:D
http://i413.photobucket.com/albums/p...cmark0528k.png
http://i413.photobucket.com/albums/p...528kyeye-2.png
Printable View
More info is welcome ?
lol tone down the XP Startup, believe the limit is 220mb/s :D Nice HDD scores otherwise, setup?
Is this the fastest default run?
That score is not valid. XP Startup should be limited down to 220MB/s ;) :up:
Just tried running the free( unregistered version) of this and got nothing showing on the scoring.
XP Pro64.. Am I missing something?:confused:
You're either missing requirements (if I had to guess it'd be windows media encoder) or the system is mildly unstable and didn't complete some of the tests.
Nizzen, you have a ways to go. Also, most people in the community refer to hwbot, where HDD startup scores higher than 220 MB/sec aren't allowed to prevent the usage of MFT.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=1984841
yup, looked quick and saw Windows media "player" 9 or better..Grabbing it now..:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
Anyone got any ideas what i'm doing wrong here?
Media encoder9 installed and still nothing..:shakes:
IIRC it must be a 32-bit version of Media Encoder, even on x64 OS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
damn, I installed the 64 bit version..Quote:
Originally Posted by JMKS
Ok, thanks for the info and we'll try again..:up:
MM, might be wrong, but you need "Adjust for best appearance" selected, Right click My Comp, click Properties, then Advanced and then System something (can't remember).
If you click the "Details" button on the result, you should be able to expand each section to see which test you didn't get a score for. :)
Yup, did that part, downloading the 32 bit media player now.. Wish me luck..Quote:
Originally Posted by r1ch
This machine just might beat the OP's score.. :wasntme:
Hey, someone want to delete my last post?:rofl:
Boy did I get my ass handed to me big time!:shakes:
Would have thought this system had more stones than that or is PCMark limited on cores it uses?
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/3604/pcmark051.jpg
You are clockspeed limited with PCM05. It scales to 4 cores max I believe and most of the tests are single or dual threaded. I believe PCM Vantage might be a better test for a dual-socket board but I think you'll still get stomped by a ~4GHz to 4.5GHz chip simply due to not all tests scaling to 16 threads.
I have a Vantage disk here that came with a card I bought but to run vantage means I'd have to run Vista and Vista isn't allowed in my house!:DQuote:
Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler
Vista is the only way to compete with PCM05 :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Then I won't as Vista is not coming into my house.Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler
garbage is garbage no matter what it's named..:p:
Dave you need about 4 or more SSDs in raid also. :up: I got 18,000 with 2 of the and only 13,000 with 2 raptors in raid.
I have 4-73 gig Seagate 15.4K SAS drives on that machine with a 350MB read and 250MB write.Quote:
Originally Posted by road-runner
Not the fastest that exists but not bad either..
I am not using MFT on my setup BTW :)
Large hdd/ssd array then? What type of storage? Fusion I/O lol?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nizzen
That would be my guess also.
Or win 7 like me :pQuote:
Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler
Ahh is it really win7 giving you that huge boost? What type of storage are you using ? SSD?