Woodcrest 3 Ghz aka Xeon 5160

Here is my dual Woodcrest 3.0 Ghz , 4 GB FBdimm 667Mhz , Supermicro X7DAE mobo




http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/3815/sp1m3oi.jpg



Let me know what benchmarks u wanna see

Ohh man choose somewhere else to host the files....some real ugly woman show up on the left of the pics when you click the links you posted...seems some not so ugly ones also..LOL...still i would look to another hoster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tony

Ohh man choose somewhere else to host the files....some real ugly woman show up on the left of the pics when you click the links you posted...seems some not so ugly ones also..LOL...still i would look to another hoster

---

Any suggestion for a fast pic hoster ? Sorry I am new to this

www.imageshack.us

I like: www.photobucket.com

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SoulGG

www.imageshack.us

---

Thanks bro,

Some more shots on the mobo and CPU

http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/8614/dsc005173sf.jpg

http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/9913/dsc005197vg.jpg

Can you leave them at default size instead of letting it resize them?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wtfdc

Here is my dual Woodcrest 3.0 Ghz , 4 GB FBdimm 667Mhz , Supermicro X7DAE mobo...

Let me know what benchmarks u wanna see

---

I'd like to see PCMark05 myself.

On a slight tangent, I've been heavily considering getting a setup somewhat like that myself and am wondering if you can let me know what motherboards you looked at and why you chose that particular one? I'm still in the looking at my possibilities phase and just wondering what your experiences/suggestions were.

Serra

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serra

I'd like to see PCMark05 myself.

On a slight tangent, I've been heavily considering getting a setup somewhat like that myself and am wondering if you can let me know what motherboards you looked at and why you chose that particular one? I'm still in the looking at my possibilities phase and just wondering what your experiences/suggestions were.

Serra

---

Well, the Supermicro board is Greencreek chipset, it has a PCIe x16 for my Nvidia QuadroFX4400 , 1 PCIe x4 , 3 PCI-X 133Mhz, 1 PCI , 8 FBdimm Slots, Dual Intel Gigabit LOM with IOAT , Dual SCSI/SAS U320 , 2 SATA with Intel Matrix RAID

Overall pretty stable looking workstation

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SoulGG

Can you leave them at default size instead of letting it resize them?

---

Here ya go

http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/6...05179ct.th.jpg

LGA 771
http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/894...05190mf.th.jpg

run some 3D benches, or do u have a good card? if not run a cinebench or a rosetta bench

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cMw

run some 3D benches, or do u have a good card? if not run a cinebench or a rosetta bench

---

Is a Nvidia Quadro FX4400 good enough card ?
Can u send me a link for Rosetta Bench?
Downloading Cinebench now

i want to see what the beats pulls in pcmark 05! and if you had a gaming card some 3d benchies.

Put in a power meter for this workstation :
Idle : 200 watt , Running Cinebench : 210 watts

A far cry from a Netburst based Xeon consuming 350+ watts

Cinebench with 4 cores loaded 100% is 210 watts?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich

Cinebench with 4 cores loaded 100% is 210 watts?

---

Yes , 2 DC Woodcrest 3.0 Ghz , 4 GB FBDIMMs, 1 SATA 120 GB drive and 1 Supermicro mobo

Hi wtfdc,

congrats on this sweer-looking rig. One thing I've been waiting for is some form of comparison between Conroes and Woodcrests for different tasks (encoding, gaming, etc) because I haven't made up my mind yet as to which one i'll buy. I guess I will go with the Woodcrests only if the performance over the Conroe is enough to justify the difference in price (mobo, RAM, etc).

So, is there any way you could bench some of the Conroe benches that have been posted on this forum so we can get an idea of the performance difference between the two?

Thanks in advance.

PCMark 05 :8028

http://img354.imageshack.us/img354/926/pcmark11vo.jpg

Cinebench 9.5 : 14 s



http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/1...nebench1jv.jpg

Temp : 36 - 38 C


http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/7203/temp5cs.jpg

Interesting how the Cinebench performance of the Woodcrest system is identical to that of the Kentsfield...maybe the 266MHz FSB of Kentsfield isn't all the restriction people had feared.

Of maybe Cinebench doesn't stress the bus sufficiently to saturate it.

I'd be very interested to know what a dual Clovertown system pulls in Cinebench...:)

looks Intel wasnt full of it when they said much lower power consumption than AMD for sever task. Then again intel asked amd exactly how they would prefer they benchmark the woodcrest power consumption.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lutjens

I'd be very interested to know what a dual Clovertown system pulls in Cinebench...:)

---

2x Cloverton 2GHz scores 1723 ( 362/core , scaling 4.76x ) while an Opteron 8x854 ( 8x2.8GHz ) pulls 2154 ( 448/core scaling 4.8 ).

Cinebench sucks in scaling past 4 threads.A 16 core Opteron barely gets 2500.

Please run Stream benchmark , it tests sustainable memory bandwidth .

You can download it link for exe or compile it yourself source code

If you know how to compile Fortran source code you can also try Stream 2

Link for site http://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/

You enter command promt and type stream freq and iterations.

first how did u get Xein 5160?? links??

2nd, 3d mark 01 to 06, pc mark ,sis sandra, and some gaems of ur choice :)

thank u :)