Thermochill PA120.3 Pressure Drop Test Results
Finally got my hands on this famous radiator. A special thanks goes out to Danger Den for providing me the radiator to test with.:clap:
With all the talk I've heard about reducers around the G3/8" threading, I took this one a step further and tested with two configurations. One was with EK's G3/8" barbs that the good folks at watercoolingshop.com provided to me. They also sent me a set of G3/8" to G1/4" reducers so I could hook up my favorite Danger Den Fatboy barbs on the radiator and test that as well.:up:
Here is the full scoop on my site with more details and pictures:
http://www.martinsliquidlab.com/Ther..._3-Review.html
And the executive summary below:
http://www.martinsliquidlab.com/img/...lPA120_3-1.jpg
And the two tests compared to the Thermochill published results as well as the MCR320 and prototype Feser 120.3.
http://www.martinsliquidlab.com/img/...-PDcompare.png
My results fall inline with the published, actually thermochills published results only went out to 2.0 GPM, so anything beyond that is interpolated from a trendline. The EK barbs were very very slightly more restrictive, and the adapters with Danger Den's Fatboy barbs was slightly less restrictive. The large ID and chamfered edges of the Fatboy barbs as well as the reducers gave it a little edge here.
In the end, my test results are very similar to those that are published
To put this to some sort of scale just one D-Tek Fuzion with 4.5mm nozzle has about 21X the restriction as one PA120.3. I would highly recommend running two or three or more of these in series if heat dissipation becomes an issue as they will have very very little effect on flow rate.
Now we just need to get some good thermal testing done..:)
Cheers!:spill:
Martin