I can't make my mind up, got £200-£250 (or a little over) to spend on an SSD...
Intel
Vertex
SuperTalent ME
Are there any other contenders?
It's for OS, I got 2 750GB F1's for storage
Printable View
I can't make my mind up, got £200-£250 (or a little over) to spend on an SSD...
Intel
Vertex
SuperTalent ME
Are there any other contenders?
It's for OS, I got 2 750GB F1's for storage
well , intel ssd is better than the vertex and super talent , but you not notice the different
and super talent ME and vertex are equals in performance
and super talent ME in cheaper than vertex
So. super talent ME is the better choice
I just this afternoon setup and tested my new Intel X25-M. My prior OS drive was a 2X128 G.Skill Titan Raid0 array. The Intel absolutely kills the old raid array which was pretty fast in its own right. For instance with the Titan array Windows 7 loaded in about 18 secs from the "starting windows" splash. The Intel loads Win 7 in less than 10 sec. With the Titan Photoshop cs4 loaded in about 4 sec. The intel loads in 3 sec.
Intel is quite simply the best that is presently available.
Thanks guys...
The Intels are tempting but I just found a review pitting a G Skill Falcon 128gb against an X25-m and I have to say it was almost neck and neck!
I've found a place selling the 128gb Falcon for £247, think I might go for that...
Are there any others with the indilinx controller worth considering?
I went with an OCZ Vertex 60GB over the G.Skill Falcon 64GB, as I love the support OCZ offers, and they're on the front line of any releases Indilinx makes (they've already released a TRIM tool).
I don't think it really matters too much, but I prefer to have the great customer support from OCZ (I've heard SuperTalent and G.Skill are pretty much non-existent in that department).
Really though, it's up to you.
I didn't want to wait before getting my first SSD.
I have all my other parts now and am ready to start assembling.
I agree about OCZ support, they are the best in my experience, RMA turnaround in under 7 days! Wow
Asus on the otherhand:down:
When I decided to go i7, I RMA'd my maximus formula SE because the LCD poster stopped working. I want to sell it on, fully working.
That was 4 weeks ago...:shocked:
BTW, despite my love for OCZ support, I couldn't resist the price of the 128gb Falcon(£250 delivered), should be here by Wednesday:D
I've since been trawling the reviews and the Falcon comes out above the Vertex in tests.
Although in the real world I know I would never be able to tell any diff. It was the price really that won me over.
I wonder what GSkill support is like?:confused:
If I ever need it, good I hope!
Hope you don't need support - G.Skill has got to be about the worst though their products are good.
i would get the corsair, the samsung controller works better with small reads and writes than the indilinx. and its cheaper
edit wanted indilinx not invotec
This a great review of the Falcon...
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...sd-review.html
I think from a reliable source! lol
Corsair offering seem pretty good.
JMicron? :shocked:
I think you've mis-interpreted it.
X25-m is faster than Jmicron in real world test.
Lower is better
http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/im..._copy_self.jpg
The Apex, Titan etc are not just ordinary J-microns as they have two controllers and are internally set in raid 0. J-microns week point was only lack of cache and VERY slow 4k writes that caused perceptible slowdowns mainly when multitasking, I think because of this people now place a little too much importance with 4k writes on newer drives.
When the drive is not doing lots of small writes, then I would have thought it would perform very well indeed, just would never have thought it would out-perform the x25-m, particularly if the M was in a fresh state.
Even though I find it hard to believe, I also find it hard to believe a reviewer could make such a mistake more than once especially after checking the results more than once!
Perhaps it's actually true?
yah sorry, invotec is not what i meant, meant indilinx
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/sto...b-ssd-review/9
http://techreport.com/articles.x/16848/10
The tech report times are mainly sequential, but I have found from previous experience that are often FOS or are just crappy with a stop watch.
And so it seems is bit-tech!
I looked at a review yesterday J-microns are the fasted of them all! Some of these reviewers are not worth their salt it seems at times.
These IOmeter benchmarks tell a different story with regards to small files.
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/sto...b-ssd-review/8
And so does this review.
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.ph...=18468&page=12
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...&limitstart=12
yah i know that i picked some, but i like the corsair