8RDA+ 3D Mark scores being deleted

Printable View

12-29-2002, 06:56 PM
glock19owner

8RDA+ 3D Mark scores being deleted

Ok, sue me if I posted this in the wrong subject thread :D

But I was wondering if any of the 8RDA+ users have been getting their 3D Mark scores deleted when posting above 220FSB.

I have emailed them a few times and still no reply. I just got through posting a thread asking why my 3D mark scores over 220FSB are getting deleted on there forum. Not sure if it will be deleted or not with them.

It's also not like my scores are well in the 20+k range either. All of my scores are between 9200 and 9600.

For all of you 8RDA+ owners that are running and publishing your scores over 220FSB. Check and make sure your scores are still posted and let me know if they are or if they have been deleted also.

Thanks, glock.
12-29-2002, 07:03 PM
RichBa5tard

My 8rda+ 3D mark score is still up. It's "only" at 200FSB though, not 220+

I can run at 230 async stable, perhaps i should give it a go and see whether if it gets deleted.

How many of your +220fsb scores have been deleted? It seems pretty strange they are targeting 9xxx scores... :s
12-29-2002, 07:12 PM
Caper

When benching at 236 fsb async I couldn´t even register the results.
Maybe just maybe they don´t think it´s possible to run benches at those fsb :)
12-29-2002, 07:16 PM
glock19owner

So far every one of my 220+ published marks have been deleted. I have made sure the stats are correct when publishing them also. The first couple of them, it wasn't reading the right CPU Mhz and only read as a NF, not a NF2. I can understand why they would be taken as fake. But not with the corrections I have made.

Kind of makes me affraid to publish my 10,000 (10,000 even) score I had with my 8KHA+ and my GF3 Ti200 now.
12-29-2002, 07:22 PM
glock19owner

Here is the thread I asked the same question over there.
12-29-2002, 07:56 PM
Bushboy

Seems a bit silly, do they think NF2 is not capable of such FSB while running their benchmark?

Also, gotta like that guy that wrote like a 3 paragraph reply in the FM forum about glocks and guns lol :p
12-29-2002, 11:31 PM
glock19owner

Quote:

Originally posted by Bushboy
Seems a bit silly, do they think NF2 is not capable of such FSB while running their benchmark?

Also, gotta like that guy that wrote like a 3 paragraph reply in the FM forum about glocks and guns lol :p

And never mentioned a damn thing that had to do with my thread subject...lol...

I will give it a few more days to see if someone can answer it over there or any of my emails. They said everyone is still on vaction for a few more days. I am going to benchmark some more and see what they do with them in the next few days and go from there.
12-29-2002, 11:34 PM
Bushboy

Er if they're all on vacation, then who's deleting the scores ;) Either way, I hope they put your scores back up, they should know it's legit.
12-29-2002, 11:42 PM
wicktron

It's some raving Intel fanatics jealous of the NF2's incredible speeds. :confused:
12-30-2002, 12:22 AM
Kunaak

that would really piss me off if they can just go around deleting score just cause they dont think it's possible.
12-30-2002, 02:20 AM
QuadDamage

yep, unfortunately madonion is Intel biased, i mean their mods. I don't think you'll get any reply fro m them as i had some probs with my asus nf2/ti4200 myself, i kept on mailing them, but they didn't care.
12-30-2002, 06:42 AM
RichBa5tard

Which mainstream benching proc is *not* intel biased? PC mark? Uh no. Sisoft sandra? Nuhu. Quake? Nope. Bapco sysmark? No comment...
12-30-2002, 06:50 AM
N8

Re: 8RDA+ 3D Mark scores being deleted

Quote:

Originally posted by glock19owner
Ok, sue me if I posted this in the wrong subject thread :D

Sued! :p

Nah, moved this to the less-clogged & a bit more appropriate 3D forum ;)
12-30-2002, 11:32 AM
spaceman

That sucks. :mad: I've been tryin' to get them to answer me as well, but it is the holiday season. :rolleyes: My 2400+ keeps getting read as a Duron, and now, since I installed DX9 and the Catalyst 3's, I can't even RUN 3DMark anymore. It says I need DX8.1. Re-installing 3DMark does nothing. I'm just hoping the rumors are true, about a 3DMark 2003, and that it works for us. ;)
12-30-2002, 11:41 AM
piercedandtatto

when is 3dmark 2003 supposed to comw out????
12-30-2002, 06:57 PM
Justintoxicated

Quote:

Originally posted by spaceman
That sucks. :mad: I've been tryin' to get them to answer me as well, but it is the holiday season. :rolleyes: My 2400+ keeps getting read as a Duron, and now, since I installed DX9 and the Catalyst 3's, I can't even RUN 3DMark anymore. It says I need DX8.1. Re-installing 3DMark does nothing. I'm just hoping the rumors are true, about a 3DMark 2003, and that it works for us. ;)

download the updated version of 3dmark2001se.

i was getting that error when i downloaded directx 9
12-30-2002, 07:13 PM
GreenBeret

Quote:

Originally posted by QuadDamage
yep, unfortunately madonion is Intel biased, i mean their mods. I don't think you'll get any reply fro m them as i had some probs with my asus nf2/ti4200 myself, i kept on mailing them, but they didn't care.

As much as I dislike the FM mods, you're wrong :p they have nothing to do with the ORB and they don't have any permission to access the ORB. A long time member like you should have know that. Obviously they will ignore you guys.

BUT..........having said that, the real guys in charge of the ORB are lazy bastards :p I know cos I've PMed and emailed them many times :p

It might just be a bug with the ORB :) Let's just wait for them to get off their fat bums and fix it. What else can we do ? :(
01-04-2003, 08:42 PM
STEvil

Post on the front page? 8-D

Give "publish saved result" a try..