No speaka Engrish. You look at pictures, now!
http://publish.it168.com/2008/0327/20080327012301.shtml
SSE4 gives a sizeable boost on DivX encoding.
This is a 3-28 review, but a search for it168 came up with nothing so I went ahead and posted.
Printable View
No speaka Engrish. You look at pictures, now!
http://publish.it168.com/2008/0327/20080327012301.shtml
SSE4 gives a sizeable boost on DivX encoding.
This is a 3-28 review, but a search for it168 came up with nothing so I went ahead and posted.
my conclusion: E7300 is full of win. E7300 is pretty damn close to the E8200, but will be cheaper, E4500? no thx been there clocked that sold that, tri core phenom? no comment, E7200, well depending on price difference to E7300 it might be good, but if the difference to E7300 is small then the E7300 is the better deal due to higher mutli.
So these e7x00's are like the wolfdale-allendales? cool
They are indeed - i'm actually looking to get one...its like the C2D cheapness all over again and again, with more sane multipliers!
wait... wait...
you mean that you get diminishing returns as you have more cache in the system? wow that's amazing.
so the difference between 3mb cache and 6mb cache is less than the difference between 2 and 4?
well I be damned, 2% overall performance dif.
somehow, just somehow... I predicted this.
I just "read" the reviewl, lol, look at the Phenom. The E7300 performs quite well even when compared to an E8200.
i really should keep nelson handy
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v5...lson-muntz.gif
+1 e7300ish
E8200 still is better looking for those hoping to extend their e-wieners. :P
I would have liked to see how a 2.6 Ghz Phenom would fare against a couple of 2.6 ghz Intels, not an already slow architecture with a slower clockspeed against an already fast architecture and a faster clockspeed.
Though if the price is right on the E7000 series, we have a sure-fire 45nm winner.
Perkam
well logically speaking if all your data and code fits in the cache, adding extra cache doesn't improve performance... Actually it'll make performance worse.Quote:
Originally Posted by xlink
Isn't a larger Cache important at higher clock speeds? Well at stock 6mb cache may be just too much.
I see e7200's showing up for 100-120euro's, though none of the stores that have them listed have them in stock yet.
E7200's have a 9,5 multiplier right? omfg :shocked:
yes because as the clock speed doubles, the Ram latency effectively doubles in cpu clock cyclesQuote:
Originally Posted by fireice2
Relase date?
I can't read asian. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by keiths
11th may, price 133$
6-8W lower than 8xxx series in idle. :)
...sits down and waits for more reviews.
In june there will be E3xxx series with 1.5MB cache and same FSB. :)
Its chinese. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by KoHaN69
Can you read graphs?Quote:
Originally Posted by KoHaN69
For the tricores, already released... quietly showing up, no reviews...Quote:
Originally Posted by suffocatio
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103252
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103253
For the E7200 who knows, people are saying April 20th other saying May 11th. But the dual core 45 nm has been so slow, trickling out it may be June.
Considering the E8400 is coming in around 209 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115037 then it would appear AMD's triple core CPUs are overpriced.
type translate website in googleQuote:
Originally Posted by KoHaN69
post website address and translate from Chinese simple to English
and you have an english review with yoda style writing :D
Or just right click with IE8 and hit translate. :) Live has a damn good translator.