?
02-10-2006, 08:10 AM
deathman20

Mine went up about ~300 points for my X1800XL. Scoring 4617 (621/688.5) now from 4340 (which was using 625/730)

That was going from 6.1's to 6.2's.
02-10-2006, 10:05 AM
chew*

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

what about x1800xt 6.2beta vs 6.2 official ? :)

had a problem trying to use them eva.....
02-10-2006, 10:06 AM
chew*

Quote:

Originally Posted by loc.o

These 6.2 might help getting me 5k & 12k single core.

146@3300
X1800XT stock
cat6.1 vs cat6.2

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...oc/cat61-2.jpg

Hmm your scores are way low........even for 6.1 cats........My sons cpu is only at 2.5.......and only loses 9 points to yours....and the memory timings on his are gross for a 1 gig kit..........
02-10-2006, 10:15 AM
deathman20

Quote:

Originally Posted by chew*

Hmm your scores are way low........even for 6.1 cats........My sons cpu is only at 2.5.......and only loses 9 points to yours....and the memory timings on his are gross for a 1 gig kit..........

But does your son have a Dual Core system or is it single core?

Truely I think his results are pretty much inline for a single core XT setup. With dual core be in the upper 4k's. I mean I have a XL and not totally near XT speeds but I score decently.
02-10-2006, 10:18 AM
dnottis

Using Opty 148 @ 3.0 Ghz, 2GB OCZ EB PC-4000 and DFI Ultra-D with X1900XTX.

With 6.2 Betas and 6.2 WHQL (after a system reformat) I scored EXACTLY the same in 3dm 06!!!! (max CCC 690/800)

http://www.3dxtreme.net/other/ontap/...X/3dmark05.jpg

3dmark 2005 -
http://www.3dxtreme.net/other/ontap/X1900XTX/3dm05.jpg

3dmark 2003 -
http://www.3dxtreme.net/other/ontap/...X/3dmark03.jpg
02-10-2006, 10:19 AM
Lane-k

- in case you verify my old post link... i have just updated right now at 759/900 6.2 official..
3D06: 4'939 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=119364
3D03: 20'923 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=4613327
Nice one thing is fine for what i look: this new X1900XT(X) seems really perform better at lower speed of a XT1800XT ( i m far have finish oc mine at his max level...)
02-10-2006, 11:44 AM
Viss

Quote:

Originally Posted by chew*

Hmm your scores are way low........even for 6.1 cats........My sons cpu is only at 2.5.......and only loses 9 points to yours....and the memory timings on his are gross for a 1 gig kit..........

Both were done on me daily/gaming HDD no tweaks at all. For single core & stock X1800XT this really aint that low.... I couldnt get the 6.2b to work either.
02-10-2006, 12:31 PM
chew*

Quote:

Originally Posted by deathman20

But does your son have a Dual Core system or is it single core?

Truely I think his results are pretty much inline for a single core XT setup. With dual core be in the upper 4k's. I mean I have a XL and not totally near XT speeds but I score decently.

read first post.....I clearly state its single core
02-10-2006, 12:47 PM
eva2000

well this is what my 6.2 betas do for my X1800XT on a mild clock

3dmark06
@810/963 = 5,914
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=119666

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...4_5914_tnn.jpg

@810/981 = 5,930
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=119726

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...1_5930_tnn.jpg

6.2beta vs 5.13 at near same clocks
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...0vs5472_tn.jpg
02-10-2006, 01:50 PM
krampak

I've got the same results with Catalyst 6.1 at 739/868Mhz on my X1800XT than with the 6.2 Official at 720/850Mhz :) (same configuration).
02-10-2006, 05:13 PM
Viss

same CCC settings simular clocks

6.1
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...c/4844cat6.jpg

6.2
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...c/3d06cat6.jpg

compare
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...oc/compare.jpg
02-10-2006, 05:27 PM
Hicks

Dammmm, these Drivers kick ass for the X1800XT. Can't wait to try these babies out.

Gonna fit me VJ cooler/sinks 2moro.:cool:
02-10-2006, 11:40 PM
eva2000

nice loc.o looks like big boost is in SM2.0 components
02-11-2006, 12:02 AM
Blacklash

Futuremark is letting me publish for my X1900 now.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=118362

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1792016

Before with the CD drivers I got 6,141 in 06 and 12,185 in 05. Now with the 6.2 driver it's 6,498 in 06 and 12,692 in 05. Card is at 702|850 in benches.
02-11-2006, 03:22 AM
K.I.T.T.

Quote:

Originally Posted by K.I.T.T.

Any improvement on the X8xx series?

:stick:
02-11-2006, 04:06 AM
eva2000

HIS X1800XT @810/963

official 6.2 = 5,916 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=121221

vs

6.2 beta = 5,914 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=119666

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...6vs5914_tn.jpg

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...916_62_tnn.jpg

Strange FM lists 6.2 as approved but my submission isn't FM approved yet guess they need to update the ORB again :)
02-11-2006, 06:02 AM
chew*

Looks like you got same result as me eva......but with the x1800xt.....lol 2 point increase with official. Odd.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 PM.

XtremeSystems