9600 beaten by geforce4600ti in 3dmark01 [Archive]

c0rpu5m3tal

10-16-2005, 11:20 PM

was benching yesterday on my 9600pro 256mb wen i decided to get the old geforce 4600ti 128mb for a bench just out of curiosity

much to my amazement the 4600ti beat my 9600 in 3dmark01 by a clear 1500p

powercolor radeon 9600pro@450/444 - 13800p
Leadtech nvidia geforce4600ti@stock!! - 15400

anybody else noticed this???

the rest ov my rig is........

a64 3400 clawhammer skt 754
abit KV8 pro
crutual mem 1gig (2x 512)

cirthix

10-17-2005, 12:39 AM

the scores look normal to me. 9600s arent very good cards..

Vapor

10-17-2005, 12:47 AM

That's normal...Ti4600 is a very good DX8 and lower card.

c0rpu5m3tal

10-17-2005, 03:30 AM

ahh...............i did realise that the 4600ti was a good dx8 card jus didnt think it would stand up so well to a dx9 card even though it is a 9600pro
spose it was on 3dmark2001se. the points drop considerabley when benching on 2003 (2500)

i seem to have underestemated the 4600ti

craig588

10-23-2005, 12:44 PM

A 4600 to 9600 is not an upgrade. If you skip the nature test in '03 on your 9600 you will get a score like the 4600 scores in '03.

m3csl2004

10-23-2005, 01:06 PM

yeah - the 9600s suck - i wanna bench 1 against my old 8500le to see what happens (which destroys my 9200se in both benching and real world)

Ackbar

10-23-2005, 09:49 PM

For more 9600 suckage please tune in to:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=77428

You may now return to your regular broadcast already in progress.

c0rpu5m3tal

10-24-2005, 01:54 AM

oh dear.......... 9600s suck big donkey balls
i 2 have tried that fear demo with my 9600 and again

9600 SUCK!!!!!

GOESA

10-24-2005, 02:04 AM

remember a 9600 is an old card now.. very actually, but it is much better than a Ti4600 i tell you... check score in my sig.!

/Grau

ent

10-24-2005, 04:45 AM

c0rpu5m3tal yours 9600Pro is 400/200(400ddr) default? Normal 9600Pro were clocked 400/600. 9600Pros are faster than 4Ti in some games (GTA:SA, Doom3).
My 9600Pro score:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8675792

kiwi

10-24-2005, 12:26 PM

ehh, I remember old days when Ti4x00 were high end cards :D
:toast:

NickS

10-24-2005, 03:47 PM

Dude any old nV card r0x0rs. My old Geforce 2 GTS 64MB AGP 4x beat my old GeForce 5200 (w/double the RAM) my 30 points in 3D Mark 2001. :D

c0rpu5m3tal

10-24-2005, 11:21 PM

ent

10-25-2005, 02:51 AM

Yep. Powercolor radeon 9600pro default= 398/202

Nice score :slobber:
Thanks, my card is 400/300(600) default, but it has real bad power managment, so I can't give her more V :D

-Acid-

10-26-2005, 12:55 AM

what is stock for a 9600 xt then

freeagent

10-26-2005, 07:46 AM

what is stock for a 9600 xt then

My sapphire 9600XT is stock at 500/300 but scales to 600/351 completely stock, with catalyst drivers, and ati tray tool.

-Acid-

10-26-2005, 10:44 AM

thanks mate

dippyskoodlez

11-22-2005, 11:44 AM

My sapphire 9600XT is stock at 500/300 but scales to 600/351 completely stock, with catalyst drivers, and ati tray tool.

yeah.. my 9600xt did pretty well too... They are about on par with the Ti's until you throw some more advanced shaders into the mix, where they just leave em in the dust.. :toast:

[XC] Lead Head

11-22-2005, 07:00 PM

I only got a vanila saphire radeon 9600, stock is 325/200(400) . I screwed a little fan onto its passive heatsink and i can get it to 460/237-240(474-480). I am ok with it though, i get between 75-105 FPS OCed in half life 2 maxed out at 2x FSAA, and abou 55-95 FPS in ut2004 with everything maxed out, both games at 1024x768 but strangley i only get 20-40FPS in halo with everything maxed out

-Acid-

11-23-2005, 01:25 AM

i got a new 9600xt 256mb version but it was dead on arrival grrrrr so i,m awaiting an Rma so i can have a play with it.

Celeron Gamer

11-23-2005, 06:56 PM

Note that 9600PRO should overclock to 500/650-700 without a hitch

c0rpu5m3tal

11-24-2005, 05:50 AM

Note that 9600PRO should overclock to 500/650-700 without a hitch

Having probs getting anywer near that!!!!!!! VPU can scale to 500 no probs but can't get mem over 225(450) with new drivers!! (on air)

Gorod

11-25-2005, 03:27 AM

Nah :p: , GF4 Ti's OWN in 2001 :D

My old GF4 Ti4200 (only 4ns VRAM :( ) 3DMark2001 score : 20186 ;)

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8633468

sabrewolf732

11-25-2005, 11:46 PM

yeah.. my 9600xt did pretty well too... They are about on par with the Ti's until you throw some more advanced shaders into the mix, where they just leave em in the dust.. :toast:

ti's > 9600's. My 4600 raped your 9600xt :p:

freeagent

11-26-2005, 04:40 PM

ti's > 9600's. My 4600 raped your 9600xt :p:
:rofl: :bananal:

I loved my 9600xt, i killed my nf7 a few weeks ago, so i doubt ill be able to use that card again. I just broke 15k in 01 with it too lol. quake 4 and fear kicked that cards ass so bad, kinda like playing doom 3 on a 9200, but smoother, and with prettier colours :D :woot:

ahmad

11-27-2005, 07:46 PM

Turn on 2xAA and see which card survives. Also, ti has no chance of playing of the new games (aoeIII, quake4, nfs mw, etc..).

sabrewolf732

11-28-2005, 06:49 PM

Turn on 2xAA and see which card survives. Also, ti has no chance of playing of the new games (aoeIII, quake4, nfs mw, etc..).

Actually, ti4600 can play doom 3 better than a 9600 pro from what I have seen, so it should be able to play quake 4. idk about the other games. idk... 9600 pros just suck in my experiance. :p:

sabrewolf732

11-28-2005, 06:50 PM

:rofl: :bananal:

I loved my 9600xt, i killed my nf7 a few weeks ago, so i doubt ill be able to use that card again. I just broke 15k in 01 with it too lol. quake 4 and fear kicked that cards ass so bad, kinda like playing doom 3 on a 9200, but smoother, and with prettier colours :D :woot:

I hit pretty high in 01 with my ti :D 17k iirc. My oc'ed well, 340MHz on core, but I don't remember ram, 750 I think :slap: