Cpu-z 1.33

[high5]

new version of CPU-Z is out! :)

changes:


Memory Command Rate timing added.
Improved support for Intel Conroe/Merom CPUs.
Celeron M 420/430 Yonah.
Xeon Dual core Dempsey.
VIA C7-M CPU detection added.
VIA PT880, PT880 Pro, K8T900 chipsets support.
nVidia nForce 550/560/570 (MCP55) chipset support.
VIA VT8251 southbridge support.
Fixed HyperTransport information misreports (in dump file).
Added K6-2 and K6-III logos.


direct link: http://www.cpuid.com/download/cpu-z-133.zip

CPU-Z site: http://www.cpuid.org/cpuz.php

report potential bugs here: http://forum.x86-secret.com/forumdisplay.php?f=16

preview:

45459

[eBoy0]

Nice!:toast:

[stummerwinter]

NICE!

:banana:

Up and running...;)

[Johnny Bravo]

excellent, glad to see command Rate timing added to the mix :up:

[JasonDTM]

He also added support for the CF revision of San Diego (Based off Toledo, 1 core disabled) I remember giving him my register dumps a month or so back heh.

[stummerwinter]

Nice work to CPUID - :toast:

[nn_step]

upgrading again.. Thank you for the notice.

[eddieate]

Added K6-2 and K6-III logos.
ha! thats a little late isint it?

[cpuz]

ha! thats a little late isint it?

Next time I'll add the 486 logos :D

This version uses a new method to classify the CPUs, that will be useful for the database. For example it will be possible to filter all CPUs based on the Netburst architecture, all CPUs based on K7, and so on.
This should allow to show the progression in time of an architecture (for example the decrease of the netburst when Conroe will be released). Should be interesting to follow.

[Waus-mod]

Great work as always franck :D keep the good work up!

[[XC] 4X4N]

Excellent! :toast: I've always wondered if the 1T 2T setting could be added.

[masterofpuppets]

I don't see anything added to the UI other than the 1t 2t display, but, I know lots has been tweaked under the hood, so I'm gonna give you a thumbs up. Awesome work, keep it up.

EDIT: Just opened it again and it said my vcore was EXACTLY 1.350v, closed it, opened it again, and now it says 1.568 (what my vcore actually is). :( Any chance of fixing this? :P

[ozzimark]

EDIT: Just opened it again and it said my vcore was EXACTLY 1.350v, closed it, opened it again, and now it says 1.568 (what my vcore actually is). :( Any chance of fixing this? :P
that's happened to me before, it'll sometimes read the cpu's stock voltage. i find that simply switching tabs and switching back normally fixes it. :confused:

[AgentGOD]

that's happened to me before, it'll sometimes read the cpu's stock voltage. i find that simply switching tabs and switching back normally fixes it. :confused:

I'm seeing the same problem... 1.32 worked. 1.32.1 did same thing...

[pik-ard v1.1]

not that it matters, but why does the memory tab now say DDR, and not DDR-SDRAM like it used to?

and again, nice addition of the command rate.

[ReD.SkY]

OT, but does this one still have the long loading time/ glitching problem?

[cpuz]

hey guys !
- the cpu vcore detection is not good in cpuz, it returns bad values very often. It definitely needs more work.
- yes I replaced DDR-SDRAM and DDR2-SDRAM by DDR and DDR2 respectively. I think it will me more clear, but let me know if not, I can restore it very easily.
- the loading time can be long because of SPD information gathering. I made some improvements, but still it can be slow,especially if you have a lot of memory sticks.

Anyway I'm continuing working on improvements in all these parts :)

[stummerwinter]

:clap:

Good work, go ahead!

[cupra]

great work, thx a lot :toast:

[TASOS]

Does this version of cpu-z ....detect the correct Vcore for Yonah cpu ?

[cpuz]

This depends on the mainboard more than the CPU.

[nn_step]

I wonder when they are going to add the 4004, 8008, and 8080 logos :D

[ixtapalapaquetl]

the loading time can be long because of SPD information gathering. I made some improvements, but still it can be slow,especially if you have a lot of memory sticks.I usually leave the SMBUS option off in the .ini file to speed things up. I turn it back on when verifying.

[Movieman]

Just wanted to publically thank CPUZ. A gentleman. Took a request for an oddball board for clockgen and tried to help out a stranger! Thank you!:toast:

[high5]

This version uses a new method to classify the CPUs, that will be useful for the database.
yeah, i noticed slight changes in detection w/ s754 Semprons:

45629

is this also the part of the new CPU classification method?

BTW great work cpuz, keep it up! :clap:

[pik-ard v1.1]

yeah, i noticed slight changes in detection w/ s754 Semprons:

[*ATTACH]45629[/ATTACH]

is this also the part of the new CPU classification method?

BTW great work cpuz, keep it up! :clap:
that reminds me of a request i was thinking of.

would it be possible for, in the bus speed box for AMD's, could you get it to show the overall bus speed (HTT x LDT multiplier)? i've forgotten sometimes what multi i used when OC'ing, and cant remember i'm approaching 1000mhz HTT or 1200mhz HTT. :rolleyes:

[high5]

yes, that could be nice addition.

[cpuz]

actually it was planned, but I faced some problems with Opteron CPUs as they have 3 HTT links. The most interesting one it the link with the host bridge I guess, still have to figure out which one it is.
HTT link speeds are reported in the register dump file, but based on 200MHz FSB.

[CHaynes112]

actually it was planned, but I faced some problems with Opteron CPUs as they have 3 HTT links. The most interesting one it the link with the host bridge I guess, still have to figure out which one it is.
HTT link speeds are reported in the register dump file, but based on 200MHz FSB.

CPUZ,

Since we are on the subject of Opterons and 3 HTT links... I am still curious on the entire Toldeo vs. Denmark situation. Has it ever been 'totally' clarified if Opteron DC 939-pin's are just Toledo cores like X2's or infact Denmark cores (hence the 3 x HTT)? I know CPU-Z used to report them as Toledo (haven't checked the new version), but I wasn't sure if it was reporting correctly or just couldn't properly identify Opteron DC 939's...?

-Thanks

[cpuz]

Unfortunately I'm confused as well. cpuz assumes that Opteron DC socket 939 are Toledo cores like AX2, and socket 940 are Denmark core. But I'm far from being 100% sure.

[The Coolest]

CPUZ,

Since we are on the subject of Opterons and 3 HTT links... I am still curious on the entire Toldeo vs. Denmark situation. Has it ever been 'totally' clarified if Opteron DC 939-pin's are just Toledo cores like X2's or infact Denmark cores (hence the 3 x HTT)? I know CPU-Z used to report them as Toledo (haven't checked the new version), but I wasn't sure if it was reporting correctly or just couldn't properly identify Opteron DC 939's...?

-Thanks
You guys confuse two completely different things. There is a thing called Core name/revision and CPU Code Name.
The X2 with 2x1MB L2 and the DC Opterons both use the JH-E6 core, its the same thing physically (architecturally), and all AMD chips have 3 HT links only the unneeded ones are disabled.
The code name on the other hand may be different. I guess I'm going to contact AMD and ask them if they consider s939 Opterons Denmarks or Toledos.
But really people should concentrate on the Core name/rev and not the processor code name.

[high5]

another good example of what The Coolest is talking about are Semprons.

90nm ones are codenamed Palermo while their actual cores are either Winchester or Venice. and 130nm Semprons codenamed Paris are in fact Newcastes.

[The Coolest]

another good example of what The Coolest is talking about are Semprons.

90nm ones are codenamed Palermo while their actual cores are either Winchester or Venice. and 130nm Semprons codenamed Paris are in fact Newcastes.
Precisely

[pik-ard v1.1]

actually it was planned, but I faced some problems with Opteron CPUs as they have 3 HTT links. The most interesting one it the link with the host bridge I guess, still have to figure out which one it is.
HTT link speeds are reported in the register dump file, but based on 200MHz FSB.
would it be possible to just have it activated on the CPU's that you can get it working on, then activate it on the troublesome opterons later?

and what's goin on with the validation? i keep getting "file not authorized".

[high5]

and what's goin on with the validation? i keep getting "file not authorized".
check this thread:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=1394239#post1394239

:)

[CHaynes112]

You guys confuse two completely different things. There is a thing called Core name/revision and CPU Code Name.
The X2 with 2x1MB L2 and the DC Opterons both use the JH-E6 core, its the same thing physically (architecturally), and all AMD chips have 3 HT links only the unneeded ones are disabled.
The code name on the other hand may be different. I guess I'm going to contact AMD and ask them if they consider s939 Opterons Denmarks or Toledos.
But really people should concentrate on the Core name/rev and not the processor code name.

I was aware that they are two different things, but I guess I didn't use the best wording in my crazy rambling :D

However, I was NOT aware that ALL chips have 3 HTT links and then some are disabled?!?! The is very interesting...

-LaTeR

[pik-ard v1.1]

check this thread:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=1394239#post1394239

:)
i'm not using tony's bios, i'm using the one straight from dfi's website.

and i downloaded the ODC fix version of 1.33, and it still happens...

maybe i'm missing something? :confused:

[The Coolest]

I was aware that they are two different things, but I guess I didn't use the best wording in my crazy rambling :D

However, I was NOT aware that ALL chips have 3 HTT links and then some are disabled?!?! The is very interesting...

-LaTeR
All the chips are basically the same, Opterons are just binned higher. There is no use for these links anyway as you're running single CPU. The chance of us finding a way to enabled these links is the same as finding a way to unlock (set higher Max multi) the multiplier.
As I said, there's no need for these extra HT links as you have nothing that can utilize them on single CPU mobo.

[CHaynes112]

All the chips are basically the same, Opterons are just binned higher. There is no use for these links anyway as you're running single CPU. The chance of us finding a way to enabled these links is the same as finding a way to unlock (set higher Max multi) the multiplier.
As I said, there's no need for these extra HT links as you have nothing that can utilize them on single CPU mobo.

Yeah, I remember reading a long time ago that the additional HTT links would only be used in a multi CPU environment... however, I don't understand why all chips have mutliple HTTs links (even if they are disabled)... I am guessing one design reduces production costs... Anyways, exactly how are Opterons binned higher? I mean, what type of 'binning' has an Opteron 175 "passed", that an Athlon 64 X2 4400+ hasn't...?

[The Coolest]

Opterons go through more rigorous testing, they are server parts, thus need to meet higher stability requirements

[high5]

maybe i'm missing something? :confused:
as soon as the new version is out you can't validate using old one.

did you try with 1.33.1?

[pik-ard v1.1]

"and i downloaded the ODC fix version of 1.33, and it still happens..." <-- v1.33.1 i believe?

yes, i did. the version of cpu-z i have now says 1.33.1. still doesn't validate...

can you validate with 1.33.1?

[cpuz]

pik-ard : can you please send me your cvf ?

[pik-ard v1.1]

i figured out why it wasn't working... cpu-z was saving the files without an extention. is that supposed to happen?

it says "CVF file (*.cvf)" in the "save as type" box, but doesn't actually save it as one for me.

yes, i realized this when i was figuring out which way would be best to send you the file... so thanks. :D

[Xassius]

http://www.wikihardware.com/wiki/index.php?title=CPU-Z

Just whipped up a quick page on CPU-Z. Hope it's alright :stick:

[cpuz]

yes it is !
Thanks a lot :toast:

[Escobar999]

just wanted to say thnx for the AWESOME program u have put up together, i use it all the time and its just awesome.

thnx again for the all time u dedicate to this program. we all love it!
keep the good work coming bro!!!