http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/9...iller1suy0.jpghttp://img123.imageshack.us/img123/2...iller2soo9.jpg
Heatkiller Rev3.0 looks kinda like EKs Supreme. Let's hope the performance is similar too because the delrin version is pretty cheap.
Printable View
http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/9...iller1suy0.jpghttp://img123.imageshack.us/img123/2...iller2soo9.jpg
Heatkiller Rev3.0 looks kinda like EKs Supreme. Let's hope the performance is similar too because the delrin version is pretty cheap.
Yeah because that isn't a blatant copy...
well heatkiller had a block like that since 06 the supreme came out in 07
the second rev of the heatkiller came out sometime in March 07 as were the supreme was announced sometime in October 07
rev 2.0
http://www.matbe.com/images/biblio/r...0000001330.jpg
rev 2.5
http://www.pcmasters.de/fileadmin/re...den-deckel.jpg
couldnt find a pic of rev 1, anyways looks like a good block, and i like the design
Hi.
Everyone takes what is the best of the competition and implements that into their product.
There is similarity between previous heatkiller versions and supreme, and this 3.0 version has also the unique features of Supreme.
So I am really interested how well it performs :)
Awaiting for good review and comparison.
thanks for that Eddy :up:
nice water blocks......... have you tested already??? This are for Intel or AMD socket?
They have versions for 1366, 775, 754, 939, AM3.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShArKo
Those appear to be some awfully thin channels, pretty nice looking blocks.
They look a lot nicer on the inside than on the outside.
I don't really trust those results.Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowfortrick
http://www.schwarz-muenchen.de/pics/...iag_dfm_53.jpg
http://www.schwarz-muenchen.de/pics/...iag_dfm_85.jpg
http://www.schwarz-muenchen.de/pics/.../diag_k_53.jpg
http://www.schwarz-muenchen.de/pics/.../diag_k_85.jpg
I don't belive it's possible to be less restrictive than the Supreme while still performing better.
Just look at martins block roundup, every block performs within a few degrees of each other. I just don't see how a block could perform several degrees better than the best of all of those blocks. Although I really hope to be proved wrong, then I'll have to build a new core i7 rig just to use this block! :rolleyes:
I suppose if one were to do only one mount of each block and the supreme caught a really bad mount while heatkiller 3 got a really good one it would be possible to get these results.
Beauty is a very subjective thing, I for one like the angly shapes and love the copper top!Quote:
Originally Posted by century child
You raise a good point, that's quite an improvement. Through it would be possible to have less restriction and better performance depending on how many channels there are and the size/height of fins. As always more independent tests are appreciated.
Eddy,Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddy_EK
You are a class act sir. :clap:
I believe these are the guys that hooked Langer up with his blocks in his PrometheusCU build. They make some nice blocks for sure!
Yes Eddy nice way of looking at things as well. :up:
Looks like they used a low head Eheim pump. not really the ideal setup for the EK blockQuote:
Originally Posted by andersson.j
Ok that was unexpected so on with the EK SUPREME V2 OWNAGE RRR FTW EDITION.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddy_EK
I have been playing with the Supreme for some time, I have 20 accelerator plates that are stock and some of the custom ones Eddy made, I have modified the plates alot, and on cooler running blocks having no plate improves performance of the block, as with low flow pumps, but the big shock is by cutting out 2 of the fins in the middle, you improve performance even on high flow pumps! so by having a freeing up the plate a little bit you gain some performance :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by andersson.j
I would still be testing but I have no CPU to test with atm, and im not pulling apart any of my current rigs just to test with, but im looking at a quad core or even an old P4 3.2 or somthing that runs amazingly hot :rolleyes:
as soon as I have the new CPU I will start testing again and start showing off my different designs of the Plate :up:
Good post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddy_EK
Laminar flow designs and pin matrices were in use in the industrial sector for watercooling long before the modern personal computer came into being. I would say nearly every, if not every PC waterblock ever conceived is a copy (whether intentional or accidental).
I'd buy it. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by MomijiTMO
Nice block and uber decent preformance. I bet Micky64īs block will kick ars..es if he ever gets it produced.
I agree,too much gap...but i'll buy it for test it personally,because i already have a supreme on my systemQuote:
Originally Posted by andersson.j
Cooling performance wise, the Heaetkiller 3.0 is the second best water block I ever tested. Due to new tubing for my test equipment, flowrate cannot be compared to old tests, but temperature seems to be within 0.2C with the little higher flowrate, I retested 2 blocks and the measures temps were within 0.2C, but other blocks might behave differently with a change in flowrate, so don't blame me for the results posted below.
Temperature delta:
HK 3.0:
38.8 C (Eheim 1046)
37.2 C (Laing DDC-1T)
EK Supreme:
42.8 C (Eheim 1046)
42.7 C (Laing DDC-1T)
Testing mythology:
Asus Maximus Formula, QX6700 @ 3.46 GHz, 1.5 V, 30 minutes Prime 95, 3-5 mounts depending on variation, listed values are the difference of the average water and the average CPU temperature.
omg:shocked:
Now that is impressive, might have to get me one of these.
Surprisingly the new SCW-Rev.A from Enzotech was even slightly better than the HK 3.0.
The same Enzotech as in Martins review?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fr3ak