Printable View
A nice comparison, good work Coolaler.
His FX-60 PI time is weird though, My Venice @ 2.85GHz is faster.
Ddr2 ??
nice work
:clap:
The Super PI time seems right to me, if you check this thread by OPP where he is testing a FX62. You can see he is getting 25.203s @ 3.25GHz :)
Nice compare Coolaler :up:
So are the 3DMark05 and 06 scores showing that both systems are GPU bound? Is that 7900 GTX SLI or just one card?
I can't understand how Conroe would be faster in 3DMark01 and 03, yet about the same in 05 and 06....
:confused:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durzel
Cause 3dmark 05 and 06 are primarily GPU based tests, 01 is alot of memory speed / timings and CPU overclock. Overclocking a CPU in 05 and 06 doesnt affect the overall score more than a few points.
Fair compare? A $1000 CPU overclocked against a ~$600 CPU at stock speed?
//* AMDboy troll *//
But it wasn't on AM2 with DDR2 memory.. Intel is cheating.. It's unfair... :p:
______
Good job Coolaler.. Can't wait to get mine (23 July is too far...)
Is it under clocked to 2.4 in some of the tests? :confused:
I thought fx-62 would only be am2. fx-60 would be both.
Well Intel finally stepped up to bat with Conroe/Mernom. If its that good @ stock, what happens with the cascade setups and some serious clockage? I haven't bought Intel since my P3-800 that did 1.2ghz but this is gonna be total ownage and I will be switching this winter.
Why is the FSB at 1.2 GHz as opposed to 1066 MHz? And what's up with it being at 2.4 GHz
How overclockable are the conroe chips? Might be good to compare a maxxed out conroe vs a maxxed out FX-62
Hahaha...LMAOQuote:
Originally Posted by wildcard
This is the joke of the day... :slap:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=101190&page=6
dude you missed a few threads :DQuote:
Originally Posted by wildcard
3.7 to 3.9GHz on AIR is it good?.....:)Quote:
Originally Posted by wildcard
i think he was answering this question :Quote:
Originally Posted by Willis
>> "How overclockable are the conroe chips?"
Cause X2 seem to be a bit better at multithreads - and the shared cache is also an issue when it comes to single core versus dualcore percentage performance increase..Quote:
Originally Posted by Durzel
superpi does seem slow
http://forums.extremeoverclocking.co...3&d=1131635799
my 4400+ at 2.94 ghz is low 28s
No I mean 3.7 - 3.9GHz ON AIR as for the Conroe CPU......AMD about 3 - 3.15GHz....;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Willis
Because the FX62 is at 3GHz and the Conroe at 2.67GHz.... 01 and 03 benefit more from the efficient architecture. Conroe needs to be a bit higher before overtaking.......Quote:
Originally Posted by Durzel
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
i saw the 6700 at 3.7 and the 6800 at 3.8 who did the 3.9 ??
slaughter
1. slaugh.ter \'slo.t-*r\ n [ME, of Scand origin; akin to ON sla-tra to
slaughter; akin to OE s]leaht slaughter, sle-an to slay - more at SLAY 1:
the act of killing; specif : the butchering of livestock for mar ket 2:
destruction of human lives in battle : CARNAGE
2. slaughter \-*r-*r\ vt 1: to kill (animals) for food : BUTCHER 2a: to
kill in a bloody or violent manner : SLAY 2b: to kill in large numbers :
MASSACRE - slaugh.ter.er n
rape
NOUN: 1. The crime of forcing another person to submit to silicon acts, especially silicon intercourse. 2. The act of seizing and carrying off by force; abduction. 3. Abusive or improper treatment; violation: a rape of justice.
TRANSITIVE VERB: Inflected forms: raped, rap·ing, rapes
1. To force (another person) to submit to silicon acts, especially silicon intercourse; commit rape on. 2. To seize and carry off by force. 3. To plunder or pillage.
ETYMOLOGY: Middle English, from rapen, to rape, from Old French raper, to abduct, from Latin rapere, to seize. See rep- in Appendix I.
OTHER FORMS: raper —NOUN
AMD will be ahead once 65nm A64 is launched, but... I actually think penryn will hit stores VERY close to AMD 65nm,... And 65nm vs. 45nm, back to the current stage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Willis