http://pic.digital-info.net/Makoto/I...-L/conroeL.jpg
Printable View
Nice, how does it overclock ?Quote:
Originally Posted by sxs112
Regards
Andy
hmm this will be one-core processor? with 1 mb of L2?
I believe so, yes.
That thing will at least pull up to 4 GHz on air with any low end p965 mobo
I like the idea of low bus and high multi
________
Focus WRC
any benches ?
validation ?
Basically a defective Conroe
Conroe-L is Single-Core with 1MB L2 support Enhanced Memory 64 Technology(EM64T)and Execute Disable Bit(XD)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rovtar
non support Virtualization(VT), HyperThreading(HT) and Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology(EIST)
Basically, a really cheap CPU.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
basically, the celly D of core cpus. I bet these suckers will see 4 on air EASY!!! they might make a fun cheapy to run DICE or LN2 on, and annialate super pi.
IMHO, they're a huge step back in technology, just like the Cellys have always been... There is only one single advantage for these chips compared to "genuine" Conroes.. The high multi... For me, everything else speaks against it.. Singlecore, low cache, low FSB-speed, and the fact that they're released half a year after their far supirior bigger brothers... Sure, they might be fun to play with, but for anybody who's serious about the performance of his/her system, they're a no-go... :)
Best Regards :toast:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kemo6600
I agree, i with there would be dual core's like this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTU_XaVier
Why? Out of N# of CPUs manufactured (this goes with anything that is mass produced) you are going to have a percentage that will have defects esp with multi core processors. You really expect them to throw away those CPUs still have a working core? This is the same concept behind Kentsfield, instead of producing native quadcores on a 65nm when 45nm is right around the corner why not glue 2 processors together to save costs? The possiblity for a wafer of 4 core chips to have a defect is greater hence why a smaller process will save money since you are able to harvest more non-defective dies.
This is exactly the problem with the Cell CPU yeilds. It has a huge die size on a 90nm process and any defect has a high probality of rendering a cpu with bad cores or lower clockspeeds.
That would be Allendale.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
These will be nice to see, there are alot of people who want core 2 duo cheaply, but do not need two cores.
This should be a nice option untill the other 200fsb dual core C2D stuff is out.
I'm not saying it's not a good thing, by all means, the less waste, the better :)... I just do not understand peoples' enthusiasm about such an inferior (compared to today's mid-highend hardware) product... And are you going to tell me that office-computers will need the power of 1/4 Conroe?? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous
Best Regards :toast:
Fine, defective Allendales :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by vitaminc
or a super defective conroeQuote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
I prefer the term disabled:)
:rolleyes: says the boy wearing the Neon Pink helmet :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by brentpresley
These are inanimate, mechanical objects... Not people :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by red
I'm pretty sure somebody using the term "defective person" would be kicked head-first out of any kind of forum :D
Best Regards :toast:
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
...
I'd rather have a disabled kid rather than a defective one:p:
But seriously, are not most CPUs disabled down to certain specs, not just chosen because they were made that way:)
This is going to battle it out with Semprons and you call it defective.. :D
Lets think, Semprons have 100% working cores, This probably does but maybe not 100% in 100% of them
:confused:Quote:
This probably does but maybe not 100% in 100% of them