Micron ddr2-667 2g*2 D9FTB review. ddr2-1000 4338 1m

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-10-2007, 04:10 AM
VictorWang

Micron ddr2-667 2g*2 D9FTB review. ddr2-1000 4338 1m

Micron DDR2-667 2G*2
tested on Asus P5B-deluxe wifi/ap mod, and Foxconn nv680i.
http://vic.expreview.com/attachment/1173526626_1.jpg

More here: http://vic.expreview.com/read.php?102
on Asus P5B-dlx
ddr2-780 3338
ddr2-900 4338
ddr2-933 4435
ddr2-960 4445

on Foxconn nv680i
ddr2-800 4328 1t
ddr2-1000 4338 2t
ddr2-1022 5338 2t
03-10-2007, 05:40 AM
msimax

nice work man. i just saw some d9ftb float past me anyway what voltage are you using?
03-10-2007, 06:45 AM
billdavis

awsome
________
BUY HERBALAIRE VAPORIZER
03-10-2007, 09:49 AM
Rone

Those are 1Gbit Fatbody ICs. Very nice results. :toast:
03-10-2007, 11:09 AM
LexLuther

As your say 667 D9 FTB, then is that a DQT right?
anybody, what do you think the diffrence among the DQT & DQW about performance.

DQT is better than DQW ? and the diffrence of product line 11 and 32 ?
03-10-2007, 11:22 AM
EnJoY

Quote:

Originally Posted by r00n

Those are 1Gbit Fatbody ICs. Very nice results. :toast:

These are not traditional fat bodies. Even the production date will tell you that if nothing else did.

I'm assuming these are just Micron's latest offering in the 128MB IC market.
03-10-2007, 11:26 AM
guess2098

those FTB MT doesn't make it anymore
03-10-2007, 11:36 AM
Rone

Quote:

Originally posted by EnJoY

These are not traditional fat bodies. Even the production date will tell you that if nothing else did.

I'm assuming these are just Micron's latest offering in the 128MB IC market.

Don't tell me you've forgotten why Fatbodies are called Fatbodies.
They were called Fatbodies because their dimensions were 19x11mm, typical for Micron BT-x ICs.
D9FTB is also part of the BT-family, its dimensions are also 19x11mm, therefore they are Fatbodies.

It has nothing to do with overclockability or comparability to other Fatbody ICs.
03-10-2007, 11:40 AM
EnJoY

Quote:

Originally Posted by r00n

Those are 1Gbit Fatbody ICs. Very nice results. :toast:

Quote:

Originally Posted by r00n

Dont tell me you've forgotten why Fatbodies are called Fatbodies.
They were called Fatbodies because their dimensions were 19x11mm, typical for Micron BT-x ICs.
D9FTB is also part of the BT-family, its dimensions are also 19x11mm, therefore they are Fatbodies.

No no...I realize this. However, when you say Fatbody around here, everyone gets a certain idea about what chips from what generation you're referring too. I just wanted to clarify that these weren't double density D9DQT.
03-10-2007, 11:41 AM
EnJoY

Quote:

Originally Posted by guess2098

those FTB MT doesn't make it anymore

Hmm...maybe Victor should give the story behind these before we all make anymore incorrect assumptions then. :p:
03-10-2007, 11:46 AM
Rone

Quote:

Originally posted by EnJoY

No no...I realize this. However, when you say Fatbody around here, everyone gets a certain idea about what chips from what generation you're referring too.

Sadly enough, that is true.

Quote:

I just wanted to clarify that these weren't double density D9DQT.

So did I. Guess it has been cleared up, then. ;)
03-10-2007, 06:41 PM
VictorWang

lol....D9FTB has the same size as D9DQT/D9DQW.
but...not the same overclk ability, neither timings/clks.
I think it maybe 2*Small D9 combine together :D

I got this pair from a mobo RD, and u cannot find info. for D9FTB on Micon's website.
it's micron send to some mobo vendor for compability test, I think.
03-10-2007, 07:12 PM
Rone

Quote:

Originally posted by VictorWang

I got this pair from a mobo RD, and u cannot find info. for D9FTB on Micon's website.

Of course you can. It's right here: http://www.micron.com/products/partd...MT47H128M8BT-3
03-10-2007, 07:25 PM
skate2snow

Quote:

Originally Posted by r00n

Of course you can. It's right here: http://www.micron.com/products/partd...MT47H128M8BT-3

...And those are not D9FTB...
03-10-2007, 07:31 PM
theelectic

Quote:

Originally Posted by msimax

nice work man. i just saw some d9ftb float past me anyway what voltage are you using?

Click on extra link in OP, all tests 2.6V.
03-10-2007, 11:37 PM
guess2098

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorWang

lol....D9FTB has the same size as D9DQT/D9DQW.
but...not the same overclk ability, neither timings/clks.
I think it maybe 2*Small D9 combine together :D

I got this pair from a mobo RD, and u cannot find info. for D9FTB on Micon's website.
it's micron send to some mobo vendor for compability test, I think.

actually i bought this at early 2006 when fat9 still around from egg. then they stop all fat (include this 128x8) and move to new gen
03-11-2007, 04:27 AM
Rone

Quote:

Originally posted by skate2snow

...And those are not D9FTB...

According to Micron they are. Do you have a better source? :rolleyes:

http://www.infinityx.nl/upload/D9FTB.jpg
03-11-2007, 06:14 PM
VictorWang

lol...then I must did a wrong search :D
sorry
03-11-2007, 11:00 PM
over@locker886

hmm, It seems better than D9HNL..what did you use voltage?
03-19-2007, 08:44 AM
EnJoY

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorWang

lol...then I must did a wrong search :D
sorry

I think that pic is of the ES. Micron uses different codes for their ES samples, such as Z9 = D9.
03-19-2007, 11:22 AM
Rone

Quote:

Originally Posted by EnJoY

I think that pic is of the ES. Micron uses different codes for their ES samples, such as Z9 = D9.

No. DDR2 Engineering Samples generally have a Z9xxx FBGA-code, but the Part Number will always have 'ES' in it, as shown in this picture:

http://www.infinityx.nl/upload/Z9BQT.jpg

This is not the case with D9FTB, which simply isn't an ES.
03-19-2007, 11:40 AM
SMa

could you tell us which voltage you were using? :)
03-19-2007, 04:37 PM
KingThot

Quote:

Originally Posted by SMa

could you tell us which voltage you were using? :)

I think he stated 2.6v somewhere above. I just snagged 2 2GB stick of this stuff on ebay. I'll post results when I test it. Got it for $278 so I think I got a decent deal for a 4GB kit.
01-18-2008, 01:17 AM
aussie-revhead

Any more updates on these rams guys ? I know its nearly a year on from the last posts but I just traded a pair of 2GB Kingston 667 with D9FTB chips , so Im keen to see if they perform.

:up:
01-19-2008, 06:18 AM
Don_Dan

Quote:

Originally Posted by aussie-revhead

Any more updates on these rams guys ? I know its nearly a year on from the last posts but I just traded a pair of 2GB Kingston 667 with D9FTB chips , so Im keen to see if they perform.

:up:

Make sure to post some results yourself! :)

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page