I dunno if these can be trusted, but someone else at a different forum showed these to me and I thought you guys might like to see them
http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread...=158813&page=1
What do you guys think
Printable View
I dunno if these can be trusted, but someone else at a different forum showed these to me and I thought you guys might like to see them
http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread...=158813&page=1
What do you guys think
:BS:
CPU-Z wouldn't recognize the CPUs yet... not true...
that's my train of thought, the only problem with that is coolaler does have a reputation of getting es chips before anyone else, but the cpuzs seem fake to me
CPUZ picks the chips up and they are in the wild.
perhaps, but we know for a fact that there are 45nm es chips out there because mobo manufacturers have begin designing bioses for them, here's asus's list of supported mobos
http://event.asus.com/mb/45nm/
The screenshots are likely legitimate. The latest version of CPU-Z does in fact read Yorkfield correctly. I've seen other similar screenshots.
Those are legit.
I added a poll, this will make it clear what everyone thinks of them
They said it needed an upgrade to recognize them correctly (at least I think..Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor22
some posts point to that)
http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php
1.40.5 07/06/2007
* NVIDIA nForce 560 chipset support (1.40.5)
* Intel Dynamic FSB technology support (1.40.5)
* Athlon 64 X2 BE & Sempron LE (TDP 45W) (1.40.5)
* SiS671/FX/DX/MX northbridge support (1.40.5)
* SiS968 southbridge support (1.40.5)
* VIA P4M800CE chipset support.
* Preliminary support for Intel Penryn CPUs family (45 nm).
* Intel Core 2 Duo E6x20, Pentium E2140/2160 processors recognition.
* Intel P35, G33, G31, Q35, Q33, X38 chipsets support.
* Intel GL960/GM965/PM965 chipsets support.
* AMD Athlon 64 "Lima" processor support.
* AMD Geode LX processor support.
* NVIDIA nForce 520 chipset support.
* New parameter "-console" to generate output in a command prompt (Windows XP only).
* New icon, courtesy of Techlogica.
looks like these might actually be legit!
I think these are legit.
Just wondering baron, you wouldn't happen to be baron matrix at toms hardware? If you are, I find that kinda ironic, if not, then it doesn't matter
2.33 is in line with the cpus tested by MSI. What score does a Core2 get in 3dmark06 @ 2.33?
only a 7x multiplier... That's kinda restrictive.
Ryan
yeah, but supposedly x38 will make up for that, I mean p35's already hit 672fsb (victor wang and oskur wu did it), it's only so long before we see 700fsb, which would mean 4.9ghz which is pretty nice for a low end chip
well if that's the case I'll shut up. I wasn't aware the p35 would go that far. Is that a DFI thing? How far would another brand go, say, Abit?
Ryan
I hear the i35 pro is supposed to be very good too, but for once asus seems to have gotten it almost right with the p5k series, I would also recommend those boards too (just not anywhere near dfi's). I expect to start seeing a few good things from foxconn too. Why? Because they got a crap load of dfi's engineers within the last year, so hopefully things will improve for them
here's the wr
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=152099
Actually I believe this is the current record.;)Quote:
Originally Posted by AliG
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=220153
When looking at CPU-Z v1.40.5 I found this, so, I'm pretty sure it does detect it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raptor22
http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/8...olfdalenf8.jpg
out of all 12 pages of that thread here's the best pics
http://www.coolaler.com.tw/toppc/45NM/500PI.JPG
http://www.coolaler.com.tw/toppc/45NM/50006.JPG
http://www.coolaler.com.tw/toppc/45NM/540PI.JPG
3.7 @ 1.1v. Wow.
Ryan
http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/hwdb.php?ti...iew&rid=837360
Wolfdale benchmarks. Nothing more there to argue about. Also matches Intels early preview show :p:
I doubt that is a correct Vcore reported in CPUz.I don't say it is not possible,i just doubt it :).