http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33929391
:clap:
http://www.hardware-infos.com/news.php?news=2292
:shocked:
Printable View
wow thats some nice scaling
maybe they used 8.54 driver??
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredpace
Very impressive scaling indeed.
Link of the review from Chiphell.
Just what you'd need to power this thing
http://www.matrox.com/graphics/en/pr...go_widescreen/
Surprisingly good scaling... I'm somewhat skeptical, but if accurate, this is great news.
wtf chiphell link is 3870x2
Thats a review of the 3870X2, not the 4870X2.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gogeta
Holy siht at the UT3 results!!! 83FPS at 2048x1536 with friggen 8xAA and 16xAF??! That is absolutely insane!!
I am getting two 4870X2s when they come out !!! :yepp::up:
hmm i'll wait for real reviews. I don't trust marketing slides :p:
impressive. it's funny how to begin with the single HD4870X2 has no issues at those insane settings. the second one for current games is a little over the top but this is XtremeSystems and over the top is what we do. however i would wonder how it scales in Crysis considering that game has a nack for bad scaling on new product.
now if we want to talk over the top then we could use 2 of these in crossfireX on a Skulltrail platform loaded with 8GB of RAM. you could run multiple games at once *drools on keyboard*
Those are some ridiculous numbers if true. And I hope so... I have a Rampage Formula lying around and a 30" monitor as well
Glad you tested @ 2560, because to me, that's what this high end is all about. If it can do that well, you can mentally scale it down res/up perf.
Yeah ... my max resolution on my LCD is 1600x1200, so with UT3 at 16x12 with 8xAA and 16xAF and two 4870X2s... :slobber:
I may get a better monitor for 1920x1200, though. And even then, that is way less than 2048x1536 (but still higher than 1080p)!! :yepp:
Over 100% scaling in DMC4 2560x1600. :drool:
These are directly from AMD, I can confirm it. So mountain of salt :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornet331
Why 2 4870x2 then? u can max the fps on that monitor with only 1 card...Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
Forget it. Crysis won't scale at all with more than two GPUs.Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] hipno650
I am just drooling everytime I see results of this card, but when exactly is it supposed to come out??? im clueless... august????:shrug:
If they are from AMD then they used a Phenom cpu....:ROTF:
AMD leaked a vantage extreme score of dual 4870X2s a while back, and it was in the X12k range, higher than the one in the OP actually. And they confirmed somewhere that it was with a phenom.Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkeywoman
So... with dual 4870X2s and my Q9450 @ 3.7-3.9GHz (PLUS the overclocked GPUs as well)... :slobber:
eXa:
Yeah one of them will run it. But the posted framerates were averages... so 50% of the time it was lower, 50% of the time it was higher. Now if I could get UT3 running at 1920x1200 at max graphics, with 8xAA and 16xAF, and never have the minimum framerate drop below say 80... I'd be set! :D
Very nice indeed, this def. catches my eyes, BUT i can tell you one think, with dual GPU, you get a lower MIN FPS sometimes, but a big increase in MAX FPS, thats why you get a higher avg, anyway thats what i exp. with my 4850 crossfire.
What CPU (especially clocks) are they using?
yeah ^^^^^
super h4x. this is awesome, i'm glad AMD can do this.