Printable View
http://img.inpai.com.cn/article/2009...c34858643f.jpg
http://img.inpai.com.cn/article/2009...95f7d0fc5f.png
http://en.inpai.com.cn/doc/enclass.asp?classid=1Quote:
Q7600 still adopts 45nm process clocked at 2.7GHz.It has a 800MHz of FSB,13.5X of multiplier.L2 cache capacity has be scaled down to 2MB,the same as current Pentium dual-core series.
:p: Intel is now flooding the market with quads the say way AMD has.
I don't know what to think of this though, at least until we can compare it to Q9550.
Perkam
that 13.5x multi should b fun:D
I bet that's just 2 E7200 cores glued together :p:
If prize is low that is going to sell well :)
Haha, looks fun CPU :)
If price is same level that E8400 is now it will sell a lot.
"And I were thinking that Intel is slowly killing LGA775 off"
Finally, Propus' competitor has arrived. :D
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/k..._athlon_x4.png
Quad-core, 2.7GHz, 2MB L2 Cache, 45nm... :p:
Nah, it's more like two Celeron E3500s in one bed. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by s0lid
http://www.xbitlabs.com/images/cpu/c...0/cpu-2508.png
Core2 arc needs its L2 cache, just like amd and L3. It may perform more like a E3300 "as the post above said" than a E6300/E7200....
A E6300 would be a better investment IMO !!
Wow and I thought 4mb of cache was bad.
exactly! cheap overclocking silliness!!! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by EliTE22
Give these chips cache and those multipliers and watch them fly! If 775 is dying off, Intel "dont need" the money they've recovered the development investment.
Give us the 2009 equivalent of the Opteron 144!
if these sell for close to $100 they will sell like crazy and be pretty fast overall. they would make fantastic budget cruncher machines why oced up to around the 4ghz mark considering something like WCG does not really benefit from a faster FSB, the cache will slow it down a little but not by a whole lot.
Intel FSB-800 == AMD Black Edition. Practically these should OC to 4GHz, if not more, on a cheap mainboard using a cheap DDR2/DDR3 RAM.
If we consider overclocking these cacheless C2Q's should give a hard time to Phenom II BE .
it will be interesting to see this against the athlon II x4...
Corrected :)Quote:
Originally Posted by gOJDO
SURE!!! Two Celeron 3000 Series fused together hahaha
all cpu's need cache. this is more of a push for mainstream quad and to get programmers to multithread than it is for performance.Quote:
Originally Posted by ajaidev
Finally a cheap quadcore and heres hoping it'll sell for cheap :up:
So how bad would this stomp on a Q6600?
Q6600 would stomp this... :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Talonman
:shocked:
Thanks...
intel getting rid of all th 7 series dual cores they didnt sell
Here you go:Quote:
Originally Posted by Talonman
http://www.intel.com/products/proces...ifications.htm
Q6600 was overshining most of the CPUs in the 45nm line-up to begin with so it's still a solid CPU unless you for some reason feel like buying a Nehalem en having 8 threads for... something :p:
Thanks again... :cool:
If this can match E8400 in overall powerconsumption (or sightly above), then it would make sense to pair it up with an ITX machine!
LOL +1:up: I mean 512k l2 per core... vs 2mb per core.. on CORE 2 arch... lol no comparison. most q6600 still hitting 3.6 on air, so even if this hits 4ghz I still agree on a q6600 win, aside the most menial apps.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartidiot89