-
First Penryn (wolfdale) Numbers
-
So a 2.7ghz dual core penryn does the same superpi time as a 3.7ghz e6600 or e6700! But there is a 2mb advantage so probably equal to a 3.5 ghz e6600 if the e6600 had another 2mb... P5k deluxe mobo is compatible...
-
i dont really think that 1M run was at 2.66GHz
-
why not? the difference between a E6400 and E6600 in the same overclock, same board, and same ram, even in 1M is pretty drastic.
another 2 megs to the cache, would be no different.
4 megs to 6 megs would be a nice jump for PI.
-
thanks for the numbers :) it looks like a winner with 6MBs of L2
-
Look at the other shots from Everest.... they are actually lower than a E6700 at same speed? Hows that?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kunaak
why not? the difference between a E6400 and E6600 in the same overclock, same board, and same ram, even in 1M is pretty drastic.
another 2 megs to the cache, would be no different.
4 megs to 6 megs would be a nice jump for PI.
True but everest is on par with C2D, i just dont want to make false hopes, if it does that time great :)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KiD0M4N
Look at the other shots from Everest.... they are actually lower than a E6700 at same speed? Hows that?
What I was thinking
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KiD0M4N
Look at the other shots from Everest.... they are actually lower than a E6700 at same speed? Hows that?
Board , BIOS , etc...I wouldn't be worried about that.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kunaak
why not? the difference between a E6400 and E6600 in the same overclock, same board, and same ram, even in 1M is pretty drastic.
another 2 megs to the cache, would be no different.
4 megs to 6 megs would be a nice jump for PI.
I agree. Assuming the extra cache allows full performance scaling and isnt bottlenecked by something else, and SSE4 does its thing, it should take towards 2 secs off a Spi 1M time compared to a 4MB Conroe at the same clocks.
Penryn @ 3600MHz should be around....12-12.2 secs?
-
looks yammy.. cant wait until they are out.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
K404
SSE4 does...
...nothing for SuperPi Mod v1.5 ;)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metro.cl
True but everest is on par with C2D, i just dont want to make false hopes, if it does that time great :)
SSE4 is fairly new. Is it not possible that his beta copy of Everest is not optimize to run SSE4?
-
The radix and shuffle engine can help on any version of SSE. But I dont see superpi as one.
-
Results with OC would be nice :).
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
M3kk
Results with OC would be nice :).
My thought exactly :D
Great information metro, as always :up:
//Andreas
-
I'd like to see what yorkfield has to offer.
-
Remember those SSE2/SSE3 versions of SuperPi? Maybe thatīs the answer.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NH|Delph1
My thought exactly :D
Great information metro, as always :up:
//Andreas
I hope the news about OC ability are just tales :P.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
safan80
I'd like to see what yorkfield has to offer.
is yorkfield supposed to be > wolfdale?
-
it's the quad-core version of wolfdale
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
safan80
it's the quad-core version of wolfdale
Ahh, that makes sense, thanks
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Eastcoasthandle
SSE4 is fairly new. Is it not possible that his beta copy of Everest is not optimize to run SSE4?
Look at the second Everest benchmark.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
M3kk
Results with OC would be nice :).
assuming it overclocks (well)
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nn_step
assuming it overclocks (well)
(nn_step cringes at the thought that the pic of super pi was done at 2666mhz,sells AMD stock, applies for job with Intel, shot at door as a suspected spy!)
If those SP1M times were at 2666mhz then Penryn is what it's claimed to be.
If at 3000 it's still a very nice increase.
Does make you want to get one and try for 8x500 though!:D
Thanks for the info Metro!:toast:
