Good 32M time for 3.8GHz Conroe?

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

08-23-2006, 08:14 AM
nachthymnen

Good 32M time for 3.8GHz Conroe?

Hi, anyone can tell me if my time it's good for the cpu freq?
Actually no mods on my ASUS.
How many seconds better with WIN 2k3 server?
Anyone try win xp x64 with Conroe?

TKS

http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/1450/32m1338sl3.jpg
08-23-2006, 08:52 AM
kiwi

And 4Ghz is sub 13 :)
08-23-2006, 09:02 AM
nachthymnen

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiwi

And 4Ghz is sub 13 :)

With aircooling for me it's impossible to close 32M @ 4GHz:(
For now with 1,58V 1M @ 3942MHz.

Another little improvement in 32M:) (last 2 loops sucks:( )
Tomorrow I will try Win 2k3.

http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/6886/32m1335su5.jpg
08-24-2006, 12:22 AM
nachthymnen

Just install WIN XP X64 edition:woot:
Ram 4-4-4-8, I will try again @ 4-4-4-6:)

http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/5...mx64bitug8.jpg
08-24-2006, 12:51 AM
GordonFreemanLP

Hi nathchy, if you want to see my PI 32M i'll comfort you with more and mooore minutes :toast: :banana:
08-24-2006, 01:02 AM
nachthymnen

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonFreemanLP

Hi nathchy, if you want to see my PI 32M i'll comfort you with more and mooore minutes :toast: :banana:

Hi:)
Well, with AMD I remember the "over 23minutes" 32M runs:)
with Conroe 32M it's funny to play:)
08-24-2006, 01:06 AM
GordonFreemanLP

Eheheh, what a lollo procio! asdasdasd

Italian style, italians do it better!
08-24-2006, 01:07 AM
M.Beier

Seems a bit odd with that ramspeed, sendin' ya a PM :)
08-24-2006, 01:16 AM
nachthymnen

Quote:

Originally Posted by M.Beier

Seems a bit odd with that ramspeed, sendin' ya a PM :)

Yes, the better clockers run under 13m @ 3.8ghz:(

A little UP...

http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/3246/32m1322of6.jpg
08-24-2006, 01:49 AM
yotomeczek

Bad Axe :( (not as fast I wish :D)
http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/7410/32mli3.jpg
08-24-2006, 01:52 AM
hicookie

guys,:D
3.8G break in 12Mins is so easy, not my extreme limited yet

why not kington hyper x and p5B-D

http://img.oc.com.tw/8k0285/20068241743269111471620.gif
08-24-2006, 02:00 AM
yotomeczek

Quote:

Originally Posted by hicookie

guys,:D
3.8G break in 12Mins is so easy, not my extreme limited yet

why not kington hyper x and p5B-D

nice like hell :D
I want P5B :D
08-24-2006, 02:01 AM
nachthymnen

Quote:

Originally Posted by hicookie

guys,:D
3.8G break in 12Mins is so easy, not my extreme limited yet

why not kington hyper x and p5B-D

http://img.oc.com.tw/8k0285/20068241743269111471620.gif

This is a good 32M time!!!:slobber:
V-mods on the Mobo?
08-24-2006, 02:03 AM
GordonFreemanLP

I love kingston hyper x... How many volts??
08-24-2006, 02:10 AM
hicookie

Quote:

Originally Posted by GordonFreemanLP

I love kingston hyper x... How many volts??

yup,i have done the vmod
guide here
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=111156

more test with p5b-d and hyper x here
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=112802

ddr2-1140 4434 2.75v 32m
08-24-2006, 02:18 AM
dinos22

wow hicookie that's some sweet RAM you've got there

here's an allendale at 3.8GHz with slower RAM frequency........with ~550+ i should be in the mid-13s

http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/133...7187swmqn3.jpg
08-24-2006, 02:20 AM
hicookie

nice results ,dinos22
super pi 32m speed not different with allendale or conroe
BTW, the kingston hyper x is the real retail , not a cherry pick.^^

dino22> does that memset supprted p5b-D?
08-24-2006, 02:22 AM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by hicookie

nice results ,dinos22
super pi 32m speed not different with allendale or conroe
BTW, the kingston hyper x is the real retail , not a cherry pick.^^

thanks

nah conroe is faster for sure but i think the difference is probably even more evident in 1M times............32M times are closer probably 40seconds or so between the two but it's hard to tell for sure as i still can't convince eva2000 to sell me one of his E6600 Step5 B1 CPUs lol

Quote:

dino22> does that memset supprted p5b-D?

i am still on DS3
08-24-2006, 02:50 AM
M.Beier

Copy-Waza gains more than 3 sec's :)
Try doin' it again.

Also, remember, higher FSB lower multi 1:1 benefits greatly.
The afinity stunt cuts of another 20-40 sec (depends on if its a fresh or old install)
08-24-2006, 03:07 AM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by M.Beier

Copy-Waza gains more than 3 sec's :)
Try doin' it again.

Also, remember, higher FSB lower multi 1:1 benefits greatly.
The afinity stunt cuts of another 20-40 sec (depends on if its a fresh or old install)

what's that
08-24-2006, 03:16 AM
kiwi

Task manager, properties on the process and set affinity. Default has both cores checked, uncheck one of them I guess
08-24-2006, 03:19 AM
M.Beier

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiwi

Task manager, properties on the process and set affinity. Default has both cores checked, uncheck one of them I guess

Yep, core1, since everything runs 0+1, it(windows etc,) uses 0 mostly..
08-24-2006, 04:07 AM
IluvIntel

Hey, why the big deal about running one instance of Super Pi 1.5 on dual core Conroe @ 3.8Ghz. What exactly does this prove ?
One would think 2 instances of Super Pi would be appropriate for dual core...
08-24-2006, 04:21 AM
M.Beier

Quote:

Originally Posted by IluvIntel

Hey, why the big deal about running one instance of Super Pi 1.5 on dual core Conroe @ 3.8Ghz. What exactly does this prove ?
One would think 2 instances of Super Pi would be appropriate for dual core...

Not with shared cache :)
08-24-2006, 05:38 AM
nachthymnen

Another test...
No Copy-Waza but Affinity Core#1, ram 4-4-4-6 and "LargeSystemCache"=dword:00000001

http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/7127/32m3819aa2.jpg:rolleyes:

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page