Laing DDC3.25 // Koolance PMP400

short take

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c5...5/P1020388.jpg

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c5...5/P1020389.jpg

guess which is a 3.2 and a 3.25 :D
:banana::banana::banana::banana: its angled...oh well
:D

no difference...i guess

just the impeller?

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c5...5/P1020394.jpg



now on to the restrictive part

Master of Strangulation
http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c5...5/P1020400.jpg

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c5...5/P1020401.jpg

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c5...5/P1020398.jpg


new pump is better...b(u)y a notch

Stock v. Stock? Top v. Top? (stock v. top? :wth: )

Did you look to see if the orange+blue impeller is in your 3.25?

EDIT: also loop conditions? The data, while telling because it's basically identical, is also pretty spartan ;)

im not seeing any difference... :rofl:

can u tell us?

1more pic added

I don't see any difference except impeller is orange inside and blue outside :shrug:

Flow rate is the same. What about max PSI though, it might have more head pressure?

i don't have a manometer...

and oh yeah i used ek xtop v2 on both...i don't like stock :)


head pressure? i put them on the same restriction..thanks to vl3's

What about a more significant amount of restriction?

Their PQ curves don't separate until lower flowrates :)

http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/2625/ddc325.jpg

good idea i have more vl3's :rofl:

Stick a supreme on there .... or two :D

Fuzion V2 with the smallest nozzle is my poison of choice....:p:

(should be more restrictive than 2x EK Supremes too ;))

i like the ideas but this is the Master of Strangulation

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c5...5/P1020400.jpg

done...

and.... your such a tease :p:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mcoffey

And that's one pump only with the high restriction test?

Nice setup, and thanks for the hard work,

andyc

---

yep..its soooo better ................not

but idoes perform better...now to get me some more microreservoirs:D

Very interesting and exactly what I was curious about, thanks! :toast:

eh, it certainly isn't worth spending nearly $170 to replace the ddc-2s everyone already has....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mcoffey

I'm been had, I been bambozeled, I been hoodwinked:shakes: :with: :owned: :hitself:

Not really, like I said, needed 2 more pumps anyway, but just have to laugh at myself sometimes.

andyc

---

In your case its worth it ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mcoffey

I'm been had, I been bambozeled, I been hoodwinked:shakes: :with: :owned: :hitself:

Not really, like I said, needed 2 more pumps anyway, but just have to laugh at myself sometimes.

andyc

---

separate the loops :D i got a new radiator coming so..the two will be in series :) for my videocard :yepp:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mcoffey

I been bambozeled

andyc

---

can i sig that :rofl:

i still might pic one up for my Apogee drive, its got no pump (took it off and used it because i had no tabs :rolleyes:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vapor

What about a more significant amount of restriction?

Their PQ curves don't separate until lower flowrates :)

http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/2625/ddc325.jpg

---

Interesting... based on those curves, there isn't really a meaningful difference within the range that our systems operate (aside from increased power consumption). I'd have to do up some curves with tops to compare the two...

I wonder if anyone will get their hands on one of these and throw a top on it...

Thanks for testing.

But darn, I was really hoping putting a top on there would have separated the two pumps more than what the stock curve is like. I'd still like to see a full pump curve at some point with a good top and both pump motors just out of curiosity...but this explains the real world results well enough, not a huge gain..