thermolab BARAM vs ULTRA-120 eXtreme [LGA1366 Test]

It is cooler developing in Korean enterprise.(http://thermolab.co.kr/)

Performance is very good and price is inexpensive.:)

Korea Retail price $44.58 (USD)


http://pds10.egloos.com/pds/200901/2...88d45014fa.jpg

http://pds10.egloos.com/pds/200901/2...88d5212636.jpg

http://pds13.egloos.com/pds/200901/2...88d5fb7f43.jpg

http://pds11.egloos.com/pds/200901/2...88d7b6225d.jpg

http://pds11.egloos.com/pds/200901/2...88d8c18b68.jpg

http://pds13.egloos.com/pds/200901/2...88d9902efd.jpg

http://pds13.egloos.com/pds/200901/2...88da5ce308.jpg

http://pds14.egloos.com/pds/200901/2...88dae64c52.jpg


Measurement point
http://pds10.egloos.com/pds/200901/2...8909c449bb.jpg





I did ULTRA-120 eXtreme course comparison test.

Test rig..
Mainboard : Asus Rampage II Extreme
CPU : I7 920
Memory : Gskill 12800 HK 2G Triple CH
Power : Enermax Revolution85+ ERV1250EGT
FAN : Bio Sonic 35T 120mm
Cooler : Thermolab BARAM & ULTRA-120 eXtreme


Test condition
[CPU : 4G Vcore : 1.35V]
Room TEMP : 17.8℃
FAN : Bio Sonic 35T 120mm (3000rpm)
CPU Full Load Utill : EVEREST FPU Stress Test




Video test.. :D

ULTRA-120 eXtreme
http://v.egloos.com/v.sk/egloos/a010...00000845701701


thermolab BARAM
http://v.egloos.com/v.sk/egloos/a010...00000846021701





Result...
ULTRA-120 eXtreme → 30℃
BARAM → 31℃

ULTRA-120 eXtreme is superior 1℃. But, I am thought that BARAN that price is more inexpensive is very superior. :up:


BARAM → Korea Retail price 44.58 (USD)
ULTRA-120 eXtreme → Korea Retail price 71.90 (USD)

1C difference is in the margin of error. Was the TRUE Lapped?

holy crap i can even see your nail hasn't been cut in a long time.... that really clear for a base.

Wow I thought the camera was sitting on the base :rofl:

If the Baram is like xigmateks coolers we may have a new price/performance leader.

Maybe its a camera with a cooler

I've been saying it for a while, heatsink manufacturers need to spread the heatpipes out within the fins instead of leaving them grouped together. BARAM did it with this and it performs wonderfully.

Awesome, especially the base, like a goddamn mirror.
Is it only me but it looks like mutated ultra? ;e

Is that a machine finish or they lap those things

Any testing with 2 fans? Last test I saw shown significant improvements much like a TRUE when you put 2 fans on it.

WOW this looks so good! I really believe that Thor cooler from xigmatek has some real chance of beating true now...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OC_Windforce

Result...
ULTRA-120 eXtreme → 30℃
BARAM → 31℃

---

Is it load temps? Why so low?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Polizei

I've been saying it for a while, heatsink manufacturers need to spread the heatpipes out within the fins instead of leaving them grouped together. BARAM did it with this and it performs wonderfully.

---

well said:up:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by L'enFer

Is it load temps? Why so low?

---

Thermal probe put near to the IHS....not die temps. :-/

"Near"? How near should the temp sensor be placed to show that temperatures? It is only 14 degree higher than room temp.

Mill out the IHS and place it in the IHS :)

That's what Intel does at least :p:

X-Bit labs has a review on Baram....http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/coo...lab-baram.html

I still prefer the TuniQ Tower 120 design to all others similar.

What is xbit labs doing with that review?

OCCT is great, but...

1.5v for a QX9650? What's the watts output of that chip when running at 3.7 ghz and that extremely high vcore? I think it exceeds the max specs for those heatpies numbers on BOTH coolers, right? I'm surprised the system didn't reboot in linpack.....

90C sure sounds like the liquid was remaining vaporized in the heatpipes...

And I don't think anyone here has had a QX9650 that required 1.5v :shocked: for just 3.9 ghz...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Falkentyne

What is xbit labs doing with that review?

OCCT is great, but...

1.5v for a QX9650? What's the watts output of that chip when running at 3.7 ghz and that extremely high vcore? I think it exceeds the max specs for those heatpies numbers on BOTH coolers, right? I'm surprised the system didn't reboot in linpack.....

90C sure sounds like the liquid was remaining vaporized in the heatpipes...

And I don't think anyone here has had a QX9650 that required 1.5v :shocked: for just 3.9 ghz...

---

Something really common with HSF reviews: adding voltage for the sake of adding heat. It's basically 'free' heat since power scales with the square of the voltage and adding voltage (to non-stupid levels) doesn't hamper stability either.

And they're probably nowhere near maxing out either HSF :wasntme:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Falkentyne

What is xbit labs doing with that review?

OCCT is great, but...

1.5v for a QX9650? What's the watts output of that chip when running at 3.7 ghz and that extremely high vcore? I think it exceeds the max specs for those heatpies numbers on BOTH coolers, right? I'm surprised the system didn't reboot in linpack.....

90C sure sounds like the liquid was remaining vaporized in the heatpipes...

And I don't think anyone here has had a QX9650 that required 1.5v :shocked: for just 3.9 ghz...

---

A lot of us use more than 1.5v in bench mode

error: Cannot order stuff off .kr

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ar3s

holy crap i can even see your nail hasn't been cut in a long time.... that really clear for a base.

---

:rofl::rofl:

X-Bit reviewed BARAM http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/coo...lab-baram.html

For sure this cooler rocks, in this review, it won true by a marge of 2ºc. Awesome for the price

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ultimeus

A lot of us use more than 1.5v in bench mode

---

I know that
but not at 3.9 or 3.7 ghz....

Either they have the worst chip known to man or it suffered some sort of damage...
The highest I saw it taking a QX to hit 4 ghz was 1.45v....

amazing cooler, espacially the size, smaller than the true and same performance.
where can i get this cooler? i cant find it