Hi all you guys.... :toast:
We (here in Hellas) have "fixed" the Pi-fast V.4.3 (newer one) so as to be easy benchable
Just "click" on "thelab_pifast.bat" file ......
There you go ...Give it a try......
Printable View
Hi all you guys.... :toast:
We (here in Hellas) have "fixed" the Pi-fast V.4.3 (newer one) so as to be easy benchable
Just "click" on "thelab_pifast.bat" file ......
There you go ...Give it a try......
downloaded :)
Hi there eva2000......What's up my friend..... :)Quote:
Originally posted by eva2000
downloaded :)
I'm still playing with a pile of nice ram... while waiting on RMA for my X800Pro heh
OK ..Here's on of mine......:)
Pifast really hates prescotts :(
http://mbnet.fi/elixir/3.2E/Thelab-Pifast.PNG
Got once 33.94 (4660MHz), but it crashed when I opened paint :D
nice, but could u make it modifiable?
(like change values in a .bat file)
:toast:
The Stilt... xmm... your score is really weird :confused:
:confused:
Isnt this1 faster than the other 1??? If so then thats kinda bad as its a smaller differance...
But on my school comp i got 209.79 :D P3 933Mhz - 128 MB ram ;o)
Here's my result, P4 EE @ 4 Ghz
But if it's modifiable , then we couldn't have a standard one to compare!!!..........Quote:
Originally posted by nfin1te
nice, but could u make it modifiable?
(like change values in a .bat file)
what a difference in times from hexus pifast vs thelab pifast
2.8C @ 200fsb
AI7
2x 256MB KHX3200K2/512 @ 200mhz 2-2--26
NB Strap 800fsb
GAT = F1-A-A-D-D
hexus pifast = ~68s
thelab pifast = 46.16s!
It's because those Prescotts REALY don't like Pi-fast bench............I've seen it too.....Don't know why though....... :confused:Quote:
Originally posted by chrisbmw150
The Stilt... xmm... your score is really weird :confused:
BTW Nine overclock you've got there The Stilt with the Prescott.... :D
Those EE's are fast M8.........Dumn fast.......Mine's an EE too....... ;)Quote:
Originally posted by LarsK
Here's my result, P4 EE @ 4 Ghz
Hexus pi-fast is based on pi-fast V.4.1 (old one) and thelab's is based on the newer one(2003) pi-fast V.4.3 with some bugs fixed and I think that it can handle or recognise the newer instructions of nowdays CPU's like SSE2 for example...... ;)Quote:
Originally posted by eva2000
what a difference in times from hexus pifast vs thelab pifast
2.8C @ 200fsb
AI7
2x 256MB KHX3200K2/512 @ 200mhz 2-2--26
NB Strap 800fsb
GAT = F1-A-A-D-D
hexus pifast = ~68s
thelab pifast = 46.16s!
awesome anything that makes better use of our cpus is :cool: :)
2.8C SL6Z5
Abit AI7 17 bios
2x 256MB KHX3200K2/512 BH-5
old hexus pifast using v4.1 pifast = 51.39s
http://www.fileshosts.com/pentium4/D...fast_TEAED.jpg
newer thelab pifast using v4.3 pifast = 35.02s
http://www.fileshosts.com/pentium4/D...fast_TEAED.jpg
Yup, they sure are. Especially when compared to Northwoods and Prescotts clock for clock. I'm about to sell mine though, hoping to pick up a 3.4EE with better oc potential than this particular chip. I see from your results that the new stepping should be really good. I was lucky enough to pick up one of the last Mach II GT's (if not THE last one here in Denmark), so cooling it shouldn't be a huge problem :p:Quote:
Originally posted by hipro5
Those EE's are fast M8.........Dumn fast.......Mine's an EE too....... ;)
I did run the test @ 4115 Mhz (257 Mhz fsb), mem @ 5:4 but it was slower (32.45 vs. 32.23 @ 4 Ghz, mem @ 250 Mhz).
Hello Hipro:toast:
All of the EE aren't good overclockers.........I think it's because a. they have over 3 times the tranzistors than a normal one and b. that the L3 must work at 1:1 with the core even with higher latency than the L2...............Quote:
Originally posted by LarsK
Yup, they sure are. Especially when compared to Northwoods and Prescotts clock for clock. I'm about to sell mine though, hoping to pick up a 3.4EE with better oc potential than this particular chip. I see from your results that the new stepping should be really good. I was lucky enough to pick up one of the last Mach II GT's (if not THE last one here in Denmark), so cooling it shouldn't be a huge problem :p:
I did run the test @ 4115 Mhz (257 Mhz fsb), mem @ 5:4 but it was slower (32.45 vs. 32.23 @ 4 Ghz, mem @ 250 Mhz).