AMD runs benchmarks in Japan... X2 vs. C2D

AMD's first official test....

My god! Just look at the discrepency of these benchmarks... Atleast the benchmarks done at IDF were consistent with 3rd party reviews.


First test,
X2 4200+ vs. E6300
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba..._amdevent.html

What a load of bullcrap.

Second test,
FX-62 vs. E6700
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba...intelcomp.html


SuperPI 1M with an E6700.... 29secs lol. What a load of bull. Must have ran that E6700 without a hsf and it throttled,
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba...mage/nadi7.JPG,


From what I know, a E6700 runs SuperPI 1M @ stock... like 19 secs? Lol, how do you get 29secs?

Poor AMD, clutching at straws. :(

didn't take time to read it
but in past each manufacturer has had it's share of FUD. So is it really surprising?
oh well!

29 secs is what I was getting on my intel 630 p4.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JNav89GT

didn't take time to read it
but in past each manufacturer has had it's share of FUD. So is it really surprising?
oh well!

---

Yea, but atleast the benchmarks at IDF weren't as bad as this. Actually it was very accurate.

if you look at the pic on the 6700 link

look how the conroe red bars are above the FXs green ones.

the 4200 looks like BS but the other one looks to be inline.

:nono:

I really like to see the test's between the 4200+ and the E6300, from someone in the forum, just to compare.

http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba...mage/name4.jpg

http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba...mage/name6.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clairvoyant129

SuperPI 1M with an E6700.... 29secs lol. What a load of bull. Must have ran that E6700 without a hsf and it throttled,
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba...mage/nadi7.JPG,


From what I know, a E6700 runs SuperPI 1M @ stock... like 19 secs? Lol, how do you get 29secs?

---

the E6600 can do it in 21 sec. those bench are really wrong.

But hey, AMD have nothing more to do than lying to their fanboy. They don't have anything to offer until they release their K8L.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vric

the E6600 can do it in 21 sec. those bench are really wrong.

But hey, AMD have nothing more to do than lying to their fanboy. They don't have anything to offer until they release their K8L.

---

Hehehe! QFT!

The 4200+ vs E6300 tests might be somewhat acurate. Notice they didn't test '01, '03 or SPi where the X2 would get blown away. The X2 can remain at least competitive in '05 and '06 given a clock speed advantage. 2.2Ghz vs 1.86......about an 18% advantage for AMD.

i didn't/couldn't read it, but wow... that must be a wr for the longest time an e6700 does 1m. another wr for intel through amd ha

My E6700 @ stock got 19.0 sec SP1M, their tests are Fn retarded

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v7...l/87e9edad.jpg

AMD market share by Texas Oil :slapass:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Clairvoyant129

AMD's first official test....

---

who cares...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by illidan

who cares...

---

Yes who cares (Bagra bre) :D

Maybe i should post this on the front page of Maxit for a laugh. I'll ask the webmaster. Should be bad publicity for these folks :hrhr:

AMD speed:slobber: :D
Something is rotten in the state of AMDenmark:D :D :nono:
Liar,liar...cccccccc

just like other folks says:
who gives a damn?
amd is gonna be allways no2 in world of cpu constructing and manufacturing...little lies of their market strategy never gonna last long..

Looks like all of the -insert name here- fudware websites just got the green light from AMD.

well it's needed right now

http://img240.imageshack.us/img240/1892/aaaiz8.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by illidan

well it's needed right now

http://img240.imageshack.us/img240/1892/aaaiz8.jpg

---

LOL, a need for fud. :slapass:

LOL :slapass:

well there is no smile for LOL

but i'm laughing out LOUD

never liked AMD, now even more

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brentpresley

This is what you want:

:ROTF:

---

not loud enough :D

LOL. At least it isn't as bad as before. When Netburst was Intel's only option, it was like AMD 86, Intel 7.