Check this out :)
http://www.abload.de/img/img_2250s9sp.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/img_2249ixgm.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/img_2257w93t.jpg
:shocked:
Printable View
lul wut
Would that even scale?
Heatdump FTW!
By the looks of it it would be like adding another 4 90's to your loop. Pass...
Lol . . .
Looking forward for some reviews =)
Wow, there is extreme, then there is just why.
It would be interesting to see if it does scale though.
I'll pass, saving my money for the quad ddc.. :cool:
yeaaaahhhh 54w of heatdump in my loop rofl :D
120.1 rad just for pumps. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Garrett
Isn't this going just a tiny bit far? lol...
But then again, I'm glad things that push the envelope like this are available. Rather have the option to be xtreme and choose not to then to never have had the option at all :P.
Does seem a bit excessive. The design looks inefficient, but I remember Skinnee testing the dual version which used the same design and scaled very well. Maybe running 3 undervolted MCP350's would be nice and quiet while still giving good head.
bundymania your photoshopping skills are outstanding
just joking :p:
Dayam...
And i thought it would be a cold day in hell the day an RD-30 looked small.
I know Vapor is drolling somewhere going i must have....
He's the only one i can think of that uses more then 2 DDC's in a series.
Why is it that the outlet sections of each pump in this setup have to go through two 90 degree turns? Couldn't they just shoot straight from the outlet area from one pump to the inlet of the next pump?
This picture should dictate what I'm talkin about...
http://home.comcast.net/~jefftrexler/newflow.jpg
Its a good question, I'm willing to guess it is the design of the impeller. The 90s didn't hurt the dual version that Skinnee tested though. :shrug:
I'm sorry, but that is so bad as$ :D
It would be hard to manufacture like that, as well, XSPC have done tests and it performers great how it is. Bundy will have data soon, and i'm sure Skinnee will do some at a later date.
does this even have any benefit over, say, the twin top?
to be honest i cant think of many people who would use it.
70 each ddc x 3 = 210 dollars on the pumps alone.
Then the top is probably gonna cost somewhere near 60 dollars for that much acrylic + cutting.. so your looking at almost a 300 dollar package.
Theres only a hand few of people i can think of that even have more then 3 ddc's in there current systems.
Meh... time to go bug john and have him rsvp me this top, so i can go bug eric about it later on. :)
:wasntme:
wait..Quote:
Originally Posted by skinnee
do you even have 3 unused DDC's? :rofl:
I thought u only had 2, and my cache of D5's :P
^^^Quote:
Originally Posted by skinnee
Can i seriously kill you one day?Quote:
Originally Posted by skinnee
If i say Please will it increase my chances? :rofl:
This is some serious pump power...
Cute, but once you've got 2 DDC 3.2's in series, the third one really doesn't do much for your performance. My own testing saw a degree improvement... maybe. And this one doesn't conveniently fit into a 5 1/4" bay like the dual-version does. If you were hard-core about silence, perhaps using 3.1's might be useful? In a very limited, expensive sort of way?
Jesus, I don't think I'd ever need that kind of GPM... it's neat, though, if you want to be the cool guy with 3 pumps. :)