DFI LanParty UP ICFX3200-TR2/G - (Ati RD600 for Core 2 - is here)

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

09-19-2006, 11:34 AM
OBR

DFI LanParty UT ICFX3200-TR2/G - (Ati RD600 for Core 2 - is here)

Last ATI high-end chipset for Core 2 is close ... look at official spec ...

http://www.pctuning.cz/ilustrace3/fi...x3200-t2rg.pdf
09-19-2006, 11:40 AM
nn_step

Quote:

128-bit Dual-channel memory architecture
4 240-pin DDRII DIMM sockets 8GB in max.
1
Supports unbuffered, single/double-side DDRII-667/800 DI
Supports x8/x16, non-ECC and up to 1GB DDRII devices

umm how the :banana::banana::banana::banana: does it support 8Gb them? :confused:
09-19-2006, 11:42 AM
ettis

woho! Though, why only 2x8 pci-e16? Me want 2x16! :mad:
09-19-2006, 11:43 AM
OBR

Quote:

Originally Posted by ettis

woho! Though, why only 2x8 pci-e16? Me want 2x16! :mad:

this mobo have 3x PCIx16! i am sure it is mistake in sheet only ....:)
09-19-2006, 11:45 AM
ettis

Quote:

Originally Posted by OBR

this mobo have 3x PCIx16! man ....:)

Yeah, and the last one is only x2. I want at least 2x16 + 1xsomething or even better 3x16 lanes ^^
09-19-2006, 12:16 PM
Vassili

Quote:

Originally Posted by nn_step

umm how the does it support 8Gb them? :confused:

I think I has something to do with the PCI-E devices not with the memory. But I don't know why there should be a limitation on the memory used on a PCI-E device?:confused:

Anyone how saw this in the PDF:
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version http://www.fineprint.com

:lol2: :lol2:
09-19-2006, 01:48 PM
cantankerous

I hope this board/bios has some of the features I have come to love from my Ultra-D such as thermal throttling for the onboard 3 pin fan headers depending on temps which of course is user defined as well as the power on by set date/time. I have found this very usefull a few times when im not around and need my pc booted up itself for whatever reason.

I too am a little weary on the 2 x 8x pcie slots. I was hoping for 2 x 16x for the upmost in performance even if only by a margin when compared to 2 x 8x slots.
09-19-2006, 01:54 PM
3NZ0

Quote:

Originally Posted by ettis

Yeah, and the last one is only x2. I want at least 2x16 + 1xsomething or even better 3x16 lanes ^^

um...why?:stick:

dont need anything faster than whats been supplied.

2*8x slots is good enough for sli/xfire

and the 2x slot easily provides more than enough bandwidth for a physics card
09-19-2006, 02:38 PM
[XC] hipno650

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3NZ0

um...why?:stick:

dont need anything faster than whats been supplied.

2*8x slots is good enough for sli/xfire

and the 2x slot easily provides more than enough bandwidth for a physics card

and you know this how? the only disapointment is the 2x8 lanes and the 2x lane they should have aleast made it 4x. but if it can oc as well as the 965 we will have a real winner!!!!!:slobber:
09-19-2006, 02:39 PM
Knight

I was hoping for pictures of the board. I guess we just have to wait a little bit longer. :cool:
09-19-2006, 02:41 PM
ozzimark

Quote:

Originally Posted by hipno650

and you know this how? the only disapointment is the 2x8 lanes and the 2x lane they should have aleast made it 4x. but if it can oc as well as the 965 we will have a real winner!!!!!:slobber:

there are plenty of reviews showing that the difference is minimal, though i guess here at XS, every bit counts when trying to break records :D
09-19-2006, 02:42 PM
[XC] hipno650

Quote:

Originally Posted by ozzimark

there are plenty of reviews showing that the difference is minimal, though i guess here at XS, every bit counts when trying to break records :D

good to hear but this is xs:D and everyone want's the absolute best!!!!!!
09-19-2006, 02:55 PM
nn_step

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vassili

I think I has something to do with the PCI-E devices not with the memory. But I don't know why there should be a limitation on the memory used on a PCI-E device?:confused:

Anyone how saw this in the PDF:
PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version http://www.fineprint.com

:lol2: :lol2:

I'm thinking fake
09-19-2006, 03:12 PM
Nephilim

Quote:

Originally Posted by nn_step

I'm thinking fake

I'm thinking the same. That document has a very low level of polish.

Things like the DFI banner simply having had the hue changed to make the features on the board blue and purple... when have DFI made a board that looks like that?

DFI could also put pictures of the product on marketing information. It just looks like someone has gone by the initial specs in the DFI roadmap and extrapolated some features and made some assumptions...

But we'll see
09-19-2006, 03:46 PM
dicecca112

that and this DDRII667 is PC6400 and DDRII800 is PC7100 um isn't it 5300 and 6400? Also at the bottom look at the pic, it says it uses the Karjan Module for sound but it clearly shows Sound Headers. They wouldn't be there.
09-19-2006, 03:53 PM
RyderOCZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by nn_step

umm how the :banana::banana::banana::banana: does it support 8Gb them? :confused:

Because there are 2GB sticks of DDR-II, so you only need 4 slots for 8GB.
09-19-2006, 04:07 PM
Fr3ak

Fake or not, I want that board asap, my P5W just died half an hour ago.
Hopefully it will be fine with Seasonic PSUs this time.
09-19-2006, 04:10 PM
Shift

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyderOCZ

Because there are 2GB sticks of DDR-II, so you only need 4 slots for 8GB.

I was getting confused on that same part. Where can you get a one 2gb stick?
09-19-2006, 04:12 PM
[XC] DragonOrta

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyderOCZ

Because there are 2GB sticks of DDR-II, so you only need 4 slots for 8GB.

But it says that is accepts modules up to 1gb, which wouldn't include 2gb sticks.
09-19-2006, 04:18 PM
RyderOCZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by DragonOrta

But it says that is accepts modules up to 1gb, which wouldn't include 2gb sticks.

Its not 1GB as in module size, its 1Gb (Gigabit...IC density)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Latoron

I was getting confused on that same part. Where can you get a one 2gb stick?

You can get it here: http://www.ocztechnology.com/product...s_dual_channel

As well as several other manufacturers: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=115803
09-19-2006, 04:25 PM
[XC] DragonOrta

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyderOCZ

Its not 1GB as in module size, its 1Gb (Gigabit...IC density)

Oh, ok. Makes sense now.
09-19-2006, 05:24 PM
nn_step

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyderOCZ

Its not 1GB as in module size, its 1Gb (Gigabit...IC density)

SO you are basically saying that should 2Gb module sizes come out, it would not support them.. ok
09-19-2006, 05:33 PM
RyderOCZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by nn_step

SO you are basically saying that should 2Gb module sizes come out, it would not support them.. ok

Correct, it doesn't say it supports 2Gb IC Density, otherwise the max ram would be 16GB.
09-19-2006, 06:17 PM
Nedjo

RD580, and I guess same for RD600 supports 48 PCIe lanes. If SB600 is connested with 4 of them, it remains 44 for the PCIe slots it would make sense to have 2x16 for CrossFire, and 1x8 for PhysX, and 4 foru what ever reason (say additiona RAID controller). 2x8 for grapphics, and 1x2 for physix is just under high expectations!

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/7...d600ob5.th.gif

So I'm with nn_step guessing this PDF is fake!
09-19-2006, 08:23 PM
b0bd0le

totally fake

seriously, zoom in at the io panel

it's like a drunk 4 year old did that in ms paint
09-19-2006, 08:46 PM
kLLa142

Quote:

Originally Posted by RyderOCZ

Its not 1GB as in module size, its 1Gb (Gigabit...IC density)

Doesn't the document say GB (gigabyte) though? I smell a fake also, wtf is up with the purple board.
09-19-2006, 08:53 PM
RyderOCZ

Ok....after actually looking at what you guys are looking at......I agree.

But what I was talking about....1Gb densities on IC's will allow 2GB modules to be made, etc. regardless of this board being real or fake :)
09-19-2006, 09:29 PM
SMa

Look at Note1:
DDRII667 = PC6400
DDRII800 = PC7100

Look at chipset:
not ligned up like it should be

Like b0bd0le says, tha IO Panel... nice paintskills

I think RD600 was supposed to have at least 2 x16 lanes. Xpress 3200 chipset has this already, so why would they go back to x8.

I hope it won't be purple like the boards on the bottom of the pages...
09-20-2006, 12:50 AM
OBR

Its not fake, only home-made reproduction of REAL email from DFI ....
09-20-2006, 12:57 AM
nn_step

one would think should it be a replica, should they not put more time and effort to be technically correct?
09-20-2006, 01:31 AM
OBR

Source of this spec is European retailer of DFI, with very good connections to DFI.
09-20-2006, 01:34 AM
camouflage

:D FSB 750 is coming up on horizon.......................:eek: :eek: :eek:
09-20-2006, 01:56 AM
G H Z

Quote:

Originally Posted by SMa

I think RD600 was supposed to have at least 2 x16 lanes. Xpress 3200 chipset has this already, so why would they go back to x8.

No the original material straight from DFI on this board was never 2X16 graphics lanes. It's has been said time and time again and people refuse to believe it for some reason. The saving grace is supposedly the isolated PCIe lanes for graphics which can be overclocked much further than previous boards.
09-20-2006, 06:04 AM
Revv23

Yeah rd600 was believed from the beggining to have 2x8x, i remember because lots of people were angry that it had 2x8 while the rd580 had 2x16.

However, this got lost in hundreds of other rumors and now i dont know what to believe.
09-20-2006, 10:05 AM
Cobalt

Quote:

Originally Posted by SMa

Look at chipset:
not ligned up like it should be

Like b0bd0le says, tha IO Panel... nice paintskills

You have no idea what you are talking about. The reason for the "mspaint look" is that it is a 16bit image rather than 32bit, hence the dithering. Other than that everything lines up fine, which you would know if you looked at the image for more than 2 seconds :rolleyes:

Quite apart from the fact that this image is already known to be genuine and was posted a while ago.:slapass:
09-20-2006, 01:35 PM
thephenom

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nedjo

RD580, and I guess same for RD600 supports 48 PCIe lanes. If SB600 is connested with 4 of them, it remains 44 for the PCIe slots it would make sense to have 2x16 for CrossFire, and 1x8 for PhysX, and 4 foru what ever reason (say additiona RAID controller). 2x8 for grapphics, and 1x2 for physix is just under high expectations!

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/7...d600ob5.th.gif

So I'm with nn_step guessing this PDF is fake!

You still have to count in the gigabit NIC, each of them takes up 1 pci-e lane.
09-20-2006, 03:05 PM
Metroid

Ohh crap spec:(
09-21-2006, 09:57 PM
Topheistos

Yeah, what lazy specs. :slapass: I thought it

should official:
-Support FSB 1333, RAM 1066 (but anyway interessting what's inofficial :D)
-missing LP CF Bridge at asses ;).

may has:
-8 Phase PWM
-2x16 Lanes (because it was ALWAYS stated it has 48 Lanes, also ATI referenceboard and so for WTH should they use it if not 2x16 Slots?)
-1 native LAN we'll see what this LAN "Feature" will bring us.

I haven't seen something about CMOS Backup? :stick:
And why has it AMD Certifications if it's an Intel Board? I know Intel don't want to have this chipset but why AMD? j4f since AMD and ATI merged?

Quote:

Originally Posted by camouflage

:D FSB 750 is coming up on horizon....................... :eek: :eek: :eek:

What are you talkin about????

EDIT (2): Btw. title should be DFI LanParty UT ICFX3200-T2R/G or? As its on Roadmap.
09-21-2006, 10:13 PM
b0bd0le

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobalt

You have no idea what you are talking about. The reason for the "mspaint look" is that it is a 16bit image rather than 32bit, hence the dithering. Other than that everything lines up fine, which you would know if you looked at the image for more than 2 seconds :rolleyes:

Quite apart from the fact that this image is already known to be genuine and was posted a while ago.:slapass:

yeah ok please stop talking, i don't even have to explain how fake this picture is, and the pdf that goes with it

fyi, i had photoshop dither this to 8bit

http://img128.imageshack.us/img128/4...iopanelns3.gif
09-21-2006, 11:12 PM
turtle

Quote:

Originally Posted by Topheistos

Yeah, what lazy specs. :slapass: I thought it [officially supported] FSB 1333, RAM 1066 (but anyway interessting what's inofficial :D)

Nope, officially 1066 FSB, flaunted as 1600 easily possible. That's why if Kentsfield would have been 1333 they'd have been kicking ATi in the balls...At least that's what I took from the license agreement rumors and possibilities. They couldn't have officially supported them per the chipset license.

Quote:

Originally Posted by digitimes

The sources also pointed out that Intel's licensing agreement with ATI limits the front-side bus (FSB) clock speed to 1066MHz and slower, so when Intel unveils its new FSB specification at 1333MHz next year, ATI may not be allowed to roll out chipsets supporting the new specification. Because of these reasons, the sources claimed that ATI has revealed to motherboard makers that it will not invest further in Intel platforms.

Instead of getting screwed out of Kentsfield, we will be screwed out of Nehalem (bloomsfield) which undoubtabley will be 1333 native fsb. From my understanding, 965/975/C55 will support them, but RD600 owners will be SOL. This is no doubt part of the reason AIB's pulled out of RD600 development.
09-22-2006, 01:38 AM
erwinz

nice insights you got there.. :D .. hope this board rocks.. :rocker: :rocker: :rocker:
09-22-2006, 02:39 AM
gOJDO

Posting crap and opening threads is very popular on XS
09-22-2006, 04:26 AM
LowRun

Quote:

Originally Posted by gOJDO

Posting crap and opening threads is very popular on XS

You're on your way to popularity then, at least for the first part.
10-04-2006, 01:51 AM
erwinz

any updates? :scope:
10-04-2006, 07:37 AM
Cobalt

Quote:

Originally Posted by b0bd0le

yeah ok please stop talking, i don't even have to explain how fake this picture is, and the pdf that goes with it

fyi, i had photoshop dither this to 8bit

http://img128.imageshack.us/img128/4...iopanelns3.gif

I thought you were talking about the actual pic of it not the crappy image in there. I thought we had already got over the fact it was a kake after the first few posts and were now talking about the actual board rather than some obvious fake.
10-04-2006, 08:13 AM
safan80

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cobalt

I thought you were talking about the actual pic of it not the crappy image in there. I thought we had already got over the fact it was a kake after the first few posts and were now talking about the actual board rather than some obvious fake.

You thought wrong.. it would help if we knew when this is going to be released and had some new pics to go with it.
10-11-2006, 02:03 PM
found404

New rd600 pics http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4513
10-11-2006, 02:07 PM
Revv23

love the new revision :) its so sexy.
10-11-2006, 02:17 PM
Sumanji

Cool, they sorted the PCI-E spacing... looks killer now :devil:
10-11-2006, 02:28 PM
HKPolice

I don't know why everyone thinks it's 2x 16x PCIe slots, it's even written in the PDF file that electrically, they are 2x 8x PCIe slots, and the last slot is 2x PCIe.

RD600 is basically a reversed engineered 975x chipset with improvements.
10-11-2006, 02:46 PM
3NZ0

2* floppy connector!!

GO AWAY :slap: :slapass:

(i hate floppy connectors, even more so when they are placed where they are on the mobo)
10-11-2006, 02:53 PM
Cooper

Additional Floppy power connectors on mobo :eek:
It`ll be alot of hasle to manage those two power cables just to get additional power to pcie slots
10-11-2006, 03:09 PM
HKPolice

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3NZ0

2* floppy connector!!

GO AWAY :slap: :slapass:

(i hate floppy connectors, even more so when they are placed where they are on the mobo)

Don't blame the chipset or DFI, blame 300w DX10 cards.
10-11-2006, 03:26 PM
Revv23

Quote:

Originally Posted by HKPolice

I don't know why everyone thinks it's 2x 16x PCIe slots, it's even written in the PDF file that electrically, they are 2x 8x PCIe slots, and the last slot is 2x PCIe.

RD600 is basically a reversed engineered 975x chipset with improvements.

well the PDF file im pretty sure is not real.

But you are right, Victor wang already confirmed 2x8x on the RD600 reference board.
10-11-2006, 03:56 PM
yaddam205

Well I think those specs are bogus... but anyway here are some "Offical" DFI RD600 board pics.

Source: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4513

http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/2...ge_Photo-1.jpg

http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/2...ge_Photo-2.jpg

Notice... NO EXTRA Floppy!
10-11-2006, 04:04 PM
[XC] moddolicous

What is that card in-between the audio out and the usb/ethernet.
10-11-2006, 04:07 PM
LordofDoom

I think that's the audio card. They did that with the s939 UT models too.
10-11-2006, 05:30 PM
Dumo

DFI TW.....Media samples should pop up any days now...followed by ES for reviewer then retail board.
10-11-2006, 06:13 PM
Pinnacle

Quote:

Originally Posted by yaddam205

Well I think those specs are bogus... but anyway here are some "Offical" DFI RD600 board pics.

Source: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4513

http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/2...ge_Photo-1.jpg

http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/2...ge_Photo-2.jpg

Notice... NO EXTRA Floppy!

This is what I just posted an hour before you, but Mr, Cooper decided to delete my thread:(
10-11-2006, 06:16 PM
vapb400

Wooooottt Its Finally Here
10-11-2006, 06:30 PM
Lestat

incase you didnt notice.. have fun with that ram with the video card sitting practically ontop of the ram latches.
10-11-2006, 06:36 PM
JuanFlaiter

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dumo

DFI TW.....Media samples should pop up any days now...followed by ES for reviewer then retail board.

I don´t think reviewers will get ES, maybe an early release. I hope the guys at DFI have my address :banana:
10-11-2006, 09:47 PM
erwinz

WOW!!!! :woot: a long wait will be finally over.. we can see some results.. only waitng is the nvidia for intel.. :D
10-11-2006, 09:47 PM
Sumanji

Quote:

Originally Posted by yaddam205

Notice... NO EXTRA Floppy!

I can see two... one above the front edge of each top PCI-E x16 slot. They could be fan headers but they're not afaics.

Suman
10-11-2006, 09:48 PM
Poodle

I just love the digital vrm... :slobber:

I've been waiting a long time for this board. Making friends with guys at e-tailers to make sure that I get one early. This waiting is killing me...
10-12-2006, 07:27 AM
yaddam205

Any word on a date?
10-12-2006, 07:55 AM
Sumanji

Quote:

Originally Posted by yaddam205

Any word on a date?

Adult friend finder for you I think :p::devil:
10-17-2006, 04:53 AM
maxxxxel

I would have thought the DFI board would have been reviewed by now. Whats going on?
10-17-2006, 04:58 AM
erwinz

mm.. I'm also waiting for the post of this board's review at the DFI-Street..

the waiting is killing me.. :(

mm.. hope its cheaper than the P5W DH.. :hehe:
10-17-2006, 01:44 PM
mursaat

C'mon DFI, haste or I'll get the AW9 :D
10-17-2006, 02:26 PM
3NZ0

Quote:

Originally Posted by HKPolice

Don't blame the chipset or DFI, blame 300w DX10 cards.

I didnt blame anyone or anything, i just wish they would use molex and put it somewhere, where it is easier to route cables.
10-17-2006, 02:35 PM
JamesAvery22

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3NZ0

I didnt blame anyone or anything, i just wish they would use molex and put it somewhere, where it is easier to route cables.

The whole point of those is to have less traces on the board though. Having the plug literally right next to the PCI-E slot eliminates long thick traces from the regulators around the ATX plug all the way to the PCI-E slot.
Putting the molex plugs any where else would just change from having thick traces from the PCI-E to the ATX plug to having thick traces from the PCI-E to the new molex plug. More of a side step than a step forward :)

Haven't looked at Intels ATX spec pdf in awhile but Im pretty sure the molex part isnt a standard. Just that the PCI-E slot has to be able to produce a certain amount of juice. Having the molex there just lessens costs and makes room for other crap on the board.
10-17-2006, 03:44 PM
nn_step

IS that Dual Digital Voltage regulation
10-17-2006, 05:25 PM
kemist

man i really hope this thing is all its cracked up to be because i want to build my next rig around it...
10-17-2006, 05:36 PM
Sneil

look how nice and clean it is around the cpu mount, perfect for phase change!
10-17-2006, 07:46 PM
Poodle

Quote:

Originally Posted by nn_step

IS that Dual Digital Voltage regulation

5 or 6 phase digital vrm. The latest word was 6 phase.
10-17-2006, 09:25 PM
Muunsyr

About the purple colour scheme...

I know this is jumping back a bit in the conversation, but the purple colour scheme looks like it is an older agp 478 board with the colours inverted (although the black pcb is still black - hmmm). Nothing wrong, just unsual and useless. However, if DFI were to make a board with that colour scheme I'd buy one straight away. I don't need it, but that electric purple colour, I think, just looks fantastic. Just my two cents.
10-17-2006, 10:52 PM
exhausted mule

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muunsyr

I know this is jumping back a bit in the conversation, but the purple colour scheme looks like it is an older agp 478 board with the colours inverted (although the black pcb is still black - hmmm). Nothing wrong, just unsual and useless. However, if DFI were to make a board with that colour scheme I'd buy one straight away. I don't need it, but that electric purple colour, I think, just looks fantastic. Just my two cents.

i'd rather have it the dfi green with oldschool beige connectors.
10-20-2006, 04:00 AM
camouflage

:D According to the pics I noticed the socket is placed pretty much upwards on the board with a lot of ICs and other stuff just around it.

So it will be a hard job to prepare it for phase change............:stick:

What do You think?

:toast:
10-20-2006, 04:06 AM
Vapor

Quite the opposite, there's nothing significant around the socket at all, certainly less than what's around the socket on all the other boards available due to the digital PWM.

Should be a very easy board to insulate as a matter of fact.
10-20-2006, 04:23 AM
camouflage

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vapor

Quite the opposite, there's nothing significant around the socket at all, certainly less than what's around the socket on all the other boards available due to the digital PWM.

Should be a very easy board to insulate as a matter of fact.

:rolleyes: Hm, maybe I had a wrong view on it......, if You say so I believe.

:toast:
10-20-2006, 04:23 AM
Vassili

Quote:

Originally Posted by nn_step

IS that Dual Digital Voltage regulation

I was wondering too why there are 2 IC's:confused:
10-20-2006, 09:45 AM
Poodle

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vassili

I was wondering too why there are 2 IC's:confused:

3 phases/chip?
10-20-2006, 09:47 AM
nn_step

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poodle

3 phases/chip?

Sounds possible or perhaps it is 4 phases/chip, making it an 8 phase board
10-20-2006, 10:10 AM
Poodle

Quote:

Originally Posted by nn_step

Sounds possible or perhaps it is 4 phases/chip, making it an 8 phase board

:) That would be awesome. I've heard 5 or 6 phases though Dfi might have increased them now when they changed the layout.

Maybe it's actually 5 phases/chip! :slobber: But that's probably wishfull thinking....
10-20-2006, 01:13 PM
Revv23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poodle

3 phases/chip?

Those are CPL-3-50 inductor chips, so yes, it is a 6 phase setup with 3 phases per chip...
10-20-2006, 01:43 PM
nn_step

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revv23

Those are CPL-3-50 inductor chips, so yes, it is a 6 phase setup with 3 phases per chip...

Got any links to data sheets?
10-20-2006, 01:48 PM
Pinnacle

Quote:

Originally Posted by nn_step

Got any links to data sheets?

We can ask you the same about the statments you make
10-20-2006, 01:50 PM
nn_step

True, at the same time I don't expect you to. If you can't find them or don't care to post them. It honestly doesn't bother me
10-20-2006, 08:33 PM
nn_step

After doing a little bit of research. I have come across some useful data
http://www.viteccorp.com/data/af4268.pdf
6 pins = 3 Phase
2 Chips = 6 Phase.

nice thing is that the above math works for current DFI NF590 boards.
10 pins on a side
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/957/13/index.html
http://images.tweaktown.com/imagebank/dfi590l_8.JPG

edit:
more info:
http://www.cooperet.com/library/prod...L%20Series.pdf
10-20-2006, 08:38 PM
Pinnacle

Quote:

Originally Posted by nn_step

After doing a little bit of research. I have come across some useful data
http://www.viteccorp.com/data/af4268.pdf
6 pins = 3 Phase
2 Chips = 6 Phase.

nice thing is that the above math works for current DFI NF590 boards.
10 pins on a side
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/957/13/index.html
http://images.tweaktown.com/imagebank/dfi590l_8.JPG

:woot: links from NN
10-20-2006, 09:51 PM
Poodle

Not I bad assumption from me, eh? Not that it was hard to make. :) Then we might see a board with two of the five phase chip seen above with 10 phases total in near future...

This thing about digital Vrm makes my e-penis stiffen some.... ;) The Dfi is sooo sexy.
10-21-2006, 08:55 AM
erwinz

nice features.. OC to the max.. :d hope we could see this board performs.. :D
10-23-2006, 10:02 AM
Poodle

So what's the proper name for it now? Is it DFI LanParty UP ICFX3200-TR2/G. or something with rd600 in it? i wonder because I've seen different from site to site. I need the proper name so I can get it right away. (contacts at e-tailers).
10-23-2006, 10:12 AM
Revv23

Quote:

Originally Posted by nn_step

Got any links to data sheets?

yup you found it, its first result on google :)

foxconn also used the 5-50 on thier digital vrm boards. This is the first time i have seen dual 3-50's. Maybe it will end up better.
10-23-2006, 10:17 AM
nn_step

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revv23

yup you found it, its first result on google :)

foxconn also used the 5-50 on thier digital vrm boards. This is the first time i have seen dual 3-50's. Maybe it will end up better.

Perhaps this means we could see a triple set of 5 stage chips for a 15 Phase onboard power regulation :slobber:
10-23-2006, 11:52 AM
LittleDevil

Can't wait to get that mobo :P

thanks
11-02-2006, 11:04 PM
Senater_Cache

getting close
11-03-2006, 12:03 AM
camouflage

:D 3phase, 6phase......., important but not most. What we need is at least Vcore 1.8, Vdimm 3.0 and Vmch 2.0............:stick:

If not - plz DFI put a manual for pencil mods into the box..........:fact:

:toast:
11-03-2006, 12:24 AM
exhausted mule

Quote:

Originally Posted by camouflage

:D 3phase, 6phase......., important but not most. What we need is at least Vcore 1.8, Vdimm 3.0 and Vmch 2.0............:stick:

If not - plz DFI put a manual for pencil mods into the box..........:fact:

:toast:

if they included the pencil as well that would be pretty cool.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:36 AM.

XtremeSystems