Get them while they got them. I got me two kits already.
LINK
Printable View
Get them while they got them. I got me two kits already.
LINK
tempting... but i already have 13GB's of ram... ugg
thx for the heads up tho, seriously thinking about it. I only have 3GB of fatbody... 6GB of fatbody wouldnt hurt much.
I am guessing since CORSAIR isnt having a lot of RMA's on the micron stix that they are releasing inventory held for RMA.
:eek: Gimme some... :stick:
30 left... Man not sure if I should go for them or not :(
does it overclock as well with 4x512mb?
If these are as good if not better than the 8000 UL counterpart, then the answer is YES. Because I can do 1000Mhz 4-3-2-4 @ 2.45vdimm with my 8000ULs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxis1452
these are better then the 8000UL... if these are version 1.2 that is.
if they are version 1.5, then they are the same as the 8000UL.
my 5400UL V1.2 can do 1.08 ghz cas 4-3-2-1 at 2.45 volts.
a note for anyone interested.
I've had 4 sets of these rams, 2 sets of the 8000UL, 2 sets of the 5400UL, they all stop responding to voltages at about 2.65 volts.
these arent ram that will just get better and better if you put 2.8 volts into them or something.
for daily use though, they are great if you can live with 2.4 volts.
Don't the 8000UL's generally scale better at 4-3-3-x? I too had 1080 at about 2.5v on 5400UL's, but 4-3-3-x got them nothing, and 1100 seemed to be impossible, no matter how loose timings got or how high voltage went. :shrug: IIRC, the 8000's should get closer to 1150, but only at 4-3-3 or higher, and usually don't scale well at 4-3-2-x.
Might be worth noting, IMHO, rev 1.3 and 1.5 of 5400UL's are far less than spectular...GMH should be able to beat those revs easy. Cross your fingers for 1.2's on these.
for the 8000UL, its definatly easier to OC them with cas 433 then it is with cas 432. they do 432 just fine, but dont remain completly stable. the 5400UL v1.2 does fine at 432 regaurdless of the speed.
mine top out at about 1140 mhz.
of all the UL I've had, I only kept my 5400UL V1.2.
the 8000UL's are great, but if you can get 5400UL V1.2 then they are better.
I only need 1 set of 2x512 ram, so I sold mine to my friends.
I doubt newegg would have this many V1.2's at this point....
Most likely V1.3 or 1.5.......but if they are V1.2's buy them all...:D
Most likely will be v1.5. The single stick of 5400UL I got 2 weeks ago with the 8000UL is v1.5.
Pic shows rev 1.2 and 3-2-2-8 (as opposed to 3-3-2-8) spec. If you don't get as such, it'd at least be worth complaining to newegg about.
They really should be listing the spec in the ad, especially since it varies revision to revision.
where do you see how many are left in stock?
just add 99 to your cart and update...it will go down to how ever many they have left. looks like 27 left still right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxis1452
Hmmm, looks like we should wait until nicepun gets his and confirms they a version 1.2
This would work great for my upcoming conroe build even if it was 1.5 With an E6400 and hopefully the RD600... 4x512?
Actually mentioning the RD600 Gary Key of anandtech said that they are finalizing the bios and then Anandtech would finally be able to preview the board heh.
Specs per newegg:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
Model
Brand CORSAIR
Series XMS2
Model TWIN2X1024A-5400UL
Type 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM
Tech Spec
Capacity 1GB (2 x 512MB)
Speed DDR2 675 (PC2 5400)
Cas Latency 3
Timing 3-2-2-8
Voltage 2.1V
Heat Spreader Yes
I've noticed that sometimes when I follow the OP link to Newegg's product page, the Specification tab is also displayed, and other times only
Those 3-2-2-8 timings caught my eye, because if you look at just about any of the D9 fatbody listings, they all show the v1.2 to have the second set of timings you posted above (the 3-3-2-8).
Per this linked review (below), the versions earlier than v1.2 (v1.1?) were rated for 3-2-2-8 timings, whereas v1.2 and later received the more relaxed 3-3-2-8 ratings. In that case, newegg's Specs of 3-2-2-8 would infer that the product is v1.1, whereas the pic is for v1.2.
Quote from review:
According to Corsair, TWIN2X1024A-5400UL modules are one of the best DDR2 SDRAM offerings from the company. This memory is tested for operability at 675MHz frequency and with 3-3-2-8 latencies. Note that these characteristics apply only to version 1.2 TWIN2X1024A-5400UL kits (the version number is indicated on the module’s sticker). For earlier versions of its DIMM kits the manufacturer guaranteed more aggressive timings (3-2-2-8), but later they decided to worsen the characteristics a little to reduce the manufacturing cost.
Link to source of quote:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/mem...-oc1ghz_2.html
As always...it will be interesting to see what actually ships (reminds me of when everyone was buying TwinMOS SP, by looking at the pics, and hoping for Winbond UTT. :) ).
Edit:
Added newegg's Specs for the product
by the time you guys start finding out what revision is there...
they probably wont be there any more...
1st person @ XS to receive 5400UL's from the EGG check V1.x on them and
pls. let us know what they are pls.......;)
I should get them nex Wednesday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynasty
It's a gamble but they are not selling as fast. The average Joe doesn't not know about the performance you get from these.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunaak
I'll be getting mine wednesday, but I also got a single stick of 5400UL when the 8000UL were in stock 2 weeks ago (I think they only had one single stick in stock) and it's v1.5. They took the page down for the single 512mb stick, so I can't be certain whether the specs on the Newegg page said 3-3-2-8 or 3-2-2-8.
What kind of results did you get from the v1.5 and does anyone know what chips it uses, if not D9s?
As a sidenote, I always print out the product page and the Specs of all parts that I purchase, whether from newegg or any other retailer, or for that matter, any item off the Classifieds (Sellers description of the item). It sometimes comes in handy.
They're def. fatty d9. I haven't had the chance to give that stick a run. I have off tomorrow, so I'll see then.
Agree, I need good 2x512:p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynasty
Review isn't correct. I've personally had every version from 1.1 to 1.5 in hand...1.2 is definitely 3-2-2-8. 1.3 is 3-2-2-8 for single sticks, 3-3-2-8 matched pair. From then on, they're all 3-3-2-8. The review seems to use ES sticks, so maybe even Corsair themselves hadn't finalized the spec by the time the review was printed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Reefa_Madness
They all use D9DQT or D9DQW, but the newer revisions are markedly inferior, presumably because at that point the 8000UL's were getting the higher bin.
Thanks for that post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
I would certainly put more stock in your first hand experience than in that review so for future reference I'm going to bookmark your post...you are now officially a reference source.
Your theory on why the newer revisions of the 5400ULs were inferior makes sense and if I was producing the two models I would be binning accordingly. They were probably binned the same way TCCD was...some chips were better suited for running DDR400 at 2-2-2-5 and some were better suited for running DDR600, but at more relaxed timings. The later 5400s were probably selected because they could run the tighter timings at the lower clocks and the 8000ULs could do the higher clocks, but with more relaxed timings.
one thing that should be noted...
Even the slower versions of the 5400UL and 8000UL are still far better then pretty much any 2 x 512 stick set out there.
its not often you will find any ram capable of cas 4-3-3-8 at 1 ghz, no matter what ram you try.
just for Corsair UL, some are alittle better then others, but all are still damn good sets of ram.
"Even the slower versions of the 5400UL and 8000UL are still far better then pretty much any 2 x 512 stick set out there.
its not often you will find any ram capable of cas 4-3-3-8 at 1 ghz, no matter what ram you try."
Kunaak,
I'm glad to see you post that...of course, that'll probably eliminate any chance of my getting another set next week. :D
20 Kits of left as of right now.
well I'm in for two.
OK, I'm in for 2!
Now I need a mobo & processor that will take the best advantage of this ram. I plan on getting either the 6400 or 6600.
Which board with what processor will make these sticks shine???
-I don't need CF or SLI.
this are nice rams.. :D
4 more sets sold here!Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunaak
12 left.
not all 1.2 kits are that great....i remember a couple of users at OCAU with some sorry ass results
Dammit, I won't get mine until next Monday, I guess Thanksgiving is messing things up.
Why is that? If it ships today, 3 days in Wednesday or Friday.Quote:
Originally Posted by nicepun
Yeah, mine show tracking with an estimated deliver date of the 27th. :(
This is very strange indeed. Hopefully they readjust and they get here on Wednesday or even Friday.
Must be due to east coast. I was hoping for you to get yours before I ordered. I already grabbed the 8000UL it to 2.55v to hit the 4-3-2-4 @ 500MHz though. Guess I'll have to bite the bullet.
you forgot to mask the tracking # in the url :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by nicepun
(not that anyone can do anything with it)
Thanks. :slap:Quote:
Originally Posted by Diverge
I hope this is really v1.2
I just ordered 2 sets/ 10 left
None thus far. Except of course that you have all your dimms filled.Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
:shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunaak
Is there any reason you would want 2 x 512 over 2 x 1gb or 4 x 512?
Are some benchmarks better for 2 x 512 rather than 2x1gb?
nope, I just dont need a ton of ram, my 5400UL is my bench ram.Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
for daily use, I have other sets of ram.
I thought smaller modules overclocked better.Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
10 sets left.
the memory will be in for me today :) I will have minimal time to OC, but I will give you guys soem info when it gets in.. should be here in like 3 hours or so :D
SAD
Great!!! I just want to know if they say v1.1 then I'll order a couple.:DQuote:
Originally Posted by SuAsDu
Ok.. the box was sitting up front. No one told me it was here :P
Anyway.. its not 1.1. I got v1.5. But the timing is still rated at 3-3-2-8 @ 675.. so we will see how it goes.
SAD
Let us know how they go, only 9 sets left and I don't know if I should get them :(
Hmmm. I guess I sit this one out. I picked up the 8000UL last time and I'm pleased with there results. I doubt thes v1.5's have D9DQT or D9DQW that's superior to them.
Man, I was convinced that NewEgg had v1.2. Please post some results with the v1.5.Quote:
Originally Posted by SuAsDu
8 sets left.
If I send mine back for a refund and demand they pay return shipping (because the specs. are different), it costs NewEgg money.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
Does anybody think NewEgg would drop the price by complaining about this issue?
We might be able to get some money back if we all complained (together).
hahaha....
are you serious?
you wanna send it back, cause you didnt get a specific revision?
find any other set of ram that will do what even the 1.5's will do, then see if you want to sent it back.
your not gonna find ram that possibly will do cas 4-3-2 at 1 ghz anywhere these days.... or even cas 4-3-3...
cause Ras to Cas 3 at 1 ghz, is extremely hard on ram.
just try the ram, before you go flippin out about some revision numbers...
I will try to bench them tonight on my p5b. I'm having a heck of a time w/ the leaving curve on the 680i :P
SAD
If I get RAM which Corsair says is rated at 3-3-2-8 and not the 3-2-2-8 RAM I ordered from NewEgg, I am serious about playing some hardball. I could write a lawsuit on that discrepancy very easily.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunaak
I did not say I wanted to send it back, I said it would cost NewEgg money if I did (on the basis of shipping and handling). NewEgg might also have to resell it as an "open box" item at a further loss (although I have not seen any high quality "open box" RAM there).Quote:
find any other set of ram that will do what even the 1.5's will do, then see if you want to sent it back.
your not gonna find ram that possibly will do cas 4-3-2 at 1 ghz anywhere these days.... or even cas 4-3-3...
cause Ras to Cas 3 at 1 ghz, is extremely hard on ram.
just try the ram, before you go flippin out about some revision numbers...
I am glad you think that even v1.5 is so good. I do plan to test it, however my BadAxe can only overvolt the DIMMs to 2.2V (I was planning to order BadAxe2's to go with this RAM).
Man, talk about jumping the gun. Just try it. Take the heatspreaders off and tell us what's under the hood. I'm dying to know. post your results in this thread. please
I am most curious. How do you find out exactly how many they have in stock?
I think this was mentioned in an earlier thread. Something about adding a high number (say, 100? 1000?) to your cart, which makes it reduce the number in your cart to the number in stock.
I think.
Type in 99 in the quantity and it will tell you that there is insuficient quantity and instead will show the available quantity, which about an hour ago, or so, was only 7 sets.
thats funny... you actually think that would work...Quote:
Originally Posted by bofors
no where on the page, where you buy the ram do they garauntee any specific revision.
what you get, is Corsair 5400UL.... nothing more.
Not even the Cas is Garaunteed.
you can write all the law papers you can think of, but when you buy something, you get only what you buy, not specific revisions.... just like if you buy a CPU and you get a week or code you dont like, it's not thier fault.
its in clear plain words here.
http://www.newegg.com/CustomerServic...yAgreement.asp
No website on the internet can be expected to tailor to specific revisions of any hardware. a few will try, like Tankguys definatly go out of thier way to get a person exactly what they want, but a place like newegg, wont, and it's clearly typed out in thier User Agreement Policy.
Quote:
Product Revisions
Newegg.com is not responsible for changes or variations in product specifications and/or physical appearance. In the interest of our customers, Newegg.com puts forth its best efforts to ensure that all product information is up-to-date and factual. Unfortunately there are varying determinates which, although infrequent, could cause the information on our website to become outdated without our immediate knowledge. This includes but is not limited to new versions or revisions, color deviations, retail package alterations and other variations that may be considered inconsequential by the manufacturer. Newegg.com relies on the manufacturer to communicate these differences. Presently we have no way of alerting customers prior to purchase in the event the manufacturer fails to do so. Consequently, Newegg.com will not be held responsible for product revision changes.
Who honestly goes off on newegg's revision numbers...
Besides, why do you care, your only going to run cas 4-4-4 @ 2.2v anyway. Do you honestly think you will even see any difference @ 2.2v...um..no.
The last pair of 8000UL from newegg was DOA, sent both pairs back for a full refund, and if anything Newegg's RMA policy is kick-ass! You go try some of that crap with e-wiz or some other online retailer...
It's unfortunate the sticks were not v1.2. Since that was a big deal to me I didn't order. I waited for someone to confirm what they got before making a decision. Even though I'm now shying away from them, until they are tested to see how they perform or someone removes the heat spreaders and reveals they have D9DQT or D9DQW, everything is still premature. Newegg is definitely not responsible for us not receiving exactly what we see in the photo's as someone has already posted. Come on thats just ridiculous:slapass: Everyone RMA's for whatever reason. Some of us find it unethical, but it's the consumer's right to request a refund if not satisfied with a purchase. This is why companies have return policies to protect their interest and thwart funny stuff as much as possible. Hopefully the sticks Will perform admirably & most will be satisfied with their purchase. I'm certainly and happy with the 8000UL purchase I made, but very disappointed in the 2GB Kit Crucial 25th Anniversary purchase. Win some, lose some:rolleyes:
Perhaps the law works differently in Alaska, but where I live it is not legal to make commercial representations (advertisements) which are false or which should have been known to be false.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunaak
It is NewEgg's fault. They should have known the "5400UL" they had was not rated at 3-2-2-8 by Corsair. The spec. is clearly labeled on the RAM, all NewEgg had to do was update their page. Since NewEgg seems to have updated their data from v1.0 to v1.2, it is fair to suspect that NewEgg deliberately failed to change it for revisions v1.3, v1.4 and v1.5 (all of which are lower spec.).Quote:
just like if you buy a CPU and you get a week or code you dont like, it's not thier fault.
Moreover, v1.2 and v1.5 use significantly different grades of RAM. Representing v1.5 as being the same thing as v1.2 (i.e. "5400UL"), when NewEgg (and Corsair) knew or should have known v1.5 is of substantially lesser quality than v1.2 is fraud.
NewEgg's statement might provide a weak defense on the contract claim (NewEgg's obligation to ship me what I ordered, i.e. 3-2-2-8 RAM), but it has no bearing on the claims of negligence (NewEgg's duty to post the corrects specs.) or fraud (NewEgg's tacit agreement with Corsair to lower the quality of IC's on parts after they have generated rave reviews).Quote:
its in clear plain words here.
In short, it does not matter what NewEgg's "policy" says. It is illegal to make false advertisements and to dupe people with Corsair's "bait and switch" overclocking RAM schemes.
Kunaak, you seem like a nice guy and I value reading your posts in this forum. In fact, they were a deciding factor in my decision to order the RAM in question. But I do not think you have clue about the law and I have not even bothered to spell out what should be obvious in this case.Quote:
thats funny... you actually think that would work...
Now, I have just laid down some $520 for RAM that NewEgg claimed to be rated 3-2-2-8 by Corsair and apparently is not. To make a very simple analogy that really fails to cover the fraud aspect of the overclocking RAM business, this is like ordering a pizza with anchovies and having the delivery guy show up with pepperoni instead. Even if that is the best pepperoni in the world, dammit if I am not going to get a discount on that pizza.
Cheers,
~bofors
no....
what the problem here is... is you, youuuuuuu believe that heres this huge massive difference between the 1.2 and 1.5, you think ras to cas 2 is some major advantage that your losing out on....
aren't you aiming for cas 4-3-2 or cas 4-3-3 at over 1 ghz like most people?
so why are you freaking out?
and neweggs policy is clear, its simple, and every single time you buy something... you agree to to that policy, it's right before you check out and you click that little button saying "I agree".
you may not read it, but it's there, implying that you should have known this before you ever bought something...
I believe that if you put up a big enough stink, newegg might not charge a restocking fee and refund your full purchase price fee due to the error in the Specifications regarding the memory timings.
I would be more than surprised, however, if anyone could get a discount on their purchase and be able to keep the ram. If it is good enough to keep, then pay the asking price, otherwise send it back for a refund.
Kunaak's point is worth repeating, however...if you plan on running 4-3-3 at over a DDR1000, does it really matter whether the ram is rated (or for that matter, actually runs) 3-2-2-8 or 3-3-2-8?
I understand that most of us would prefer the v1.2, as it has been proven, on average, to perform the best of the lot. I certainly hope that I receive v1.2, however unlikely that may be, but in the end, these are 5400ULs and probably still a great buy for $130. As has been posted before, even some v1.2s have been duds, so what is better, a poor set of "genuine v1.2" or a good set of v1.5?
Until these sticks are tested we're just speculating over nothing.
Yeah everyone stop until we see some results. Its really annoying.
Hey folks.. I didn't have time to bench the ram last night. I had the 680i on the table, but figure to give the ram the full test i need to put it on my p5b.
So right now I got the p5b on the bench and loading a fresh Windows install.
Hopefully I will have some results in the next few hours.
What type of stability do you guys want to see for the initial runs? And don't be telling me 480hours of Orthos. Tommorrow is turkey day and then black friday.. so I will provide any initial results that can be obtained in a couple of hours.
For now my goal is 1mb and 32mb spi for initial. Anything differnet, let me know.
SAD
Sounds good SAD :) Just want to see max speed 4-3-2-1 you can get through single 32m and 3dmark.
AFI - you want to see my max speed with the timing at 4-3-2-1? Or is that differnet at CAS 4,3,2,1?Quote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
sAD
SuAsDU,
Do you have a Memtestv1.65 bootable cd? If so, set your memory to 4-3-2-X DDR2-1000 2.4vdmm, boot from cd, press c, 3, 5,enter,0. This will run block moves on you memory. It will take about 45 sec to complete one pass with 1 GB kit. If the memory can't handle the timings @ that speed it will error immediately or @ 98-99% completion of test. If it errors, hit ESC, raise vdmmm and retry. After you get about 10-20 successful passes without error, then you should be good for starters but not necessarily stable. I found that my ram could run 1mb - 32mb Pi @ extreme speeds, but couldn't complete 5 passes of memtest without errors or orthos blend. If the sticks are good they will pass 4-8 hours of memtest @ 4-3-2-X 2.4-2.5v. It took 2.5v for my 8000UL's they had a few errors on one pass though.
http://img.techpowerup.org/061115/Picture 004.jpg
Timings 4-3-2-1 so cas 4 trcd 3 trp 2 tras 1Quote:
Originally Posted by SuAsDu
for anyone curious...
I tested my 5400UL's in my 680i last night, and the results are well, unpredictable in many unforseen ways... some good, some not so good.
heres the break down.
same ram, used for 2 different boards over the last few months.
P5B Deluxe, tops out at cas 4-3-2-8 at 1080 mhz, cas 4-3-3 to about 1.1 ghz, then can clockgen it up to 1140 before it crashes.
for the P5B Deluxe, theres no benifit from going to cas 4-4-4... the ram OC's exactly the same, and has the same exact wall, and requires the exact same voltage.... zero benifit from cas 4-4-4 in my case.
same ram... on my Asus 680i...
tops out at just under 1 ghz, no matter what latency I use.
so the top is lower then I expected...
BUT
on the 680i, it seems to be really really easy for me to run cas 3-2-2-8-1T at 775mhz, and almost 800 mhz :D.
which I dont know about you, but I found that really fun to try, finally seeing true tight latencies on a Intel CPU at 1T is new for me.
running cas 4-3-2 isnt as stable on this board for some reason too when at 1T. running cas 4-3-3 takes less voltage and is easier to do up to 900 mhz at 1T.
2T gained me nothing.... nada... zilch.... nothing.
point being, I have tested 5 different sets of ram on the 680i so far.
not one set of ram did what I expected it to do.
some do incredibly well, some do worse, others (like my 5400UL here) have a lower OC limit... but are able to run much tighter latencies then I ever had achieved on the P5B Deluxe.
oh yeah, cas 2-2-2-5-1T, at 500 mhz, is easy too.
now, noooooooooo one can say DDR2 is slower then DDR1, cause with the 680i boards, you can do exactly the same thing as DDR1 can do, cas 2 and 1T.
sooooooo....
if your expecting specific results, and the info your going by, is from users with 975 or 965 boards, and are trying this on a 680i board, dont be at all surprised if your results are not what you thought they would be.
they are very different on this board.
now I am curious to see if this ram can run cas 1 or ras to cas 1 or TRP 1....
I mean.... if it can do cas 2-2-2, why not try cas 1... its there to try :)
I have no idea why you seem to have it stuck in your head that it won't have these chips in it. 5400ul v1.5 will have d9 fatbody in it, no matter what.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Nemesis
Really? when you say "fat body" do you mean the D9DQT or D9DQW chips or do you mean any D9. If the v1.5 will have either of those chips on them I'll buy 'em now. I don't care what other's results are specifically, I just want sticks with the D9DQT's or D9DQW's like my 8000UL's. I can mix em then or reprogram the spd's so they all match. D9DQT or D9DQW chips will do ddr2-1000 4-3-2-X peroiod. The only difference I've seen is some kits need more volts than others.Quote:
Originally Posted by DragonOrta
If you are certain they will have D9DQT or D9DQW LMK so I can buy 'em.:)
Corsair 5400UL, or 8000UL both have Fatbody D9 in them.... no matter what version you get.
Hey folks.
Well.. here are my results with the 5400UL v1.5.
I am using P5B-Dlx 0711, and the board is vDDR modded.
I was running around 2.5~2.6vDDR. Sorry.. I forgot to bring my volt meter today :(
So here is my result with 32MB Spi. Sorry.. I didn't have time to run memtest:
3-3-2-8 @ 862Mhz
4-4-4-8 @ 1120Mhz
For some reason, it didn't like 5-5-5-12. It just restarted at the speed the Cas 4 was stable at. I didn't really have time to investigate. But I know you folks are interested with the results of the v1.5, so I wanted to share those w/ everyone right away.
These mem aren't that bad, but not spectacular in my books. My Geil PC8000 Plus can do Cas 4 @ 1200 w/ the same voltage, and those are 2x1GB setup.
If you need cheap DDR2 that can do tight timing, but can't afford the 2GB setup at the same price, I would definitely buy them. Cas4 @ 1100+ Mhz isn't anythign to sneeze at.
Ok folks.. taht is it for me.. need to go prep for Turkey Day and Black Friday :D
SAD
No 4-3-2-1 or 3-2-2-1? :(
My 8000ul's ;)
http://www.sspmustang.com/OT/x3060/3...ual1m-run1.jpg
^^What vdimm?
2.65 bios, 2.67-8 with DMM.Quote:
Originally Posted by nicepun
Yikes! & I thought my 2.55V 4-3-2-4 DDR2-1000 was being extreme.Quote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
I run 2.55v daily on my D9GMH... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by The Nemesis
On my fatties I might run 2.65v daily, at least until they die. If 4:5 works well with a Xeon 3070, I might only have to run 2.45...
If anyone is still interested, there are only 3 sets left as of 10:00 AM (East Coast time zone).
OOS, let's se if they get more. Other people should post results as well.
I can get 583 4-3-2-1 with my 8000UL's @2,8volts, that performance is the same than 3-3-3-1, so here is the point of Fat Body, imagine D9GMH@600 3-3-3, good fattys can do 600 4-3-2-1, too bad that's only on 2x512mb... My 2x1gb fatty are only capable of 525 4-3-2-1 @2,8volts... :(
Regards! :toast:
PS: i've just tested 2x1gb fatty vs 2x1gb ballistix pc5300 d9gmh, same spi time 800 4-3-2-1 than 800 3-3-3-1. ;)
Only $130?
I had no idea these were so cheap. Gotta bookmark that link. ;)
just bought 1 set.
only 1 set left, who will get it?:stick:
Any more results guys?
Just got mine in. v1.5. I'll give 'em a quick test.
Can't wait for your results:)Quote:
Originally Posted by DragonOrta
Ditto............:)Quote:
Originally Posted by DragonOrta
should be receiving them today. However I don't have my mobo yet heh so it's just another piece of hardware I can't use :(. though that infinity does look awfully attractive.
Well I don't know what happend because after I insalled this ram I can't no longer do 400+FSB, even after I put the 8000ULs back, however, I does 1000Mhz 4-3-2-4 @ 2.45vdimm just fine.
1000mhz 4-3-2-4 is no problem for the set I got @ 2.4v. Once I get the 560w Zeus PSU that I ordered from East Luna in, I'll be able to give them a try in my Biostar 965PT that had a vdimm mod.
I did :)Quote:
Originally Posted by KaptainBlaZzed
WILL HAVE THEM TOMORROW! I just modded my biostar tforce 965p-t and it runs 2.5v+ no problem at all. So tomorrow I will show some benchies as well.
-Collin-
I think I would rather have 1 GB sticks too. TigerDirect has apparently high binned GMH (Crucial Ballistix, DDR2-1000, 5-5-5-15) for $238.99: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...Tab=0&NoMapp=0Quote:
Originally Posted by ^don.k's^
EDIT: Umm... that's $238.99 for 1GB... ooops.
Are these lower binned Fat Bodies (5400UL v1.5) so much better than Crucial Ballistix DDR2-1000 or should I send them back?Quote:
So here is my result with 32MB Spi. Sorry.. I didn't have time to run memtest:
3-3-2-8 @ 862Mhz
4-4-4-8 @ 1120Mhz
For some reason, it didn't like 5-5-5-12. It just restarted at the speed the Cas 4 was stable at. I didn't really have time to investigate. But I know you folks are interested with the results of the v1.5, so I wanted to share those w/ everyone right away.
These mem aren't that bad, but not spectacular in my books. My Geil PC8000 Plus can do Cas 4 @ 1200 w/ the same voltage, and those are 2x1GB setup.
If you need cheap DDR2 that can do tight timing, but can't afford the 2GB setup at the same price, I would definitely buy them. Cas4 @ 1100+ Mhz isn't anythign to sneeze at.
anybody else have any results? I'm still waiting for RD600 heh.
What is the max your set will do at 4-4-4?Quote:
Originally Posted by nicepun
My 2 sets came so I am ready to rock and roll. I just want to know what you guys are running so I have something to compare.
Just finished my volt mod on the biostar tforce 965p-t...here are my results are 2.45v.
[img]http://www.collinsacks.com/images/hosting/e6300_1.JPG[.img]
I love this ram.
-Collin-