http://i4.tinypic.com/853bwy1.png
You can do this test at home on your system, you will see how Phenom X4 perform ...
Config: RD-790FX, Phenom @default 2.4GHz, 2GB RAM, HD3870 ...
Printable View
http://i4.tinypic.com/853bwy1.png
You can do this test at home on your system, you will see how Phenom X4 perform ...
Config: RD-790FX, Phenom @default 2.4GHz, 2GB RAM, HD3870 ...
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcmv=3125
Q6600 @ 2.4GHz; 2GB, 8800GTX
Quote:
PCMarkSuite 4973 PCMarks
Memories Suite 4445
TV and Movies Suite 4154
Gaming Suite 4706
Music Suite 4478
Communications Suite 4138
Productivity Suite 4570
HDD Test Suite 4275
Hm, very competitive scores! At the same frequencies ...
Strange that memory seems so weak on phenom?
What's interesting is the "gaming" score. Any reason for this?
2*64bit mode may be selected in bios.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoThr3k
i think it's score better with 128 bits mode :D
It was 128-bit mode ... This is setting before test ...
http://i9.tinypic.com/6jzggut.png
OBR thanks for the results,but couldn't you get a cas4 DDR2 ram?Today ,you can even get cheap cas4 DDR2-800 1GB modules.
As for mem. tests ,Phenom should have better mem. scores than AthlonX2.Don't know if it is BIOS setting,but your scores seem a bit low.
so its scores better then a C2D paired with a much more heavier GFX?:D
Pwned :D
Sweet, AMD can finally almost keep up with Intel's last generation offerings. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by BeardyMan
Everybody knows Nvidia Vista drivers are crap. I'd also like to see same graphics card used for both tests at same resolutions, and same OS environment, 32bit or 64bit.
Yep and intel's "new gen" products really pwn Conroe/kentsfield ,by a whole ~6% or so on average.
Well you see a higher score for phenom than for the c2d paired with a much more heavier GFX?Quote:
Originally Posted by BeardyMan
:D
Yep it's a kentfield not a conroe ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by nemrod
C2D=>C2Q :D
Since when is 3870 faster than 8800GTX :p: and since when c2d has 4 cores :p: ?Quote:
Originally Posted by nemrod
I like it. The offering may not be on top of Intel, but it will offer alternatives of OEM computer companies and hopefully driving some competition into the market with the Phenom/790FX platform.
Also, first post :)
:welcome:
looks like its gunna be sweet!
its a little faster then the Q6600. works for me:yepp:
Before NDA ends i can tell this: At the same frequencies are Phenom X4 and Kensfield (Yorkfield is better anyway) very close, and performance is almost the same ... BUT, Phenoms cant to overclock so easily like Kensfield ... that a problem. My max stable Phenom is about 3GHz ... and Kensfield 3.6GHz and more ...
Well seeing how the Q6600 overclocks well over 1Ghz, then.....Phenom does suck. Not to mention Yorkfield.Quote:
Originally Posted by knightwolf654
Like a 400Mhz overclock compared to 1.4Ghz overclock. Yea. That could be problematic.
Is it crossfire or a single card?Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
In this case not the Phenom or the actual CPU architecture suck, but the manufacturing process and maximal transistors switch speed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim
Don't know how score the hd3870 on pcmark vantage...But you're right I've missed that it was a traditionnal AMD biased comparison... Compare a cpu with the same price, and the same number of core that a quad to a duo... :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by informal
But at least orb give us a clear information:"At the same frequencies are Phenom X4 and Kensfield (Yorkfield is better anyway) very close, and performance is almost the same"
for people who do not overclock, yorkfield will be better, so AMD loses here
for people who do oc, yorkfield is better and even kentsfield.
rough times for AMD...
I dont really seeing a point in going for this chip since Q6600 can overclock 1ghz and will be out performing it. If you plan to run stock thats a different story though
Pgi 7.1 :d