-
2.33G Yorkfield spi test 19.750 sec
-
Just over a second and a half faster than conroe clock for clock
-
any chance we will get to see 7x500 on these chips?
-
It's about 10% faster than 4MB conroe clock for clock in spi. I'd say a 5% gain from the additional L2 and 5% from architecture enhancement.
-
I would say SSE4 doesn't give any improovements to SPi. It's all in cache/bus speed
-
that looks bloody fast to me :D
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zaarath
It's about 10% faster than 4MB conroe clock for clock in spi. I'd say a 5% gain from the additional L2 and 5% from architecture enhancement.
10% faster with 50% more Cache and 15% larger SSE set.
-
kinda slow cpumark, only 5% faster clock for clock if I am right...
-
Is that 50ºC idle?
Pretty impressive chips.
-
wonder how far it'll overclock tho
-
Can't wait to see yorkfield in all of its oc'ed glory!! That looks quite fast for a 2.33 ghz
-
I want to see some oc's :)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
massman
I want to see some oc's :)
Very soon..;)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
revogamer
wonder how far it'll overclock tho
The billion dollar question we all want to see answered :cool:
-
hmmm its nice to see improvements but with g0 steppings comin out the door now it pains me to have 2 choose between these 2.
-
lookin good so far....def holding out for one of these.
-
Sorry for the dumb question but I'll do it anyway: is it compatible with socket 775?
What about memory support: only DDR3 or DDR2 also?
I'm trying to understand if this is already the new chip from Intel that has the integrated memory controller or it still uses the Conroe architecture only with some improvements.
-
ineedaname,
Yorkfield won't be out until Q4 so there's plenty of time for anyone to play around with G0. Don't you think?
Viper.Br,
Penryn a Conroe shrink/derivate, it has no IMC on it.
It's compatible with DDR2 and DDR3 P35 boards and atleast some i965P boards.
-
WTF? im running those times with 2.8ghz e6300 7 x 400..........damn and thats only running 2.3 something wrong with my set up or something? or is the 2m cache really hurting it.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tvdang7
WTF? im running those times with 2.8ghz e6300 7 x 400..........damn and thats only running 2.3 something wrong with my set up or something? or is the 2m cache really hurting it.
well have I had to guess, your memory is running slow compared to it
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tvdang7
WTF? im running those times with 2.8ghz e6300 7 x 400..........damn and thats only running 2.3 something wrong with my set up or something? or is the 2m cache really hurting it.
it's just the extra cache man helping in 1M
try comparing 32M and you will see there will be very little difference
-
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dinos22
it's just the extra cache man helping in 1M
try comparing 32M and you will see there will be very little difference
Yea......about 45sec in 32M..... VERY little difference..... :D :p:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bigchrome
Just over a second and a half faster than conroe clock for clock
I suppose that's good, but this is why I'm telling people with g0 quadcores to hold tight. Penryn is just a die shrink with sse4 and less transistor leakage, so while performance may slightly increase, the only real benefits are the lower temps and power consumption. And honestly, unless you must have the high end or are a professional ocer like shamino, I think waiting for native octo cores (nehalem) will be the smart move. but this is coming from a person with a small budget and an am2 system
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hipro5
Yea......about 45sec in 32M..... VERY little difference..... :D :p:
Good one! :D
