-
Intel 2 Quad QX6700@4.4GHz : Update! result
-
Wow, thats some pretty nice scores :). And a good set of benchmarks, grats!
What cooling were you using?
-
nice
can you check with cpu-z 1.35 or 1.36, think 1 die is stil running 10x315 .
maybe the gigabyte changes both die on multi 14 but didn't see any board do that yet.
please try it
-
Really Nice results :toast:
-
Very nice for kentsfield. What cooling do you use?
-
OMG...Can I have that chip for 1 week?:banana:
-
วู้ !!! ท่าน Crazy... มันแรงจน AquaMark3 อ่านค่า GFX กับค่า CPU ไม่ออกเลยเรอะเนี่ย ???
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Friday~13rd
วู้ !!! ท่าน Crazy... มันแรงจน AquaMark3 อ่านค่า GFX กับค่า CPU ไม่ออกเลยเรอะเนี่ย ???
English please....
-
sweet.. can you run pcmark05 suite + cpu tests as well to compare
-
Where's PCMark04 , 05 ___ SuperPI 32M ___ SP04 .
Unstable ????? ___ you just fake ,with the world's PEOPLE. :slapass:
-
are all 4 cores running the same speed with the mult set at 14?
You can check with cpuz 1.5
-
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by BilLiZe
Where's PCMark04 , 05 ___ SuperPI 32M ___ SP04 .
Unstable ????? ___ you just fake ,with the world's PEOPLE. :slapass:
Why ur word look so serious?
I'm Just try to play with it and no reason to make a fake result. :)
NO. 04,05,SuperPI 32M,SP04 didn't mean it fake.
and when i've more time I'll test 04,05,SuperPI 32M,SP04 If it not stable on that program I can say it not stable. Just easy answer.:)
Why u look so serious?:p:
We're are same Thai People......Right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by irev210
are all 4 cores running the same speed with the mult set at 14?
You can check with cpuz 1.5
Thank for ur information I'll try with CPU-Z 1.5 and report it again?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyVirus
Why ur word look so serious?
I'm Just try to play with it and no reason to make a fake result. :)
NO. 04,05,SuperPI 32M,SP04 didn't mean it fake.
and when i've more time I'll test 04,05,SuperPI 32M,SP04 If it not stable on that program I can say it not stable. Just easy answer.:)
Why u look so serious?:p:
We're are same Thai People......Right?
Thank for ur information I'll try with CPU-Z 1.5 and report it again?
555 :p:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by BilLiZe
555 :p:
English Please :banana:
-
those sandra scores are really low for that speed, are you clockgen'ing up?
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by freecableguy
those sandra scores are really low for that speed, are you clockgen'ing up?
Just Look at mem speed...
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by freecableguy
those sandra scores are really low for that speed, are you clockgen'ing up?
i think he only has two cores at full speed... dunno
-
The '06 CPU score isn't low, but thats not saying much ;)
-
1megs are nice and all but lets see some stablity runs... 8 hours of prime.
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmay
1megs are nice and all but lets see some stablity runs... 8 hours of prime.
nobody cares about stability here ,.......maybe another forum
like i said , nice clocks but chech if both die runs at multi 14
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rol-Co
nobody cares about stability here ,.......maybe another forum
like i said , nice clocks but chech if both die runs at multi 14
that's a first one...so all i see here are suicide overclocking?
-
Crazy ... v.nice results ... :) would like to see more results on CPU related scores.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
English please....
It appears that his Q is about why the AQM3 score is v.high when compared to the actual GFX & CPU speed...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Friday~13rd
วู้ !!! ท่าน Crazy... มันแรงจน AquaMark3 อ่านค่า GFX กับค่า CPU ไม่ออกเลยเรอะเนี่ย ???
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rol-Co
nobody cares about stability here ,.......maybe another forum
to right :D
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by slykid
that's a first one...so all i see here are suicide overclocking?
suicide......benchmark.......8houre of prime .......a lot of difference isn't it ?
but i can tell you , most of the screens are just benchmark stable indeed......and nobody cares ....its great. prime suck's and nobody gona do that for 8 houre on phase/dice/ln2.
