G80 to get 12K in 3Dmark 06

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-19-2006, 02:37 PM
rodman

G80 to get 12K in 3Dmark 06

What do you people think? I say the GTX will score pretty damb close to that overclocked.

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=35195

Now if we could only get a good SLI mobo for these cards...
10-19-2006, 02:46 PM
cantankerous

Not quite fast enough to beat an R600 so they say. Wow, I would love to see what the ATI card can do.
10-19-2006, 02:48 PM
mr_knowitall15

:woot: if its true.. I can easily double my graphics performance without going SLI! Hellz yeah. Step-Up program here i most likely come!
10-19-2006, 02:59 PM
Exedy

omg...we are going to see 20k easy soon :D
10-19-2006, 03:03 PM
Scimitar

I wonder what a 5Ghz Kentsfield on a nForce 680 SLI mobo with dual G80's cooled with LN2 will score. 22k?
10-19-2006, 03:08 PM
Dr_BenD_over

I really hope they live up to the hype, I've been putting off upgrading for far to long in eager anticipation.
10-19-2006, 03:19 PM
Exedy

OMG...i just ask myself which game will stop this beasts? I mean...will not exist this game :D

At least when DX10 survive...
10-19-2006, 03:22 PM
kemo

it is hard to say that is the inq no screenies and no information about test bed and what so ever
________
los angeles dispensaries
10-19-2006, 05:30 PM
metro.cl

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scimitar

I wonder what a 5Ghz Kentsfield on a nForce 680 SLI mobo with dual G80's cooled with LN2 will score. 22k?

much more, the rig must have been at stock speeds most probably a X6800 and it seems like 12k is single card (not sure thought).
10-19-2006, 05:51 PM
Gag3

Imho.. I can see a reocurrence with the X1800/7800GTX 512 time.

We have the G80 coming out now.

The R600 @ Christmas(Or more).. that give Nvidia a 2 or more stong months.

In that time, prices can drop.. and they might have something else up there sleave to combat the R600.

8850GX2/8900GTX /or 8950GX2 anyone?
10-19-2006, 05:57 PM
Exedy

probably 8900GTX? :fact:
10-19-2006, 06:04 PM
rodman

8850GX2 in Quad SLI will:slapass: ATI.
10-19-2006, 07:30 PM
BlaqMale

well, if it's a fx62 testbed then that's a decent score, if't a core 2 @ 3.33ghz or something then not so impressive.
10-19-2006, 07:41 PM
rodman

Quote:

well, if it's a fx62 testbed then that's a decent score

Not really as the whole A64 (FX included) line will cause a bit of a bottle neck with a G80, let alone 2 of them. Right now 06 (as well as the FEAR and oblivion engine) is GPU bottlenecked pretty bad, the G80 will allow the conroe to stretch it's wings. Furthurmore I for one do not consider a FX cpu to be much of a gamers cpu anymore so they best not use them on G80 testbeds;)
10-19-2006, 08:17 PM
BlaqMale

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodman

Not really as the whole A64 (FX included) line will cause a bit of a bottle neck with a G80, let alone 2 of them. Right now 06 (as well as the FEAR and oblivion engine) is GPU bottlenecked pretty bad, the G80 will allow the conroe to stretch it's wings. Furthurmore I for one do not consider a FX cpu to be much of a gamers cpu anymore so they best not use them on G80 testbeds;)

i think that's my point. in a cpu limited setup it gets 12k, that's not bad but in a non cpu restrictive setup it gets 12k then that's not so impressive.
10-19-2006, 09:36 PM
rodman

Quote:

i think that's my point.

LOL, I guess it was wasn't it;)
10-20-2006, 03:11 AM
Harshal

Its not clear as to what kind of setup gets you 12K... but I am sure it was Core2 as FX aint da norm since July :)
10-20-2006, 05:19 AM
milkcafe

the score should be like this

Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.15Ghz (350x9)
Geforce 8800GTX 768MB 384bit GDDR3 @ 575MHz/1800MHz

3DMark06 Score 11934 3DMarks

SM 2.0 Score 5562 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 5443 Marks
CPU Score 2727 Marks

a single 8800GTX cant compare with this 7900GTX SLI
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=440284

Intel(R) Xeon(R) Clovertown 2.66GHz + Quadro FX 4500
(2x Intel Woodcrest Xeon 5150 CPU)
3DMark06 CPU score　5581
http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/5765/3dmarkkk6.jpg
10-20-2006, 05:27 AM
Slay0r

That's indeed cool, expecially because for all I know and for all that "news" tells me I can score 12k in 3d06 with a p2 333mhz and 16mb ram, surely :rolleyes:
10-20-2006, 06:05 AM
zakelwe

I'd like to know the SM3.0 part of the score only....

Regards
Andy
10-20-2006, 06:45 AM
ewitte

What ever the CPU its probably stock clocks and the video is also probably not overclocked at all and on beta drivers. This card may make 15k single card pretty easy.
10-20-2006, 07:08 AM
Master_G

I care more about how many watts this thing is chucking out, scores at this point are little more than speculation, reality will probably be good scores with a ridiculous heat output.

G
10-20-2006, 07:09 AM
Gag3

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodman

I for one do not consider a FX cpu to be much of a gamers cpu anymore so they best not use them on G80 testbeds;)

The FX62 is right up there with the X6800 and E6700.. to say that it isn't a gaming CPU is abit of an understatement.
10-20-2006, 07:16 AM
fade2green514

i guess it depends on system configuration - what if theres a physx card? 3dmark06 supports physx doesnt it?
anyways - my X2 3800+ @ 2.6ghz and 7900gtx 512mb scored 6166 in 3dmark06... if they double the amount of power it could put out, and then made it a dual card like the 7950gx2... that would be SO SICK lol

personally i prefer ATI but if a deal comes along then i'll go with the flow.. lol
10-20-2006, 07:41 AM
IvanAndreevich

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gag3

The FX62 is right up there with the X6800 and E6700.. to say that it isn't a gaming CPU is abit of an understatement.

Not really. Especially if we are talking about overclocking.

A "gaming" CPU would be E6400 or E6300 as then you can spend money on what's really important for games - the videocard.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page