SuperPi1M SUB7 by Z.O.T.

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

02-02-2009, 01:26 PM
GraduS

SuperPi1M SUB7 by Z.O.T.

E8600 Q822A435 -120C
Vcore 1.82V :rolleyes:
DFI LP DK P45-T2RS PLUS @ 662FSB
DDR2 @ 662 5-5-4-10 2.4V

SuperPi1M best run at 6626Mhz(not cpu limited):
6.906s
http://img55.imageshack.us/img55/870...8496sb8.th.jpg

Max valid 6634.27MHz (663.43 * 10)
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=498007

Update:
GraduS & Crowz bench 14.02.09

E8600@6650mhz@1.88v@LN2@-130
DFI@1.5v@ln2@-50
ballistix@2.6v

thx PSP-Devices for golden Q822A435, thx Cerber for DDR2. :clap:

SuperPi1M: 6.797s :cool:
http://s40.radikal.ru/i089/0902/12/d7a04ad373e8t.jpg
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=821979

Pifast: 14.61s :down:
http://s57.radikal.ru/i156/0902/d5/d6d17bed6325t.jpg
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=821987
02-02-2009, 01:30 PM
Oliver

good job , congrats on the archivement
02-02-2009, 01:31 PM
ceemic

Whoa :eek:
Nice CPU on that low Vcore :up:

What BIOS on DFI? Perf can be improved a little bit.
02-02-2009, 01:34 PM
GraduS

Oliver, ceemic
thx

Quote:

Originally Posted by ceemic

What BIOS on DFI? Perf can be improved a little bit.

BIOS 812. flex mem mode is disabled :(
02-02-2009, 01:45 PM
ceemic

Use 725 BIOS ;)
With better perf, You can do WR on that CPU speed.

Good luck!
02-02-2009, 01:46 PM
hey

very nice , it seems you can improve results with cas4 ?
02-02-2009, 01:53 PM
Viss

Crazy mhz with them volts and temp. Sure this is coldest it wil run? Q822 strikes again :up: Give 725 bios a shot, 6626mhz max for now here as wel and not cpu max either. Lets race :toast:
02-02-2009, 02:02 PM
Hyperhorn

No doubt, that's an amazing chip! :eek:
02-02-2009, 03:34 PM
Bullet92

huh... there's a lot of space to improve that result.

1. Use 725 BIOS
2. Use well-tweaked-lited windows 2k3 /xp sp3.
3. Set you memorys to symmetric mod
Give us information of memset (sub-latencies) to figure out what you can do with it.

With these 3 steps you can easily smash the WR.

However, awesome result :up:
02-02-2009, 03:57 PM
GraduS

Quote:

Originally Posted by hey

very nice , it seems you can improve results with cas4 ?

my ram cant go up to 660+ with 4-4-4((

Quote:

Originally Posted by loc.o

Sure this is coldest it wil run?

Coldbug@-135, but more than -120 we have "not convergent in SQR" error.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bullet92

huh... there's a lot of space to improve that result.

1. Use 725 BIOS
2. Use well-tweaked-lited windows 2k3 /xp sp3.
3. Set you memorys to symmetric mod
Give us information of memset (sub-latencies) to figure out what you can do with it.

1 why 725? on 812 i have 11.219s at 4Ghz with flex mode mem(i cant bench with it on 660+, only 645fsb). i try 725 of course.
2 my windows xp sp2 good :)
3 how can i do this?

I make tomorrow screen with sub-latencies.

Thx all)
02-02-2009, 04:05 PM
Bullet92

Quote:

Originally Posted by GraduS

1 why 725? on 812 i have 11.219s at 4Ghz with flex mode mem(i cant bench with it on 660+, only 645fsb). i try 725 of course.
2 my windows xp sp2 good :)
3 how can i do this?

1. Because it is proven the best - Why didn't you rebench with 725 than? :)
2. Maybe but I see that it can be much better ;)
3. Try to set the memory modules in other channels
02-03-2009, 01:29 AM
Spacemaster

This is the sub 7 result so "Great Work mate" and congrats on the achievement! :)
02-03-2009, 01:47 AM
Ultimation

Congratiolations! Push it for new WR?
02-03-2009, 04:41 AM
1200W

Good job , congrats.
02-03-2009, 08:06 AM
TheKarmakazi

Very nice results, such low voltage for those speeds!!! :up:
02-03-2009, 10:16 AM
GraduS

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bullet92

1. Because it is proven the best - Why didn't you rebench with 725 than?
3. Try to set the memory modules in other channels

1. Flashed 725, no difference with 812.
2. I try today, no results. But i find how Set mem to symmetric mod:
FLEX MODE!
FLEX MODE ENABLED = symmetric = good perf = 630-640fsb
FLEX MODE DISABLED = asymmetric = bad perf = 655+fsb
:shrug: :mad:
I dont know why i cant bench with symmetric & 655+fsb...any ideas?!?

Spacemaster, Ultimation, 1200W, TheKarmakazi Thx! :)
02-03-2009, 10:41 AM
hiwa

congrats ;) and really nice chip 1.82 66XX benchable ;);)
02-03-2009, 11:13 AM
KanGaXx

your cpu doesn't want more voltage ? mine is similar , max 1,87v, with 1,9v is unstable.. your is the same ?

vtt & gtl used ?
02-03-2009, 11:22 AM
GraduS

hiwa thx.

Quote:

Originally Posted by aerie

your cpu doesn't want more voltage ? mine is similar , max 1,87v, with 1,9v is unstable.. your is the same ?

no, my system mem/mobo limited.

Quote:

Originally Posted by aerie

vtt & gtl used ?

1.35v
63/63/61
02-03-2009, 11:42 AM
SeLecT

Nice chip!

Push it! :up:
02-03-2009, 02:07 PM
DeDaL

Congrats with your damn good result and CPU my friend :up:

I want your cpu :D
02-03-2009, 02:33 PM
KanGaXx

wow nice, with more than 1,9v your cpu is ok benching ?
02-04-2009, 12:54 AM
Kean

Sorry Mate, but for me it looks like fake.
Misstakes in SPI window, and poor info about CPU in CPU-z
02-04-2009, 02:45 AM
GraduS

SeLecT thx
DeDaL not damn good result)))
aerie i dont try 1.9v+. i try it next bench with SS on mobo.
Kean United Team of Poland?!?! :welcome: :D
Where misstakes & poor info about CPU?
02-04-2009, 03:37 AM
MARCO74

Congrats you have one crazy chip 1.82v= 6634 benchable is fantastic

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page