That seem not fake,
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/10abad1...20be09c0e1.jpg
link for more info
Printable View
That seem not fake,
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/10abad1...20be09c0e1.jpg
link for more info
if cpuz is struggle'n that hard to read the processor, we wont get a proper read out until cpuid modifies the program which wont be until dozer is out...fail
edit: don't be shy to resize your images dude
1GHz turbo... aggressive clocking:D
... i just hope the 1.4v is not right,cause that would be bad:(
the SB gets easily to 4.5ghz at lower than 1.4v
Why a 32bit OS as well? kinda weird.
Intersted cpuz can't even see how many cores this thing has.
Looking forward to a task manager performance window shot. ;)
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/0ec3e8f...d3fa5d6775.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by [XC] Synthetickiller
;)
http://tof.canardpc.com/preview2/0ec...d3fa5d6775.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Monkeywoman
More infos in AMD Zambezi thread too
I like the images to be big enough to read them though, but you can easily cut off all the surrounding desktop parts to make it smaller.
Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
6 core huh? I was hoping to see 8. :(
They need to release ASAP. I'd even consider an AM3+ system for my server 08 set up. More cores, the better.
*CLICK* I posted that image URL only, then he posted a "large thumb" clickable to the normal size image :shrug: it was there twice...Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavv
I am trying so hard not to upgrade, waiting for this.
Yup can't freakin wait any longer.......AMD better bring it with BD.
VCORE is irrelevant because of the different manufacturing tech.Quote:
Originally Posted by AAbenson
BTW, did you know that W=V*A? :)
Here we go! :D
16GB on 32Bit OS? :confused:confused:
A lot of volts for very little Mhz (unless of course this is very early revision stuff going on here and CPU-Z does not understand the sensors).
I see a good competitor here to 2600K
John
Cpu-z needs updates...And this cpu is eng sample, not to be even post any detailed infos.
For now,please follow amd site for more REAL infos. Zpu-z is always *** when it comes to details as fresh hardware
HWiNFO32 should report much more on Bulldozer, however it seems the branding is still not finalized.
Only 3 useable as far as I can see.Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnZS
I just find it odd they'd have win 7 32-bit. 2.99gb out of 16gb is correct. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by soya_crack
Mumak has right...btw, nice to see Bulldozer :)
Well it will be a good example of what we can expect for at least 5 years I think.Quote:
Originally Posted by richierich
I am not partial to Intel, if AMD comes out with a competitive product, I will probably buy it.
Guess what?
http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...lldozerlol.jpg
Bulldozer rocking out at a stock speed of 333x11.5? Or something completely different? :)
Vdd is constant. Idd is not, thus your formula does not work.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliverda
the eq would be P=aCV^2f, where a is the activity factor. add static power to that for total power which also increases with voltage.
with that said, i still agree that it is extremely difficult to compare processes.
think, this 1.56 will be same fake. From 1.4. was a few fakes on the web...