Needs a thread of it's own for a bit, IMHO
thanks Gautam, we both knew that's what it was...confirmation is nice though.
has same on DFI UT X48-T3RS with 400/1333 at first DFI said it's incorrect and should be 400/1200 but then subsequently it is 400/1333 http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?t=6657
could explain low performance on 400/1333 http://i4memory.com/91204-post9.html
http://fileshosts.com/intel/DFI/DFI_...1m37s954ms.png
This should be also on news section.
We do need someone from Intel to comment this.
Just means I have more room to overclock above 600FSB and the "3:5" divider :p:
More room gomeler but worse performance.
ran 620 3:5 400 strap (1033 memory) but notish no difference in performance over 2:3 on auto strap.(930 memory)
strange thing is i need more voltage on the memory to do this though.
Saw exactly this on the Asus P5Q3 in my latest memory (OCZ Flex II) review. Nice to see it confirmed.
thanks guantum i confirm it
this is my test
boot@600
strap :400
dram freq : 1800
and cpuz in win says
http://download.pctuner.net/upload/r..._screen018.jpg
This is on Evolution X48:
http://images4.hiboox.com/images/350...65df7997dc.jpg
cpu-z 1.45 reads it correctly.
Same situation on X48 p5e3 Premium