since we have new cards about to be released we should have a vantage database also
Printable View
since we have new cards about to be released we should have a vantage database also
Amd Nvidia/Ati -VANTAGE scoreboard
:lsfight:
Top 25
ATI
1 Ben_Brown 3x HD4870 tcf 810/1035 - AMD Phenom II 940 4005Mhz p18,954:bows:
2 topdog HD4870 X2 cfx 800/980 - Amd AMD Phenom II 940 3816 Mhz P17592
3 Lightman 4870 512MB CF @850/1000 -Phenom II 940BE @3815MHz P15172
4 The Weedman 2x3870x2 @ 857/958 - AMD Phenom 9850 2.8ghz P12268
5 kazgirl 2x GeCube 4850 512MB @ 700/1150 - AMD Phenom 9950 @ 3.1GHz P11626
6 merkk1 3x HIS 3850 quadfire @ 715/950 - Amd Phenom 940 @ 3.84 P13065
7 justinl61111 3x Visiontek HD 3870 - stock clocks - Amd Phenom 9850 @ 3.0GHz P9812
8 HondaGuy 2x Sapphire HD 3870@ 860/1297 - AMD Phenom 9850 @ 3.150 P9212
9 Oese 2x 3870 930/1266 - Amd X4 9750 @ 3,2Ghz P9206
10 MoF HD4870 @790/1100MHz -Phenom II 940BE @3815MHz P9029
11 charged3800z24 2x 3870 777/2360 -Amd x4 ? 2.9ghz P8447
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NVIDIA:cheer:
1 aGeoM 9800GT SLI @ 803/1125/2000 *PE* - Amd Phenom X4 9950 3430Mhz P15001 :bows:
2 topdog 2x 8800GTS 512Mb 830/1120/2008 *PE* P14337
3 hata28 8800gts 640 mb 675/1000 *PE*- Amd AMD Phenom 9950 2887 MHz P11880
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
*a little update* as the top 25 gets filled up those at the bottom will get bumped off. No hard feelings but you know what you have to do to get back on it:up: :scope: :smoke:
Ideal post format:
ex...
AMD Phenom 9850 @ 3.2GHz, 3.1GHz, 2.9GHz, 3.0GHz
MSI K9A2 Platinum
4GB (2GBx2) DDR2 @ 1066MHz
2x Sapphire Toxic 512MB @ 875/1297
and a screen shot and link
I say one should post all scores if possible. Thing is, hardly anyone has the res to run X, so it likely cant be that.
I voted Performance though since that is what is 'default'.
Thats some valid points there, I agree, run perf as thats the default setting, it would be nice with all scores from those who can though :)Quote:
Originally Posted by jas420221
that would be a good ideaQuote:
Originally Posted by LIKMARK
I agree, should use all, but Performance is the default and everyone should be able to run that. High and Extreme will be useful though, especially once Performance starts to get system limited like 3D Mark 06.
P9206 - Oese - X4 9750 @ 3,2Ghz - 4x1GB Corsair DHX CL4 @ DDR1066 5-5-4-14 - 2x 3870 930/1266 u. 865/1266 - Cat. 8.7 - Vista 64bit
kazgirl - X4 9850BE @ 2.9Ghz - 2x2GB G.Skill CL5 @ DDR1066 5-5-5-15 2T - 2x 4850 700/1100 - Cat. 8.7 beta dispay driver/ Cat 8.7 regular CCC - Vista 64bit
P11368 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=252260
H7304 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=268217
Unfortunately obly got a 1680 x 1050 20" LCD screen so can't do an X test... and I havn't run the Entry test, don't see the point in it TBH...
Havn't got a SS of the H score at the moment only got a compare url for that, but got a SS of the P score:
AMD Phenom 9850 @ 2.9GHz
ASUS M3A32-MVP Deluxe BIOS v1202
4GB (2GBx2) DDR2 @ 1066MHz
2x GeCube 4850 512MB @ 700/1100
Vista HP 64-bit
http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k2...4850_11368.jpg
What do others think... Entry as well...?????
PS: the High preset was run at 2.8Ghz on the CPU, everything else same.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oese
Yes thats what I thought.... it shows how much less CPU weighted vantage is compared to 3dm06...Quote:
Originally Posted by HondaGuy
More of the overall score is GPU dependent as it should be for a gaming benchmark... IMO..!!
Vantage Score P9212:)
AMD Phenom 9850 @ 3.150
M3A32-MVP Deluxe Bios 1202
4x1gb DDR2 @ 1066MHz volts 2.2
2-- Sapphire HD 3870@ 860/1297
GPU's holding me back
http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/6...tagenewcp0.jpg
http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/6...0ebbd3fa60.jpg
Thats a very nice score, from what I've seen so far 48xx series scales really well with Crossfire, so I think with another 4870 at those clocks, you'd be in the 12-13K+ range for P Score and maybe 9K+ H Score... ???Quote:
Originally Posted by MoF
Hope we see more scores soon...!!!
Hondaguy, you use vista 32bit or 64bit?
Yeah... but I am not gonna buy another HD4870. Single is fast enough :)Quote:
Originally Posted by kazgirl
Oops...sorry.... when I said at the end "I hope we see more scores soon" it wasn't directed at you and the hope that you would get be going x-fire...Quote:
Originally Posted by MoF
It was more in general as there don't seem to be many people posting vantage scores at the moment.....
Just to clarify..!!!!
I guess its because its a Vista only bench...?????
perhaps time for a first list? i think we have about 5 scores already..
Oese:
I use Vista 64 bit, I have done alot of tweaking in the bios
I understood. I just commented that even though I might hit higher scores, I won't be installing another HD4870 (unless someone gives me one for free :rolleyes:)Quote:
Originally Posted by kazgirl
Can't wait for 3- and 4-way HD4 series results, hope someone has some results to share.
motherboard bios? what nb speeds are you running? ht? pcie-clock?Quote:
Originally Posted by HondaGuy
could you give me some hints?
aja, and do you let the tracers run cl4?Quote:
Originally Posted by Oese
I am still refusing to buy Vantage. :) Do you guys actually like it?
@ honda: nice one! especially under vista 64..
when i get my new ballistix, i'll go for some more mhz under vista as well... aha and i see pcie clock 124.. is that a big advantage over 100mhz?
@ particle: i dont like 2dm06 either.. its just a benchmark.. and i like benches ;)
Oese.....Make sure you run your ram UNganged and NOT Ganged
oh i have it ganged.. unganged is better for multithreaded i thought..
AMD X2 6400+ @ 3484Mhz
Asus M2N32 SLI-Deluxe
2X 1GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers
2x 8800GTS 512Mb 835/1130/2008
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=67932
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...opdog/8764.jpg
Hi HondayGuy....Quote:
Originally Posted by HondaGuy
Your running with the TLB fix enabled, did you know...???
The Green button in AOD means its running in "Safe Mode" i.e TLB fix enabled, which is really hindering the CPU performance...
It needs to be RED to be running in Perforamnce mode.... though that said if you can get 3.4Ghz clocks running with the TLB fix enabled, but maybe with Red mode, TLB Fix disabled, you can only get lower clocks then maybe its worth keeping the TLB fix enabled....
But you might get better performance with TLB Disabled and lower clocks, than you are at higher clocks with TLB Fix Enabled.....???? Might be worth looking into at least....!!!
Anyone else have any thoughts on it...???
i thought with b3 there is no bug and so bios and os dont apply the fix, but that theres some performance gain whatever...
ok i tested it.. with button red it is slower in the aod bench then with button green... although the scores are not very reliable.. you have to do it 5-10 times to know the margin..
I have in the BIOS Enabled C1E Support which is the same as the RED mode your talking about
LAt I heard was that even though some BIOS' do differentiate between CPU and enable/disable TLB Fix accordingly, so that when a B3 is installed TLB Fix is disabled in BIOS, Vista enables it...Quote:
Originally Posted by Oese
Not sure if this has changed yet.... I know that whenever I run AOD, by default I have the Red button.... which is supposeldy High Performance mode.
So I'm not sure...maybe one is conflicting with the other...???
PS: Honda Guy ypu posted while I was typing the above...!!!
C1E is related to power saving/cool'n'quiet as far as I'm aware....it has nothing to do with TLB Fix..!!!!
i think if b3 is installed, vista doesnt enable the fix. its only with b2, that if you disable the fix in bios, it will be applied by vista whatever setting..
Wierd cuzz when I enabled the C1E I then get the red ring around the green circle
Here is my Score in Performance when Green
http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/3930/greenaodcs2.png
http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/3...19d5d1d2ca.jpg
Red Ring Now
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/9383/redaodfk0.png
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/938...39467a5730.jpg
mmh perhaps thats the secret behind the red mode? c1e disabled, so the processor doesnt enter halt mode? would make sense and could account for a minimal performance gain..
benched again with c'n'q disabled and now the scores were more constant... red button seems to be minimal ahead ~30 points or so..
thanks for the unganged tip.. i thought it be only for massive multitasking but of course, multithreading has profits as well and most today games are at least using dual-core..
found an increase in vantage also, 3dm not sure.. only one gfx in the system by now and have to do some benches to compare..
Oese:
When Overclocking make sure that you have CnQ Disabled all times, I never have mine enabled.
i know for my higher overclocks its disabled.. i use it in 24/7 3ghz desktop mode to do some savings.. at the benches its also disabled of course..
updated
topdog could you post a link too
nice ;)
Your welcome about the tip Oese...
kazgirl how come your gpu score is lower than the weedmans:shrug:
For the Heck of it..Vantage Entry:)
Had to see if I could beat Weedman
http://img399.imageshack.us/img399/9...ecustomld1.jpg
http://img399.imageshack.us/img399/9...1b66aa1ced.jpg
Just looked at the compare now...Quote:
Originally Posted by msimax
UUmmm.... I think its because he has 4 GPU's - 2 x 3870X2's over my 2 GPU's - 2 x 4850's..!!!!
But hey for the price he paid for his 2 x 3870X2's compared to the price I paid for my 2 x 4850's I think I win that round....LOL...:yepp: He deserves the extra 900 or so points for the extra $$$/£££'s he's paid...!!!!
Actually i paid $450 total for both x2's with ek fcb's ;) but my 4850 cost more then what i sold 1 x2 for :down:Quote:
Originally Posted by kazgirl
Oh....OK..... nice price you got for them then.... putting it another way then.... 3870X2 was the top range card at its time, whereas the 4850 is a mid-range in comparison..... 3870X2 has twice as many GPU's and yet the the difference between the mid-range 4850 single GPU (or dual GPU in X-fire) and the 3870X2 with Quad GPU in X-fire is not that great...!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by The Weedman
The 4850 is by far the superior card IMO.... though of course if prices for the 3870X2's come down enough now that 4-series is avaialable then clearly the 3870X2's in X-fire may be the way to go.... but I'm hoping at some point to add a 4870X2 to my 4850's...the main problem I have is the slot arrangement on the M3A32-MVP doesn't really allow me to run 2 dual slot cards in Crossfire without having to remove my TV Card from the PCI-E slot, or having to remove other devices that are occupying expansion slots... I have a VGA PSU that uses one, and I have a bracket for feeding the water-cooling pipes through in another.... I also have a switch for the CCLK in one, though that could be removed actually...I never really use it anyway..!!!!
I'd like to go for 4870X2/4870X2 in Crossfire, but I just havn't got the space for them at the moment....that's why I opted for the single slot 4850's well that and the cost....:)
There is a typo in the second post. I guess it is 3dmark Vantage scoreboard and not 3dmark06 :)
:am::slapass:
compare link added to post no 27Quote:
Originally Posted by msimax
Same here Oese, for everyday use I set it 3.150 as seem in pic
http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/7206/247qa9.png
http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/7...1c2d1f0a67.jpg
jep unfortunately my nb isnt stable with higher clocks at the default x9 multiplier.. so anything above 3ghz is not possible with c'n'q on my 9750.. the black edition is much better there..
P8447
It was run with 2.9ghz x4 Phenom 9850, 777core, 2360mem 2x 3870's
Sorry... I left out that it was a 9850..I am having trouble running 3.1ghz now. When ever I kick up a intense app, my system falls on its butt. My fans spin down like 500rpm. I have it at 2.953ghz x4 using 13.5 multi and 219FSB. My NB is almost 2400mhz still.. I think my PSu is going out, or my board is dropping fets..
Hello Guys!
What game are you playing today? :p:
Here is my first run of mildly OCed HD4870 the day I got the card.
P8440
Done at everyday settings:
CPU 2711
MEM 912MHz 4-4-4-12-15
HD4870 512MB 790/1000
Now I have some spare time so I'm going to tweak my RIG! New memory, new BIOS for card, new BIOS for board....Quote:
3DMark Score P8440 3DMarks
CPU Score 8888
Graphics Score 8300
Test Results
Graphics Tests
Jane Nash 23.51 FPS
New Calico 25.15 FPS
CPU Tests
AI Test 1124.72 Operations/s
Physics Test 14.42 Operations/s
Feature Tests
Texture Fill Test 820.79 GTexels/s
Color Fill Test 5.75 GPixels/s
Pixel Shader 22.69 FPS
Stream Out 17.39 FPS
GPU Particles 35.4 FPS
Perlin Noise 61.29 FPS
I hope to gain another 100-200 points. For more I've installed 32bit Windows but it's not yet configured - no time for that this week :(
UPDATE:
P8874
CPU 2685MHzQuote:
Main test results
3DMark Score P8874 3DMarks
CPU Score 8981
Graphics Score 8839
Test Results
Graphics Tests
Jane Nash 25.17 FPS
New Calico 26.64 FPS
CPU Tests
AI Test 1153.64 Operations/s
Physics Test 14.14 Operations/s
MEM 1146MHz 5-5-5-15-24
HD4870 512MB 830/1050
:rolleyes:
Hi guys.
System used:
Phenom X4 9500 @ 2.83G HT/NB @2060M
ASUS Crosshair II bios 0607
4x1GB OCZ 2N1066SR2GK @ DDR1030 5-5-5-18 2T Unganged
9600GT SLI @ 800/1100/2000
Windows Vista x64 no SP1
nForce 780a Driver 18.11
Forceware Driver 177.79
See SS for voltage details.
Score P9266
http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/6...09600gtvq5.jpg
:toast:
New run, slightly lower clocks than before but better score:
P8969
Phenom 9950 @3,2GHz, HD4870 @790/1100MHz
So a nice 300 point performance increase over the last run with the same clocks (P8635). I don't have time to flash the Asus 4870 TOP BIOS on my graphics card so I won't make a 825/1100 run yet. Maybe tomorrow. I guess it is safe to say that I would get past P9000 at 825/1100 :D
Hi guys.
New update, PhysX Enabled.
System used:
Phenom X4 9500 @ 2.85G HT/NB @2076M
ASUS Crosshair II bios 0607
4x1GB OCZ 2N1066SR2GK @ DDR1038 5-5-5-15 2T Unganged
9600GT SLI @ 800/1100/2000
Windows Vista x64 no SP1
nForce 780a Driver 18.11
Forceware Driver 177.79
PhysX Driver 8.07.18
See SS for voltage details.
Score P11321
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/493...09600gtrl4.jpg
:toast:
aGeoM
im torn between updating your score and putting a asterisk like barry bonds or not with all this physics hoopla going on
It's up to you, nVidia PhysX it's a reality from today on, if the hardware/software take advantage of that tech, why not?Quote:
Originally Posted by msimax
msimax
Thank you for updating the score with the Physics Enable note, was a good decision.
Some new update to my score, OCed a little more the GPUs, and tweaked the memory timings.
System used:
Phenom X4 9500 @ 2.85G HT/NB @2076M
ASUS Crosshair II bios 0607
4x1GB OCZ 2N1066SR2GK @ DDR1038 5-5-4-12 2T Unganged
9600GT SLI @ 825/1125/2100
Windows Vista x64 no SP1
nForce 780a Driver 18.11
Forceware Driver 177.79
PhysX Driver 8.07.18
See SS for voltage details.
Score P11704
http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/3...09600gthp1.jpg
UPDATE
Just tried with physX installed and what an improvement :shocked:
AMD X2 6400+ @ 3462Mhz
Asus M2N32 SLI-Deluxe
2X 1GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers 1066
2x 8800GTS 512Mb 830/1120/2008
SCORE P14337
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=293126
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...dog/P14337.jpg
Here is a run with only one HD 4850, I will post one with 2 later.
P7355
AMD Phenom 9850 3.1ghz
HD 4850 stock
Gigabyte
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=311186
http://3800z24.info/Phenom/3.1htt/3....50_vantage.jpg
Latest Score with new Cat 8.8 beta drivers v.8.54 - Small increase from previous scores
AMD Phenom 9850BE @ 2900Mhz
Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe BIOS v1203
2 x 2GB G.Skill DDR2-1066
2 x GeCube 4850 512MB @ 700/1100
P11439 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=336178
*updated* keep em coming
System used:
Phenom X4 9950 @ 3.4G HT@2000 NB @2400M
ASUS Crosshair II bios 0502
4x1GB OCZ 2N1066SR2GK @ DDR1030 5-5-5-18 2T Unganged
8600GT SLI @ 780/950/1836
Windows Vista x86 SP1
nForce 780a Driver 18.11
Forceware Driver 177.92
PhysX Driver 8.07.18 Enabled
Score P4833
http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/5...0be8md8.th.jpg
:rofl:
P9812 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=172422
Phenom 9850 @ 3.0GHz
Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
3 - Visiontek HD 3870 - stock clocks
*updated* :D
do you have a link??Quote:
Originally Posted by hata28
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=333362Quote:
Originally Posted by msimax
BTW I just upgraded to 9950 but the benchmark not much of difference
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=361009
@hata28..
Can you add the PhysX card to your sig so people can tell that you have it enabled for the benchmarks....
Threw me initially until I checked ORB compare...
Its a really nice boost that PhysX gives isn't it....
I don't know if you count it i ran the trial vantage for the fun of it
Yeah....seem that my old G80 8800 GTS performed not bad at all!!Quote:
Originally Posted by kazgirl
btw ..you have to pump your Vcore that high to OC over 3 Ghz.....Hmmm...mine is 140W and need around 1.4V for 3Ghz. If OC to 2.8Ghz I can use default Vcore which is 1.29V.
Only a slight update, but past 9k
P9029
Phenom 9950 @3.2GHz, HD4870 @790/1100MHz
updated-:up:
merkk1 can you post your system specs
Whats the difference? Is this sort of like new AMD Dual channel or what is the ganged thing exactly?Quote:
Originally Posted by HondaGuy
up-date almost got into the 10,000 point range . If i get 10,000 with my 3850s i be happy
:clap:BAM!!! 10,001 point score in vantage using 3850 video cards WOOT!
MsiMax
Sorry dude didn't see you wanted my sepc. till i was rereading the thread.
AMD 9850 (3.003 ghz. 24/7) testing 3.118 ghz. for new 24/7 clock , max over clock 3.2 ghz.
Rosewill RCX-Z940-LX cpu cooler
Foxconn a79a-s mother board
A-DATA DDR2-800 5-5-5-18-24 clock at 231 (FBS) for 3.003 ghz.
3 HIS 3850 (256) video cards running in crossfire X
2 WD 80 gig SATA-2 hard drives using SB750 on board raid-0
using onboard Realtek sound card
Rosewill R5601-BK case
PC POWER & COOLING 750w silencer crossfire edition
19" HANNS-G LCD
*updated* keep em coming
thanks merkk1
Up-date 3.199 ghz. 4 3850 @710/904 8.9 drivers
I just tried to run Vantage and got the following score. The last time I tried it, it would not run so now I guess I will purchase it and try to top it.
Let me know if you have trouble seeing it since it is a trial version.
http://service.futuremark.com/home.a...&resultType=19
This is all on my sig rig.
Congrats
Very ...very nice score....!!!
I'm still waiting on delivery for my M3A79-T, but hopefully will be able to get 12K+ as well, once it arrives, and hopefully can get my 9850BE over 3.0Ghz
If only I had the cash to get a 3rd 4850...!!!
Well in time maybe.. maybe even a 4850X2.... depending on pricing..
System used:
Phenom X4 9950 @ 3430 HT/NB @2542
ASUS Crosshair II bios 0701
2x1GB OCZ 2N1066SR2GK @ DDR1016 5-5-4-12 2T Unganged
9800GT SLI @ 803/1125/2000
Windows 7 x86
nForce 780a Driver 18.11
Forceware Driver 178.15
PhysX Driver 8.09.04
Score P15001
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=431070
http://img76.imageshack.us/img76/419...gefowo5.th.jpghttp://img76.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
Quick Update, new CPU:
AMD Phenom 125W 9950BE @ 3.1GHz, 1.45v (JAAAB AA 0833 CPBW)
ASUS M3A32-MVP Deluxe BIOS v1203
4GB (2GBx2) DDR2 @ 1066MHz
2x GeCube 4850 512MB @ 700/1150
Vista HP 64-bit
3DMark Score - P11626
CPU Score - 10074
Graphics Score - 12255
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=438652
*updated*
9950 JAAAB AA 0831CPEW@3.3GHz
2x 2GB GEIL 1066MHz
HD4870X2@850/900
VistaUltimate x64
P13314
CPU Score 10763
GPU Score 14456
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=449959
am i really 1st on amd/ati scoreboard??????
edit: wtf is wrong with aGeoM“s cpu score??? physx on nvidia gpu?
Your GPU helps a lot :)Quote:
Originally Posted by MadDias
Yes, PhysX enabled.Quote:
edit: wtf is wrong with aGeoM“s cpu score??? physx on nvidia gpu?
Hi guys!
My new entry:
P9388
GPU Score: 9263
CPU Score: 9783
And all thanks to my new Phenom 9950BE 0831CPMW :rocker:
Low clocks so far for Vista x64. I need to find my max. clock yet.
In Win MCE x32 it can do 3.4GHz 1.45V so I hope 3.2 in Vista will be possible :)
Hi
I just got my second 4870X2, and it works real well.
P1595
Gpu 18848
Cpu 10651
Vista 64
M3A79-T (200)
9950 (140w) (16.5) (3.3)
1066 ram
xFire 4870X2 (800-900)
sweet a phenom finally with two 4870x2's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyben
I just ordered that board too.
all you need now to get up a little higher is two agiea physics cards.
would have to be on water though to fit it in lol
demonkey666, are you saying that if I put in my Agiea card, things will be better?
Just got an X11439
Gpu 11485
Heres mine:
P12756 3DMarks
CPU Score 10534
Graphics Score 13721
DFI 790FX-M2RSH
Phenom 9950 3.350Ghz
CF HD4870@800/925
8GB DDR1083
Vista X64
Is the lower the number the better in CPU score? Never used this benchmark so some kick info would be great
it should be because Vantage uses physics cards.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyben
I got 8885 with two 3870's and 1 Ageia card. was looking at benches and UI scored the exact same as a Q6600 with an physic card and that cpu was at 3.0ghz, lol
I'm sure results will vary though.
Thanks, I'll try it.
P8187 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=234539
HD4870 stock - Phenom 9850 BE stock
Well I added my 4th 3870 and completed a run. Results below. Can't wait until my new PSU comes in so I can push the CPU higher and pencil mod all four 3870s for some good benching action.
13,233 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=478677
CPU @ 3415MHz - 4x 3870 @ 864/1272
EDIT: I messed with ACC and got a higher score than previously submitted.
UPDATE:
13,801 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=484052
CPU @ 3417MHz - 4x 3870 @ 885/1202
try using two lets see what happensQuote:
Originally Posted by Cyben
M3A79-T has only one PCI slot available.
I wonder if the Aegia card slows down the CPU?
Also the total GPUs would come to 5. (two 4870X2s); could this be a problem?
I will need to change the cooling for the Aegis card, being that it is up against the ATI card.