Just got a pair of OCZ Vertex LE drives...Very nice drives so far..Here are some benches..:)
-M
http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q...xLe2xraid0.gif
Printable View
Just got a pair of OCZ Vertex LE drives...Very nice drives so far..Here are some benches..:)
-M
http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q...xLe2xraid0.gif
Sweet :)
I am kinda in a pickle as I dont know what drive to get/wait for. I can get the OCZ Vertex LE 100G right now or the Intel 160G G2 or wait for the Crucial C300. I dont have SATA 6 capable Mobo, but might in the future. If I wait too much longer the Vertex LE wont be available any more...
Damn!
impressive write speeds for just 2 drives. I get about 450xxx with my 3 vertex 30GB
Great AS SSD score! - this might be the highest I have seen from ich10!
I might not be able to match this score - even with 6xR0 acards!
ICH10R can do even more then this, this is my score with two tiny SLC from Intel in Raid0 (this run was to get the highest possible score):Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveRo
http://bildr.no/thumb/605042.jpeg
Anvil have done a couple over 1k as well, on ICH10 with 4xGen. 1 and 4xGen. 2... He also hve two OCZ Vetex LE's in raid0, and those are sweet drives, allthough they have some issues... :up:
^ nice! :cool:
Ourasi - 2xR0 intelx25-e's? Very nice score!
I'll need to try a max run with ich10/acards sometime soon.
I don't think I can match what you guys are showing here.
Yupp, 2x32GB X25-E in Raid0, good score considering my X58 have Option ROM v8.5, wich is a tad slower then v8.9.0/8.9.1... Anyone familiar with Award/Phoenix modding? Have modded half of norways O-ROM's, sux to be stuck with this old shait..
why are your write speeds so low? One vertex LE does 270writes.
2 x 270 = 540...looks right on the money to me ? (on ATTO that is)
I think it is right on target....avg 550 /2 = 275! :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Boogerlad
-M
i am a little leery of the vertex le series. they seem to be having a bug of some sort. for the limited amount of devices available there seems to be alot of support tickets for them over at ocz. there is no official word from ocz that i have seen as of yet, however.....
Crazy 4k results! Congrats on your purchase! :up:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olly_K
as in, if two vertex le are in raid 0, then it should be 270*2=540, unless I'm reading the post wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by managerman
This turned out better than I thought - for comparison, this is ich10r with 6x Acard9010 R0, cpu @ 4.5, pcie @115.Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveRo
I don't know what happened to iometer 4MB reads -
http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/9...e115cpu.th.png
Just going to give this a little bump as I have 2 of these drives on RAID 0 on ICH10R. My 4k is woeful.. Please give me info on how you have setup the RAID array and which intel RST drivers you are using - thanks
http://i43.tinypic.com/2ziycyb.jpg
http://i42.tinypic.com/243nguq.jpg
"He also hve two OCZ Vetex LE's in raid0, and those are sweet drives, allthough they have some issues"Quote:
Originally Posted by Ourasi
issues?????????care to go into detail on these issues.i have had the OCZ Vetex Le in my cart like 4 x this month,i bailed out(vertex 2 pro reviews sold me).but anyway whats wrong with it exactly,plz be honest.buying stuff from seeing good numbers is a great feeling.getting 1 home and having issues suks.then refunds even suk more.
very nice numbers guys - both seq and random
That is just the thing that has been bugging me all along.....Quote:
Originally Posted by managerman
The disrepancy between the ATTO sequential read / write results and the numbers Crystalmark and AS SSD put out....
ATTO is maxing out at 540 / 560 and AS SSD and Crystalmark are reporting over 100mb/s less reads and way more than 100 mb/s less writes..... they cannot both be right :confused:
So which is it?
Either Atto or Crystalmark / AS SSD is wrong or differences in the testing methodology used between them are producing different results.....
They ARE both right. What's not right is the way you think of the performance of the Vertex LE ;)
As you may know, sandforce SSDs use a compression algorithm on data that is compressable to increase read/write speeds, and at the same time get more spare area.
Crystal and AS SSD uses data patterns wich are virtually uncompressable (pseudo-random data seed).
ATTO, HDtune, IOmeter, and a bunch of other benchmark programs use simple patterns wich are highly compressable.
This results in Crystal and AS SSD showing you the RAW numbers (the physical speed of the device), while the others show you best case (real speed on compressable data).
Anvil did a couple of tests and found roughly the same numbers as Crystal and AS when copying JPG, ZIP, ISO, etc. The raw write-speed of Vertex LE is around 140MB/s.
Anvil found when copying VMs, wich are a more typical real world scenario of mixed compressable and uncompressable, a write speed around 175MB/s (ca 20% compression). Other things may get higher compression.