Printable View
Had a quick look at the Intel site nd it appears that there are two new P4 types listed.....
Core stepping for them id M0, not D1, and the cpuid is 0F25.
The 2.4C/800 is listed as SL6Z3
2.6C/800 is listed as SL6Z4
Does anyone have one of these yet ??
Interesting. Those steppings are not listed on Intel's Spec Finder page.
http://processorfinder.intel.com/scr...+on+selections
Which page were you looking at?
Phalanx28
Do a search for SL6Z3 on that page in the top right corner.....go to the 2nd detailed search find and have a look at the pdf document......all is in there.....also, from another forum, somebody has got a 2.4c running at over 3.5ghz at default volts....looks good !!
More....
Product Change Notification Change Notification #: 103434 - 00 Change Title: Boxed Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor, PCN 103434-00, FYI, Core Stepping Addition M-0 for 2.40C GHz with 800 MHz System Bus Date of Publication: July 24, 2003 Type of Change Notification: FYI - (For Your Information) Key Characteristics of the Change: Product Design Forecasted Key Milestones: Date of First Availability of Post-Conversion Material: Sep 01, 2003 The date of "First Availability of Post-Conversion Material" is the projected date that a customer may expect to receive the Post-Conversion Materials. This date is determined by the projected depletion of inventory at the time of the PCN publication. The depletion of inventory may be impacted by fluctuating supply and demand, therefore, although customers should be prepared to receive the Post-Converted Materials on this date, Intel will continue to ship and customers may continue to receive the pre-converted materials until the inventory has been depleted. Description of Change to the Customer: ·M-0 Core Processor Stepping Change Addition. ·The CPUID will be 0F25h for M-0 Step. ·M-0 step is pin compatible with D-1 step. Customer Impact of Change and Recommended Action: None Products Affected / Intel Ordering Codes: Component Product Table Pre-Conversion Product Code Pre-Conversion Spec/ROMPre-Conversion MM# Post-Conversion Product Code Post-Conversion Spec/ROM Post-Conversion MM# BX80532PG2400D S L6WF S L6WF 852314 BX80532PG2400DSL6Z3 853185 BX80532PG2400D S L6WR S L6WR 852646 BX80532PG2400DSL6Z3 853185 Reference Documents / Attachments: Document: Location #:
PCN Revision History: Date of Revision: Revision Number: Reason: July 15, 2003 00 Originally Published PCN
I was just about to say this has to be in a Product Change .pdf if it's that new. :)
Phalanx28
:D im trying to get a 2.4c SL6Z3 Malay with the lowest vcore i can get, i think, there´s the possibility of a :banana:
OC
:D :D
Quote:
Originally posted by jayray580
:D im trying to get a 2.4c SL6Z3 Malay with the lowest vcore i can get, i think, there´s the possibility of a :banana:
OC
:D :D
i can reach 3.6Ghz with orginal vcore :D mine is malay week 11
thats good,:toast: ,my Malay needs 1.6 volts to run at 3628 Mhz (on Aircooling), stockvoltage 1.525,Quote:
can reach 3.6Ghz with orginal vcore mine is malay week 11
what stockvoltage does ur Malay have ?
:mad: i think, it might b all wrong, prolly the SL6Z3 is a mobile cpu
:sofa:
Does somebody know anything about the new 2,6C SL6WS? Ordered one C30469-004 recently but i haven't got the chance to lay my hands on it yet.
The SL6Z3 model of 2.4C P4 seems to be different from the other 2.4Cs. For instance it has a lot more capacitors on the backside of the CPU and the CPU steppin ID is 5 (it was 9 on my old 2.4C)
gotta see if its a good clocker :D
gotta see if its a good clocker :D
@macci
have u got 1 already? Is it actually 4 normal desktop and 865 or 875 chipset and socket 478?
(too lazy to search and read specs);)
actually it's like a rebagged P4EE (maybe one where the L3 cache failed)Quote:
Originally posted by jayray580
:mad: i think, it might b all wrong, prolly the SL6Z3 is a mobile cpu
:sofa:
http://www.hardforum.com/showthread....hreadid=673354
pic of SL6Z3... http://www.gctl.ca/images/24c.jpg
i ordered another 2.4c this week from newegg and ironically it's this M0 stepping, with the P4EE cap arrangement, i just can't wait to oc this :D :D, too bad i have class today from 2-8 so it's gonna have to wait :(
copy and paste for the pics...
http://www.iupload.net/082003/IMG_1426.jpg
http://www.iupload.net/082003/IMG_1427.jpg
http://www.iupload.net/082003/IMG_1429.jpg
just fired it up quick before i went to class and i hit 3.6ghz, stock voltage, this chip is awesome :D :D
It just looks like the P4EE, the P4EE is M0, tooQuote:
Originally posted by macci
The SL6Z3 model of 2.4C P4 seems to be different from the other 2.4Cs. For instance it has a lot more capacitors on the backside of the CPU and the CPU steppin ID is 5 (it was 9 on my old 2.4C)
gotta see if its a good clocker :D
Thats what i have heard from a Friend, he is a Hardware Tester for www.hardwareluxx.com ( Be Carefull it`s German ;) ).
He got a SL6RZ3, too and both got the same capacitors and Cpuid String except of the L3 Cache...
Awesome m8...plzzz keep us postedQuote:
Originally posted by PureBooYah
just fired it up quick before i went to class and i hit 3.6ghz, stock voltage, this chip is awesome :D :D
Any word of the 2.6 yet?
Is the SL6WS and SL6WH new 2.6 ones also?
Or is it just the SL6Zx ones?
Cheers :)
did you order retail or oem
Quote:
Originally posted by PureBooYah
i ordered another 2.4c this week from newegg and ironically it's this M0 stepping, with the P4EE cap arrangement, i just can't wait to oc this :D :D, too bad i have class today from 2-8 so it's gonna have to wait :(
copy and paste for the pics...
http://www.iupload.net/082003/IMG_1426.jpg
http://www.iupload.net/082003/IMG_1427.jpg
http://www.iupload.net/082003/IMG_1429.jpg
i ordered retail
well, i'm quite impressed by this chip, it's soooo much better than my other 2.4c.
i got up to 3.55ghz (295fsb) with stock voltage and that was stable, but it took 1.725v to get up to 3.6ghz stable
i think the reason for this was how much my board undervolts when under load...i have it at 1.725v in the bios, but that is overvolted to 1.744v at idle, then it drops to 1.616v under load (i have it in my p4c800-e not my ic7). oh well, i'm happy :banana:
also anything over 300fsb, my computer slows down to a crawl once i'm in windows and it crashes (explorer uses 50% of the cpu until the crash) but at 300fsb its prime stable...i also heard ATi cards don't like fsb over 300, could this be the reason?
Will have to get one from newegg and hope it is the new stepping.;)
I was this fact alone that made me decide to NOT grab this chip. I think my theory has been proven that these chips are actually 3.2 P4EE that did not make the requirements, so they got binned as 2.4. This can be seen with the easy OC to 3.5 with default volts but then the huge increase needed to get just another measly 100mhz. :)Quote:
Originally posted by PureBooYah
i got up to 3.55ghz (295fsb) with stock voltage and that was stable, but it took 1.725v to get up to 3.6ghz stable
i think the reason for this was how much my board undervolts when under load...i have it at 1.725v in the bios, but that is overvolted to 1.744v at idle, then it drops to 1.616v under load (i have it in my p4c800-e not my ic7). oh well, i'm happy :banana:
I assume u mean default volts in bios so that drops to ~1.45load (based on your 1.725 drop) and then you say you need 1.725bios which is 1.61load so there is a .15 increase in vcore to just get 100mhz :)
Nice chips, but imo not as *great* as everyone is making them out to be ;)
Dont flame me, this is my opinion, Im not disrespecting you PureBooYah, just commenting on the stepping chip you have :thumbsup:
Cheers
my reply from the H...Quote:
Originally posted by Creative
I was this fact alone that made me decide to NOT grab this chip. I think my theory has been proven that these chips are actually 3.2 P4EE that did not make the requirements, so they got binned as 2.4. This can be seen with the easy OC to 3.5 with default volts but then the huge increase needed to get just another measly 100mhz. :)
I assume u mean default volts in bios so that drops to ~1.45load (based on your 1.725 drop) and then you say you need 1.725bios which is 1.61load so there is a .15 increase in vcore to just get 100mhz :)
Nice chips, but imo not as *great* as everyone is making them out to be ;)
Dont flame me, this is my opinion, Im not disrespecting you PureBooYah, just commenting on the stepping chip you have :thumbsup:
Cheers
oh i totally agree with you, and yes my vcore drops to 1.45v underload when i have it set to default :(. and this is a good chip, but a great chip would do 300fsb+ w/stock voltage...i wouldn't flame, i agree, but i'm just happy to hit the 300fsb mark. :D
Oh nah man 300fsb is AWESOME :banana:
Noone can take that away from you bud....you made it to 300fsb so pat yourself on the back and have a :toast:
I'm going to need a couple 2.4C's here, you guys think I should put in an order at the 'egg today or wait until next week?