HD 5700s pictures & benchmarks

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-01-2009, 08:25 PM
onethreehill

HD 5700s pictures & benchmarks

http://translate.google.nl/translate...istory_state0=
10-01-2009, 08:30 PM
Smartidiot89

I love you onetreehill!:hump:

1120 shaders and 56 ROPs so it's true... damn that card is insane... Now I want someone to confirm prices
10-01-2009, 08:33 PM
zerazax

Wow 1120 SP's and 56 ROPs? That's going to be an awesome price/perf card
10-01-2009, 08:43 PM
Bail_w

Dam, look at what that tiny thing can do. impressive...
10-01-2009, 08:43 PM
[XC] gomeler

Look at the size of that core! Harvested RV870 cores I take it? Should be a nice powerful midrange card and give AMD a nice $300-150 product portfolio.
10-01-2009, 08:45 PM
froste

Nice, I wanna see how well the 5770 overclocks :), might be my next card.
10-01-2009, 08:46 PM
Smartidiot89

Quote:

Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler

Look at the size of that core! Harvested RV870 cores I take it? Should be a nice powerful midrange card and give AMD a nice $300-150 product portfolio.

As far as I know "RV870" cores are close to a perfect square... So I don't think it's harvested this is more vertical. But wasn't this card "Juniper" rumored to be 180mm2? Comparing the core to memory chips it does look 180mm2-ish unless my eyes are playing a trick on me? :D

Looking forward to this card, now AMD price this thing "right". HD5850 already has a low price point, hoping $149 for HD5750!
10-01-2009, 08:54 PM
IvanAndreevich

Performance doesn't look that impressive compared to the 4770.
10-01-2009, 09:15 PM
froste

Quote:

Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich

Performance doesn't look that impressive compared to the 4770.

I belive that was the 5750 in the benchmark, hopefully the 5770 has a pretty decent jump in performance. *crossing fingers*
10-01-2009, 09:17 PM
IvanAndreevich

Quote:

Originally Posted by froste

I belive that was the 5750 in the benchmark, hopefully the 5770 has a pretty decent jump in performance. *crossing fingers*

Yeah, but for $150 it has to be beating GTX 260 Core 216 and HD4870. Good price for this would be $100-125.
10-01-2009, 09:19 PM
froste

Very true, $100 and $150 would a smoking deal... I guess they're trying to sell the DX11 and other new features, not just the performance
10-01-2009, 09:22 PM
IDANPE

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smartidiot89

I love you onetreehill!:hump:

1120 shaders and 56 ROPs so it's true... damn that card is insane... Now I want someone to confirm prices

tmu man, 56 tmu..
10-01-2009, 10:03 PM
LordEC911

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calmatory

*Snip*

Did you look at the link?
$199 and $149 in less than two weeks...

And yes it is Juniper- ~181mm2, someone estimated ~183mm2 w/ IHS.

Edit- Good sign for a 5890, there could be more in Cypress than what we have seen.
10-01-2009, 10:06 PM
zanzabar

how reliable is this place (or this guy) they dont know how to bench vantage

i really dont like this 2 dvi, DP and hdmi.
10-01-2009, 10:09 PM
Calmatory

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordEC911

Did you look at the link?
$199 and $149 in less than two weeks...

And yes it is Juniper- ~181mm2, somewhere estimated ~183mm2 w/ IHS.

I did not look at the link. I deleted my post as useless after I checked the link. :yepp:
10-01-2009, 10:16 PM
RPGWiZaRD

What I like most about this is cheap DX11 cards for teh people! Also nvidia seems like it's gonna offer a bit lower-end (read midrange cuz of cost issues) solutions for GT300 arch. So I think DX11 support/transition will be a lot more smooth than DX10. Couple that with a successful Windows 7 launch and I think we will start seeing DX11 supported games in quite large quantities rather quickly.
10-02-2009, 12:46 AM
saaya

Quote:

Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler

Look at the size of that core! Harvested RV870 cores I take it? Should be a nice powerful midrange card and give AMD a nice $300-150 product portfolio.

its juniper, not cypress...

Quote:

Originally Posted by froste

Very true, $100 and $150 would a smoking deal... I guess they're trying to sell the DX11 and other new features, not just the performance

yeah... makes some sense, but i agree, 150$ is too high considering this is the 5750 and not even 5770...

first impression:
EEEEWWWwwwWwwWWWWWwww!!!! god that heatsink sucks!

second impression:
nice little card... but half a slot exhaust, meh... and dualslot... why?

third impression:
synthetic performance is nice, a 4850 with dx11 basically... wonder how well retail cards will clock and how actual game performance will be...
125$ would be a killer price, but 150$ is... acceptable...
10-02-2009, 12:56 AM
LordEC911

Quote:

Originally Posted by saaya

its juniper, not cypress...

yeah... makes some sense, but i agree, 150$ is too high considering this is the 5750 and not even 5770...

first impression:
EEEEWWWwwwWwwWWWWWwww!!!! god that heatsink sucks!

second impression:
nice little card... but half a slot exhaust, meh... and dualslot... why?

third impression:
synthetic performance is nice, a 4850 with dx11 basically... wonder how well retail cards will clock and how actual game performance will be...
125$ would be a killer price, but 150$ is... acceptable...

Not 4850... more like 4870.
10-02-2009, 12:59 AM
netkas

lol. they erased device-id field in gpuz, but same device-id was printed in GPU field.
10-02-2009, 01:41 AM
Smartidiot89

Quote:

Originally Posted by IDANPE

tmu man, 56 tmu..

Ok, ok I stand corrected:D

Quote:

Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich

Performance doesn't look that impressive compared to the 4770.

I have to agree on this...

HD4770: 640 Shaders, 32 tmus, 750mhz GPU, 800mhz GDDR5 @ 128-bit
HD5750: 1120 shaders, 56 tmus, 700mhz GPU, 1150mhz GDDR5 @ 128-bit

Anyone else think that this has to be early driver issues? There is no way I can believe these synthetics are anywhere close to it's true performance, also the CPU used was a Dual-Core downclocked to 2GHz? I meen it's also competing against GTX260 and GTX275.

HD5000 isn't scaling as it should... coult it be driver issues or something going on with the architecture reaching it's limit?
10-02-2009, 02:07 AM
eric66

sucky performance hope they improve it and 128 bit bus is ghey u put so much things into this card and then limit it to 128 bit lol way to go ati....
10-02-2009, 02:12 AM
Anemic

Im guessing there is a 5750x2 on the way too, right?
10-02-2009, 02:18 AM
Smartidiot89

Quote:

Originally Posted by eric66

sucky performance hope they improve it and 128 bit bus is ghey u put so much things into this card and then limit it to 128 bit lol way to go ati....

GDDR5
10-02-2009, 02:42 AM
Minstadave

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smartidiot89

GDDR5

Indeed, still has a decent chunk of banwidth.
10-02-2009, 02:50 AM
Jamesrt2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD

What I like most about this is cheap DX11 cards for teh people! Also nvidia seems like it's gonna offer a bit lower-end (read midrange cuz of cost issues) solutions for GT300 arch. So I think DX11 support/transition will be a lot more smooth than DX10. Couple that with a successful Windows 7 launch and I think we will start seeing DX11 supported games in quite large quantities rather quickly.

noo nvidia said that ati's new mid/low range will be unchallenged for months!!maybe not till tne end of H1 :(

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page