Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Review
Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Review
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...Ext4banner.jpg
Introduction
Many of you will probably be starting to become more familiar with Asrock. Not so long ago Asrock decided to delve into the Enthusiast arena offering some excellent choices such as the 890FX Deluxe3 and more recently the 890FX Deluxe5, P67 Extreme4 and P67 Extreme6. Today we will be looking at the latest offering from Asrock based on Intel’s Z68 chipset, the Z68 Extreme4.
Specification
Specs
Once again as with the Asrock P67 Extreme4 we see the Z68 Extreme4 not holding back or pulling any punches with full support for the entire line up of Intel Socket 1155 CPUs, 8 phase power delivery, XMP support, fully featured UEFI, full support for Intel’s on-die IGP, Lucid Virtu and 1080p Blue-Ray playback to name but a few of this boards features.
If you would like to learn more about the Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Asrock have even thoughtfully dedicated a small site where you can learn all about the board. You can visit that site Right Here.
Z68 Extreme4 Gallery
Taking a little creative license today I decided to head outdoors into the sunshine for the picture taking, let’s see what we have got.
Packaging & Accessories
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/Box3.jpg
Asrock are keeping with the familiar brushed steel look used with their P67 Extreme boards, and personally, I like it. It’s classy while remaining a little bit different and not being overstated and gaudy. Simple elegance, if you will. Let’s look at the rest of the gallery.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/Box2.jpg
Some might wonder why I included an image of the side of the box, the reason is simple, so people can rest assured their purchase is well protected.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/Box1.jpg
Here things get a little more interesting. Asrock have provided potential store buyers with all the information they should need to make an informed decision. There’s little in regard to marketing fluff with Asrock choosing to give potential buyers the information they need with a minimal of fuss, avoiding possible confusion for buyers.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...essories-1.jpg
The accessories bundled with the Z68 Extreme4;
Driver CD
Trial version of Media Espresso 6.5
IO plate
4x SATA cables (2x in each bag)
2x Molex to SATA splitters
User manual
Quick start guide
Leaflet on X-Fast
Dual GPU bridge
Leaflet about installing HDDs larger than 2TB
FDD cable
3.5mm audio cable
Rear USB 3.0 bracket
2 Port Front panel USB 3.0 panel
Also on the USB panel is a tray to attach a SSD drive to.
That’s quite the selection of accessories! The inclusion of a front panel USB 3.0 panel is easily the star highlight, saving you a good £15-20 compared to if you were to buy a front panel separately.
Mainboard protection & Close-ups
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...ket/Board1.jpg
Asrock have trumped their competition here in my opinion. It’s not often you see a board encased in foam protection AND a anti-static bag. Usually manufacturers tend to dump their product in the cheapest protective packaging they can so to see Asrock not cutting any corners here when trying to ensure the board reaches you in perfect condition is very nice to see.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...ket/Board2.jpg
Another shot of the Z68 Extreme4, minus the anti-static bag this time.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...t/Z68front.png
Here is the board herself. Sexy isn’t she? The blue, white and black colour scheme is a appealing one as again Asrock have gone for a simple approach that’s none the less elegant and would look beautiful no matter what colour LED fans or neon lights you might choose to pair it with.
Getting past the aesthetics of the Z68 we start to notice some of the board’s other fine touches, Power and Reset buttons, a Clear CMOS button, LED debug display, excellent expansion slot layout and extraordinarily beefed looking MOSFET heatsinks. We’ll test just how well those MOSFET heatsinks and PCH heatsink can deal with heat output a little later.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/IO.png
A typical good Z68 based IO panel with VGA, DVI, HDMI 1.4 and a convenient Clear CMOS button. The Display Port on this board can do 2560*1600 resolution.
Misc
For the more inquisitive of readers here are some close-ups of some of the Z68s more intimate parts.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...FETCPUarea.jpg
Clearance around the CPU area is good, great news for large heatsinks! You will also notice two sets of holes, one set is for Socket 775 coolers and the other set is for Socket 1155 / 1156 coolers. Some may argue two sets of holes is a bad idea as it increases trace length and weakens the integrity of the board around the CPU socket area. With the latter of those points you might have a fair argument if you were to use a stock Intel cooler, but as anyone using a board like the Z68 Extreme4 isn’t going to be using the stock Intel cooler instead having a nice 3rd party cooler with a support bracket there’s no cause for concern. It’s also worth mentioning that unlike many other cooling designs the MOSFET heatsinks are held in place with screws and not pushpins. The MOSFET heatsinks also have little “guides” where the screws go which really help prevent board warping when tightening the screws.
Don’t change this approach Asrock, you got it absolutely right.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/PCHHS.jpg
Here is the PCH (Platform Control Hub) heatsink. It’s unfortunate that it’s not a “real” heatsink with proper fins to dissipate heat but Asrock aren’t alone on this other manufacturers have done similar things. We will see just how this PCH heatsink does in the temperature test later on.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/PLX.jpg
This is the PLX chip. The chip adds extra PCI-E lanes ensuring bandwidth limitations doesn’t become a problem.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/Etron.jpg
Once again Asrock have opted to stay away from the NEC USB3 controller instead opting for the Etron EJ168A controller.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...et/buttons.jpg
Power and Reset buttons. Quality of the buttons is exactly what’s required, they are not flimsy and do the job they need to do nicely.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...et/DrDebug.jpg
This little LED display will certainly save a lot of time troubleshooting. I’ll take this opportunity to mention that the rather more expensive Asus P8Z68 Deluxe does not have any kind of debug display.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...et/Asmedia.jpg
Lastly, the Asmedia PCI-E to PCI bridge chip.
The UEFI
Just like with most P67 / Z68 boards, Asrock are using the new UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface). Think of the UEFI as the evolution to the legacy BIOS. It’s no more complicated to use and has some handy additions such as support for extremely large HDDs, the ability to use the mouse, screen capture (F12) and of course it’s much prettier to look at.
As most UEFI pages will be more or less identical board to board we will focus on the only pages where things can vary; OC Tweaker.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/1-6.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/2.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/3-1.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/4.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/5-1.jpg
Test setup
Today the test setup will be;
Asrock Z68 Extreme4, UEFI 1.4
Intel Core i5 2500K
2x2GB PC12800 G.Skill Ripjaws 7-8-7-25 1T
MSI GTX460 1GB 900 / 4300
Xonar DX 7.1
Western Digital Caviar Black 640GB 32MB cache
850W Corsair HX
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit SP1
Unlike many other reviews, testing will be conducted with the Z68 Extreme4 in a closed case environment to keep as close to real world conditions as possible.
AIDA64 - Stock Performance
Let’s see how the new Asrock Z68 Extreme4 stacks up against the Asrock P67 Extreme4.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...Photoworxx.jpg
There’s really nothing to separate the boards here.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...8-SinJulia.jpg
Another tight duel with the Z68 just edging the P67.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...lia-Mandel.jpg
Another marginal win for Z68.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/Zlib.jpg
There’s nothing between the chipsets here.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/AES.jpg
The P67 takes a bit of a demolishing here. How much you will notice these gains in the real world is another matter though.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...Write-Read.jpg
Another remarkably close battle.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...et/Latency.jpg
All square.
Well, after that bout the Z68 Extreme4 emerges the victor over the P67 Extreme4 but all of the tests are very tight with the exception of AES.
Lucid Virtu technology
Lucid Virtu is Lucidlogix’s answer to ever growing media performance demands and demands for a greener, less power consuming experience. The technology works on both integrated and discrete graphics. Quite possibly the biggest advantage for Virtu is when used on a Intel Z68 chipset with a i5 2500k or i7 2600k CPU for the ability to convert media files at blisteringly fast speed using the IGPU. Today we will test just how good the technology works converting a 1.7GB AVI media file with Media Espresso 6.5 to a Zune compatible format.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/Media.jpg
So what can we learn about Virtu here? If you are considering a 2500k with a factory overclocked GTX460 the GTX460 will likely be faster. However, there are some footnotes that come with these results. A GTX460 @ 900 / 4300 is only 18 seconds faster than the IGPU, this stands to show how well the IGPU works when converting media. A standard GTX460 (675 / 3600) won’t stand a chance in hell of catching the IGPU. The final footnote is the time of 6:18 with the IGPU at stock frequencies, boards such as the Z68 Extreme4 allow you to overclock the IGPU within the UEFI, this would unquestionably slingshot the IGPU ahead of even the factory overclocked GTX460.
Intel RST
Intel RST (Rapid Response Technology), is the big caveat which Intel is hoping will make everybody upgrade from their P67 to a Z68. The question is though what kind of additional performance does it offer and is it worth it? Well to find that out there’s only one thing to do; break out the benchmarks ;)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...t/compare3.jpg
Here are the results testing RST. Even though it was only an old 1.5TB HDD used with a SSD as you can see the performance improvements are really quite good and with better storage devices used with RST the performance will obviously go up.
X-Fast USB technology
X-Fast is Asrock developed to enhance USB transfer rates and times. We’ll test what kind of performance differences there are with and without this technology copying a total of 1.8GB of data consisting of smaller and larger files in the same transfer to a removable storage device from a WD Caviar Black.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...ket/X-Fast.jpg
Despite the principle of X-Fast most likely being as simple as reducing latency the technology unquestionably works very well and as can be seen here works very well with larger transfers, not just smaller ones.
MOSFET & PCH Heatsink Temperature Test
Most of you probably aren’t used to seeing something like this in a review. The aim is very simple – to test manufacturers mainboard cooling to see who really has effective cooling and who just has heatsinks designed for “bling”, because as we all should know, you want something that’s effective at doing the job not just there for show.
Testing is conducted using a temperature gun with laser pointer. The gun accuracy is +/- 2% so results are very precise.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...t/Fets-PCH.jpg
Temperatures here are not bad at all. However, the temperature measured for the PCH is disappointing. For a component that only operates with 1.051v and considering the side panel for the case was off to get these temperatures it’s quite easy to imagine the PCH heating up to 48-50c+ in a closed case which is quite hot given how little voltage the PCH uses.
The only other thing to note is temperature differences between the side MOSFETs and top MOSFETs. It would seem the top MOSFETs are being worked harder.
Overclocking
Just like P67 Z68 supports Overclocking for enthusiasts. The challenger will be the Asrock P67 Extreme4.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v187/bizket/OC-1.jpg
Here is the results. After no time at all I attained 4500MHz CPU @ 1.3v (load), 2133MHZ memory @ 1.65v, VTT @ 1.155v, CPU PLL @ 1.85v. Simply the most effortless overclock ever, it really doesn’t get any easier than this.
I’ll also add the system remained entirely stable with 1.29v (load) as well when vcore was reduced. Unfortunately I didn’t have time to test how low I could get the voltage and remain stable, but sub 1.3v for 4.5GHz is deffinately very good for this chip. With nothing to seperate the Z68 and P67 in the OC department, lets put them head to head once more with the same OC settings.
AIDA64 - OC Results
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...rxx-CPU-OC.jpg
As we see here both the Asrock P67 Extreme4 and Z68 Extreme4 have nothing to seperate them.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...injulia-OC.jpg
The Z68 pulls off a win by the thinnest of margins.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...-Mandel-OC.jpg
Again there is just a whisker in it with the Z68 oh so marginally coming in ahead of the P67.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...et/Zlib-OC.jpg
Another whisker win for the Z68.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...ket/AES-OC.jpg
The first solid win for Z68 in the OC tests.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...te-Read-OC.jpg
A photo finish, but the Z68 picks up the win.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...Latency-OC.jpg
Absolutely nothing to divide the two boards here, but that’s not something that can be considered a surprise given how close both performed through the Aida64 tests.
Conclusion
So it’s been a long day of testing and we’ve come to the end of testing an exciting new product from Asrock, but what should we be taking away with us? During my time in testing the Asrock Z68 Extreme4 proved itself to be very reliable, not once did it exhibit any early days teething problems due to the newness of the chipset and the performance is even a touch better than the already excellent performance of the P67 Extreme4. The UEFI of the Z68 is well laid out and I did not experience any bugs. The board itself has a exceptionally well thought out expansion slot arrangement, the MOSFET heatsinks are great, there’s plenty of SATA and USB ports, the board is gorgeous to look at, you get a Clear CMOS button, diagnostics LED, Power & Reset buttons on the board, and you are even given a 3.5” USB 3.0 bay. So, what’s not to like?
Despite all the positives there are a few minor (and I do mean minor) niggling issues. I had to think really hard to find anything wrong with this board at all. Firstly, there is only one ROM chip. This isn’t normally going to be a big concern but let’s say you are updating the UEFI and you get a power cut, you are then going to have to try and source a new ROM chip pre-flashed with a UEFI for your board, this potential scenario could easily be avoided if the board had a backup ROM chip, or even if Asrock simply gave a spare pre-flashed ROM chip in the box. Secondly there is the PCH heatsink. While it looks flashy it’s just not very efficient. Give me a good old fashioned low profile finned heatsink with a large base area any day.
Overall I have absolutely no hesitation of recommending the Z68 Extreme4 to anybody looking to build a new system regardless of if the user is an enthusiast looking to overclock or your average Joe looking for a solid, reliable system.
All thanks must be given to Asrock for supplying the Z68 Extreme4.
The Good
- Clear CMOS button
- Power & Reset buttons
- Debug LED display
- Plenty of SATA & USB ports
- Great MOSFET heatsinks
- Bug-free UEFI
- Lucid Virtu
- Overclocking is a doddle
- Display Port can do 2560*1600 resolution
The Bad
- PCH heatsink
- No dual ROM chips
