RIG 4890
-e2160 @ 3.85 GH
-4 GB
-ASUS P5Q
-tx 850w
RIG 5870
-e84 @ 4 GH
-4 GB
-ASUS P5Q
-tx 850w
4890 @ 1000/1150
http://i35.tinypic.com/13yknqo.jpg
5870 DEF
http://i34.tinypic.com/24watdh.jpg
5870 OC @ 900/1300
http://i36.tinypic.com/5b2nx3.jpg
WELL remember only personal versus/review
How are we supposed to compare those results??? The CPU needs to be the same on both rigs to give us a reasonable apple-to-apples comparison :shrug:
I'm a little confused about that too. Given that the rest of the two systems are the same, right down to PSU, I'm assuming that this is the same PC with different graphics cards used - in which case, why change the CPU and stuff up the results?
maybe the TS just want to share with us the perform 5870 with his RIG...
this thread should be called.
E2160 @ 3.8Ghz vs E8400 @ 4.00Ghz
The difference in speed and cache is going to make a difference in the results. Youd be surprised just how much too.
yup...once again share only...no-offenceQuote:
Originally Posted by YuDi IzzY
Yea, well if he want´s to show as the performance of a 5870 he must do it with the same CPU, Mobo, memory. Theres a big difference between a E2160 and E8400...Quote:
Originally Posted by YuDi IzzY
well, i have backup, same setting except CPU, Q66 @ 3.8 GH.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShArKo
anyway still BIG difference between e84 @ 4GH and Q66 @ 3.8 GH ?
Q66@3.8 GH + 4890 @ 950/1150
http://i33.tinypic.com/eirrxf.jpg
Well Gaul I think if you want to show as the performance of the 5870 you gotta use the same hardware (mobo, mem, cpu). The performance of the Q6600 and E8400 are very similar, but some people can say that is not a just comparison....
OK, no big deal, it's personal comparision....:p:Quote:
Originally Posted by ShArKo
well, we must start learn this articel.......Quote:
Originally Posted by ShArKo
http://www.guru3d.com/article/cpu-sc...e-processors/9
according that ones :
http://i35.tinypic.com/2mwfi50.jpg
and with Q6600 you used 1400 resolution. ofcourse you get higher result with Q6600 try it with 1900 resolution enthusiast again
Looks to me like even with if it did have the same hardware the 5870 is not that great for a double spec improvment in Shaders over the 4890.
cpu must be equal too
E21XX isnt equal to E8XX
I think this has been said enough times./\:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by westsider
Thx for the comparison Gual. Something is better than nothing:up:
thanx...soon i'll post q9550 @ 4.25 GH :) + 5870.Quote:
Originally Posted by \/icious
It amases me each time again that this is still being called a comparison... data is soooooo off... and then it's being called a personal review which makes it more valid ? C'mon...
MORE.........COMPAREQuote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
http://i49.tinypic.com/209rtkj.jpg
Ontopic:OMFG the results are close,I will test with my 4890 @ 1050-1200 tommorow,congrats anyway.
For the E2140 @ 3.8 is not E8400 @ 4.0 crowd other than getting the award for Captain Obvious! (well deserved you all earned it) you should look at CPU scaling for this game,since the differences are very small 2 FPS max between the 2 CPU's which makes it weird seeing that a card with double the hardware specs is only 6FPS or 4-5 (CPU bound) faster than 4890....
Crapsis is such a bad benchmark tool anyway.
thanx......yup, today i'll test with q9550 @ 3.4 GH :)Quote:
Originally Posted by XS2K
So In That The 4890 Aint That Far Behind The 5870 I Knew That Card Was Over Hyped! Come On...
yes.....but 4890 OC @ 1000/1150 ...:DQuote:
Originally Posted by dan7777
just make a chart comparing CPU / GPU / Resolution scaling instead of all these screenshots... there's no overview here... also use data of at least 3-5 runs and take the average...
E 5200 @ 3.75Ghz and 4890 @ 1010-1150 28.31,will try some more OC later.
Can someone with a 5870 try this test and tell us their results it just seems extremely weird that the gap is soo small between 4890 OC and 5870...
Damned 200kb limit...:shakes:
http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/5816/warhead.th.jpg