-
Tom2D Benchmark
I am interested in 2D performance. So I was happy to see the Tom's Hardware article addressing the subject. Look how my Windows 7 score is lower than my Vista on a duel boot system. I am using a HD 4850 with ATI Catalyst 10.2 .
Vista 64-Bit
http://chuckbam.com/Posts/2DBench.PNG
Windows 7 64-bit
http://chuckbam.com/Posts/2DBenchmarkWin7.PNG
Anyone interested in posting their results?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part 2: 2D, Acceleration, And Windows: Aren't All Graphics Cards Equal?
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...-gdi,2547.html
Download Tom2D Benchmark
http://www.tomshardware.com/de/downl...301-26150.html
-
-
2 Attachment(s)
Windows 7 x64 on 5870 with and without aero.
--Matt
-
1 Attachment(s)
Laptop:
Core 2 Duo P8600 (2.4GHz)
Radeon 4570 512MB
Catalyst 10.1
Windows 7 x64
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
fellix_bg
And now with the leaked Cat 10.3 beta (8.71) driver:
http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/6456/directu.png
-
Windows 7 x64
GeForce 8800GTX (Soft-modded to Quadro FX4600)
191.07
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2028/Xtreme%...Tom3D_1847.png
-
heres mine with i3-530 and ATI-3450
win 7 x64 catalyst 9.5
http://i50.tinypic.com/1445fk1.jpg
-
Hi everybody, my first post here.
*W7 X64
*HD5970
*Catalyst 10.3 preview driver
Interesting 10.3 results about 2X Catalyst 10.2 and results for Aero enabled and disabled are inverted with 10.3.
enabled
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1268879156
disabled
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1268879329
In PC Pitstop 2D results with 10.3 are about 3X Catalyst 10.2
I thought 2D problems with HD 5000 series were to be solved only with Catalyst 10.4.
-
1 Attachment(s)
Windows 7 x64
Intel T6400 @ 2.00 Ghz
Intel GMA 4500MHD (integrated graphics)
8.15.10.2086 driver
Seems like Intel IGPs do fairly well at least in 2D GDI/GDI+ operations.
-
WOW...this benchmark seem woefully inconsistent :shakes:
-
OS: W7 64bit
GPU: 8800 gtx
Driver: 196.34
CPU: i5 750 @ 3.6 ghz
http://bildr.no/thumb/611187.jpeg
