http://www.anandtech.com/show/4023/t...50-benchmarked
http://techreport.com/articles.x/19981
http://hothardware.com/Reviews/AMD-Z...mance-Preview/
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=1039
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1470/1/
Printable View
woop nice figs where are the dam laptops based on it?
Thanks for the links onethreehill....
Anyone that got the time to make a power measurement comparison?
Gotta get to class! :D
Really crushes the Atom, about damn time... would make a netbook / ultra-mobile much more attractive to me now, esp. if priced right
http://www.pcper.com/images/reviews/1039/power-idle.jpg
http://www.pcper.com/images/reviews/1039/power-cb11.jpg
http://www.pcper.com/images/reviews/1039/power-l4d2.jpg
Almost equal performance to a SU2300 + ION with much lower energy requirement nice...
about time :D
cant wait for a tablet with this chip
I hope Intel intros that single core + HT sandy bridge CULV that i had heard about some months ago. That would be a very good match up against the Bobcat. A single core + HT SNB would certainly be energy effective enough and the original plan that i heard was that the GPU would be the same as the other CPU's.
The new GPU and CPU with dynamic clock would totally work out. But i have not heard anything about it since then the last i heard was about dual core SB based CULV's with lower clocks, which is sad given the added silicon and lower clocks.
You are welcome :DQuote:
Originally Posted by ajaidev
Legitreviews
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1470/1/
Can someone explain what the Anandtech article is trying to do? He's saying that there is disappointment when compared to the dual core Pentium. Isn't that a completely different class of system as far as form factor and power consumption?
Maybe I'm ignorant of such things. :confused:
god dammit! why isnt there an option with fast cpu and slow/cut down gpu???
Seems like someone was wrong about power consumption. :D
So late in my country (2:57am). Worth my time.
Now who could that be? It's a bit of a shame to not be able to see what his respond would be.Quote:
Originally Posted by -Boris-
Looks to be a good platform, I'm actually really interested in buying one of those as my girlfriend isn't moving any time soon which means 6h of sitting idle on a train every two weeks.
Anandtech has a very strange review and conclusion, they mention that the system is much faster and healthier then any Atom yet the cpu benchmarks show a different idea because those are favorit HT benchmarks, I own a n455 with 2gb ram and ssd and it is ok for general usage, but its slow when loading things, even my ssd wasn't able to make it shine i.s.o the 7,2K sata2 hd. so it is clearly cpu limited. would like to see real world compare loading apps, and battery time. Atom has a very low TDP yet when you look at power consumption you see higher consumption then brazos.
In most of our benchmarks the performance advantage over Atom isn't huge, yet using Brazos is much better than using an Atom based machine. It all boils down to one thing: single threaded performance. Atom can make up for its deficiencies by executing a lot of threads in parallel, but when you're bound by the performance of a single thread the E-350 shines. The E-350 is 65% faster than the Atom D510 in the single threaded Cinebench R10 test. It's this performance advantage that makes the E-350 feel so much quicker than Atom.
AMD give us the 25W rated brazos in notebooks and netbooks.
yeah i stopped reading the anand review, it was bs. none of the cpus or tests made any sense. all the other reviews were great though! i thought the cpu would be a bit more powerful, but given its power draw...well you just cant beat it.
Anandtech tests the platform as a full desktop platform.
Without actual power consumption, the platform is of course not great in pure performance view against desktop systems.
Yep, and since its power consumption is lower than a lot of the Atom configs, it's quite impressiveQuote:
Originally Posted by qcmadness
Hmm... is it? ASUS Eee PC 1015N (N550+ION2) has very close performance to the highest boobcat and consumes 8.5-15W depends on the load. Btw, the notebook available on newegg just for $419 and has 9.5h of battery life. Also I really doubt we will see $500 netbooks with 128GB SSD soon.Quote:
Originally Posted by zerazax
Looks like the early BOINC scores weren't even close to being representative.
its look promising
According to which review?Quote:
Originally Posted by kl0012
I don't find the ASUS machine in any of the reviews. Well I do find a 1015PN in the review from Techreport, but it gets it's ass kicked.
the correct term is "ass handed to"Quote:
Originally Posted by -Boris-
http://www.netbooknews.com/6742/dual...n-benchmarked/Quote:
Originally Posted by -Boris-
In techreports review most of the scores between bobcat & N550 were pretty close. But keep in mind that bobcat was tested with SSD, so I would want to see how it performs with 5400 RPM HD and 1GB of memory (like in 1015PN)
Unfortunately, as much as people would like, you can't really compare scores across different sites (different methodologies for example) and assume that they'd get the same score for the same platformQuote:
Originally Posted by kl0012