nForce 650i SLI vs. nForce 680i SLI !!Same Performance!! (56K Friendly)

Printable View

02-28-2007, 02:27 PM
HamidFULL

nForce 650i SLI vs. nForce 680i SLI !!Same Performance!! (56K Friendly)

Hardware
- Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 (2.66GHz) LGA775
- x2 1024MB Corsair XMS PC-6400 CAS4 Module(s)
- ASUS Striker Extreme (nForce 680i SLI)
- ASUS P5N-E SLI (nForce 650i SLI)
- OCZ GameXStream (700 watt)
- Seagate 250GB 7200RPM (Serial ATA II)
- ASUS GeForce 8800 GTX (768MB) SLI

General Performance + Memory Performance :

http://www.techspot.com/articles-inf.../Memory_01.png

http://www.techspot.com/articles-inf...nch/CPU_01.png

http://www.techspot.com/articles-inf...nch/CPU_03.png

http://www.techspot.com/articles-inf...nch/CPU_04.png

Gaming :

http://www.techspot.com/articles-inf...h/Games_02.png

http://www.techspot.com/articles-inf...h/Games_04.png

http://www.techspot.com/articles-inf...h/Games_03.png

Software
- Microsoft Windows XP Pro (SP2)
- Intel System Drivers 7.2.2
- Nvidia nForce 680i SLI 9.53
- Nvidia nForce 650i 8.26
- Nvidia Forceware 97.92

Quote:

In our opinion the nForce 650i SLI packs all the essential features, offering gamers the ultimate in performance when coupled with a Core 2 Duo processor. With motherboards such as the P5N-E SLI available at just $130, it makes building a powerful gaming rig very affordable when you consider that an E6300 costs just $180. Combined with a GeForce 8800 GTS and a gigabyte or two of memory, you've got have yourself the foundation of an incredible system

Source
02-28-2007, 07:49 PM
Danger30Q

This is the reason why I'm anxiously awaiting the 650i Abit version called FP-IN9. Sure it's got the Fatal1ty marketing but it's a simple and clean looking board that will likely have similar results as the Asus.

I'm still waiting for the USA release and when I get one I'll post a short review here.
02-28-2007, 08:32 PM
jimborae

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danger30Q

This is the reason why I'm anxiously awaiting the 650i Abit version called FP-IN9. Sure it's got the Fatal1ty marketing but it's a simple and clean looking board that will likely have similar results as the Asus.

I'm still waiting for the USA release and when I get one I'll post a short review here.

Got my FP-IN9 yesterday, now just need some spare time to tear down my current rig & install the board. Hopefully it will be better than the Asus board.
03-01-2007, 10:12 AM
HamidFULL

Where is Biostar 650i?
03-01-2007, 10:23 AM
revenant

Damn dude... the MSI P6N Plat is lookin so good right about now.. lol. I guess the 680i boards tend to offer much better voltage control for mem/cpus, as in, beefier PWMs and such.. but I guess that might not be worth 200 extra bucks.. some of those 650 boards are only like $125... great performance to price ratio.
03-01-2007, 11:29 AM
Leeghoofd

looking forward for some results of fatal1ty board mate
03-01-2007, 03:48 PM
RealTelstar

I like the "hybrid" 650i of the Asus P5N32E-SLI Plus.
I find pointless to do SLI at 8x. I would pick the good intel boards over any true 650i out there.
03-01-2007, 03:56 PM
irev210

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealTelstar

I like the "hybrid" 650i of the Asus P5N32E-SLI Plus.
I find pointless to do SLI at 8x. I would pick the good intel boards over any true 650i out there.

I dont really understand why it is pointless?

It is priced lower than most 965 based chipsets and offers way better video performance.

Wait for R600, im sure the 975 will have a bit more life brought to it b4 bearlake replaces it. It is a shame that nvidia is too arrogant to release drivers for SLI on Intel based chipsets.

Besides, with the 650i, just overclock the crap out of the PCI-E bus!
03-01-2007, 03:59 PM
couppi

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealTelstar

I like the "hybrid" 650i of the Asus P5N32E-SLI Plus.
I find pointless to do SLI at 8x. I would pick the good intel boards over any true 650i out there.

I don't see how it's pointless. The performance is nearly identical between the two.
03-01-2007, 04:07 PM
RealTelstar

Quote:

Originally Posted by irev210

I dont really understand why it is pointless?

It is priced lower than most 965 based chipsets and offers way better video performance.

Wait for R600, im sure the 975 will have a bit more life brought to it b4 bearlake replaces it. It is a shame that nvidia is too arrogant to release drivers for SLI on Intel based chipsets.

Good points, but I think AMD planned to release it along with the R600.
Pointless is a bit too much to say, but I dont find it an exciting chipset offering much more of the 965/975 currently.

I wish nvidia had SLI drivers for intel boards. I would have bought one already ;)
03-01-2007, 05:11 PM
serialk11r

I'm wondering if p5n32e plus will have similar results, because I want one...
03-02-2007, 01:30 AM
HamidFULL

Quote:

I wish nvidia had SLI drivers for intel boards. I would have bought one already

Me too! also if you paly in high-res and plus AA and AF dual x16 is same with dual x8
03-02-2007, 10:41 AM
GAR

650i best gaming board for the price period!
03-02-2007, 10:53 AM
shimmishim

i'm kind of surprised by these results

i remember someone did a test of 2 sli'ed 8800gtx(s) and found that at the higher resolutions, the 16x link width starts to pull noticeably ahead of the 8x link width of the 650i.
03-02-2007, 11:20 AM
RealTelstar

Quote:

Originally Posted by serialk11r

I'm wondering if p5n32e plus will have similar results, because I want one...

It performs same if not better than the striker. I dont have the review at hand, but those were the conclusions.
03-02-2007, 11:22 AM
RealTelstar

Quote:

Originally Posted by HamidFULL

Me too! also if you paly in high-res and plus AA and AF dual x16 is same with dual x8

Well I play at 1600x1200 and later this year at 1920x1600.

I'm waiting for the MSI* and DFI 680 boards because I need two pci-33 slots usable, when doing SLI. [* one with this cause it has x-fi on board]
03-02-2007, 12:12 PM
HamidFULL

Quote:

RealTelstar
Well I play at 1600x1200 and later this year at 1920x1600.
I'm waiting for the MSI* and DFI 680 boards because I need two pci-33 slots usable, when doing SLI. [* one with this cause it has x-fi on board]

for you that have 8800GTX in SLi dual X16 is needed but for me that play @ 1280x1024 dual x8 is enough!
03-02-2007, 12:16 PM
p0tter

From Anandtech,

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c171/wangerin/SLI.png

Id rather have the 650i
03-02-2007, 07:48 PM
Heidfirst

Quote:

Originally Posted by shimmishim

i remember someone did a test of 2 sli'ed 8800gtx(s) and found that at the higher resolutions, the 16x link width starts to pull noticeably ahead of the 8x link width of the 650i.

I saw that too.
Most noticeable iirc was the difference in minimum fps (something like 300%).
03-03-2007, 01:45 AM
largon

http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=4450&s=10

1.8-21% penalty in games.
0.2% penalty in 3dMark06 @ 2560x1600 NoAA + 16AF.
03-03-2007, 03:42 AM
LuckyNV

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heidfirst

I saw that too.
Most noticeable iirc was the difference in minimum fps (something like 300%).

IMO, if they have SLI 8800GTX, they probably would have top range everything else...
03-03-2007, 09:12 AM
Gam3Ra

[H] review don't show same results. but mobo is still good, 2x the price for 680i mobo :woot:
I'm planing to change my P5B-D for P5N-E :banana: