Phenom 9950 at nearly 4.5GHz

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-24-2008, 01:26 AM
massman

Phenom 9950 at nearly 4.5GHz

Just spotted this overclock:

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/screenshot/450255.png
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=450255

4 cores, LN2, 1.86v.
11-24-2008, 02:20 AM
pxhx

wow.. i'm wating to Phenom II!!!
11-24-2008, 02:20 AM
FatAlbert

holy crap :eek:

the best cpu on the world ?

cherrypicked from amd ?
11-24-2008, 03:29 AM
redratamd

Very good chip OMG . Some benchs runned ?
11-24-2008, 03:38 AM
George_o/c

:eek2: Owner of the cpu, if you are listening to me, run some benchmarks ! :p: :D
11-24-2008, 03:47 AM
knopflerbruce

Quite a lot of speed between #1 and #2 - 375MHz. We all know that CPUZ has some frequency "glitches" (or what you call it) from time to time, and with such a superior chip I'd say a benchmark run at reasonable speed would be nice to have - just to verify that it's indeed correct. If I ever got a 4.6Ghz FX57 you bet I'd run at least 1m on it, not just do suicides:p:
11-24-2008, 03:55 AM
pump101

I want one!
11-24-2008, 06:08 AM
informal

This is the last batch of B3s,almost a B4 practically.I guess the chip wasn't quite stable for user to run tests,but if knocked off 100-200Mhz he would probably be able to run benchmark tests on it too.
11-24-2008, 06:16 AM
George_o/c

Quote:

Originally Posted by informal

This is the last batch of B3s,almost a B4 practically.I guess the chip wasn't quite stable for user to run tests,but if knocked off 100-200Mhz he would probably be able to run benchmark tests on it too.

Of course it's impossible to run tests at that speed, but at about ~60 - 80MHz lower, he'll for sure be able to run an SPi 1M run, just to clear things up and automatically crush a WR :D ('cause at ~4400MHz, one could crush AMD 1M WR while browsing xtremesystems.org :yepp:)
11-24-2008, 06:20 AM
informal

Quote:

Originally Posted by George_o/c

Of course it's impossible to run tests at that speed, but at about ~60 - 80MHz lower, he'll for sure be able to run an SPi 1M run, just to clear things up and automatically crush a WR :D ('cause at ~4400MHz, one could crush AMD 1M WR while browsing xtremesystems.org :yepp:)

Yep quite true.But don't forget that all that effort will last only about a month or so,since ~3.6Ghz Deneb would destroy that record while browsing xtremesystems.org :D
11-24-2008, 06:25 AM
George_o/c

Actually it's 6 weeks :p:, so I personally think it's kind of cool to have the AMD 1M WR for over a month ;) :D
11-24-2008, 07:27 AM
TheKarmakazi

very nice OC! cant wait for Q1-09 to see some really extreme AMD's
11-24-2008, 09:22 AM
ZoLKoRn

Yaaahoooo nice to see AMD come back to the way :D well hope after Q1-09 we can see more extreme oc from AMD !!! :up:
11-24-2008, 09:26 AM
tiborrr

Major props to whoever achieved this. Really impressive run, this is how Phenoms should clock right at launch.
11-24-2008, 01:35 PM
natedog420

this is great i hope they go higher but that is still good. was thinking of getting the new amd:rolleyes: but not sure. :D
11-24-2008, 01:54 PM
Ozzfest05

some one who clocks that hardcore would obviously post on hwbot considereing highest validation on hwbot is 3.9 I think this is a cpuz glitch
11-24-2008, 02:10 PM
knopflerbruce

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ozzfest05

some one who clocks that hardcore would obviously post on hwbot considereing highest validation on hwbot is 3.9 I think this is a cpuz glitch

I think the same;) I can't remember having seen any WR's that have been THAT superior. Ever. Without any benchmarks it's hard to believe it...
11-24-2008, 02:27 PM
hey

coldbug @ ???
11-24-2008, 02:36 PM
eligray

WARNING TO ALL: Engineering samples and prereleased chips always clock MUCH higher than retail chips, so don't count on it staying like this.
11-24-2008, 03:02 PM
knopflerbruce

Quote:

Originally Posted by eligray

WARNING TO ALL: Engineering samples and prereleased chips always clock MUCH higher than retail chips, so don't count on it staying like this.

This is not the case with AMD or Intel.
11-24-2008, 04:17 PM
cdawall

Quote:

Originally Posted by eligray

WARNING TO ALL: Engineering samples and prereleased chips always clock MUCH higher than retail chips, so don't count on it staying like this.

thats not true i had an E7200es and it clocked no better than any other E7200s

not to mention the 9950 isn't even a ES they are black edition chips which means they are all unlocked multi's
11-24-2008, 04:36 PM
STEvil

Quote:

Originally Posted by eligray

WARNING TO ALL: Engineering samples and prereleased chips always clock MUCH higher than retail chips, so don't count on it staying like this.

Only true during the first release of the CPU's and only part of the time even then.
11-24-2008, 04:54 PM
zif33rs

Amazing OC...congrats to who ever got the golden chip..please post some benches! Think the record over at hwbot is in 4000-4100mhz range. So this crushing anything ive seen.

well done.

zif
11-24-2008, 05:33 PM
HDCHOPPER

personnaly me hopes this comming year is a steller one for AMD !
11-24-2008, 11:56 PM
massman

Quote:

Originally Posted by knopflerbruce

I think the same;) I can't remember having seen any WR's that have been THAT superior. Ever. Without any benchmarks it's hard to believe it...

Yeap, I'm not really buying it myself ... let's hope someone will clear this up :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by eligray

WARNING TO ALL: Engineering samples and prereleased chips always clock MUCH higher than retail chips, so don't count on it staying like this.

It's not a Deneb, it's an Agena

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page