PDA

View Full Version : OCZ 2x1gb PC4000 EB.... My results so far..



Radelon
10-08-2005, 11:37 AM
I received this kit on Thursday and was very excited to have a new toy. First night the highest i could go to windows was 270. But now after playing for a few days, here's my current numbers.

Trice
10-08-2005, 11:41 AM
Nice man, I have the same sets (the ones they just released right?) what volts, bios, and dimm slots are you using with them?

oasked
10-08-2005, 11:45 AM
Thats insane! :)

What volts etc are you running at?

infiniti029
10-08-2005, 11:53 AM
nice, keep us posted with more tests at diff settings.

dnottis
10-08-2005, 11:58 AM
haha they must love the winnie memory controller

Vapor
10-08-2005, 12:26 PM
trc should equal tras + trp....so 9 in this case

Radelon
10-08-2005, 12:27 PM
Orange slots, 2.65v, 7/4 BT Bios.

I'll give that a shot jason......any other things you guys want me to try?

Oh yeah, this is a 3500+ Venice.... I haven't updated sig in a while.

Okda
10-09-2005, 09:40 AM
keep us updtaed with ur results please

tomati
10-09-2005, 09:43 AM
Nice shot there , 285 3-3-2-x , real good.

Tony
10-09-2005, 11:59 AM
nice but trc=10 is yukk try 7 you'll gian like .5s+ in 1m alone from trc=10 to trc=7 maybe even 1 full second

jason...setting TRC to 7 will gain nothing here, the only thing you actually may gain is a lower overclock and instability.

When setting the follwing timings you will want to do the following.

Applies to TRC, TRAS, TRFC.

Set to highest setting, work down slow till an increase in bandwidth is seen, make a note over the range of settings what gives the highest bandwidth then set the highest setting within that range.

So, say TRAS 5 to 10 give the best bandwidth with 11 dropping 80MB/s, setting 5 will close the open pages quickest but setting 10 may actually yield the most speed as nothing has to be reopened and re read.Setting 10 would be best.

TRC may have the same performance from 7 to 12, setting 7 will actually dial in instability for no gain in bandwidth so 12 would actually be better.

TRFC is not as criticle and for the lazy sods like me setting 24 is actually ok but it is actually best to set TRFC 2T higher than TRC so TRC at 12 and TRFC at 14 etc etc if you can, some times 3T is needed.

Hopes this clears things up for you all.

Tibu
10-09-2005, 12:04 PM
Wow this stuff is very good. I can't decide between these and Crucials Ballistix :stick:

Radelon
10-09-2005, 01:40 PM
This stuff is a blast to play with. With 2.5-3-2-6 I was able to hit 255 sticking at 2.65v. This stuff is probably the easiest ram to overclock. Tref is a huge thing with this ram. For example with TREF of 4708 it only went to 270. I changed that and now i use like 1536, 1552, 1560 which put me in the 285 range. I'm still really just trying to feel this ram out before I do 3d stuff. In sandra, unbuffered Mem Bench is like 3600/3600 but the ram feels so much faster than even TCCD at 310. I would definitely recommend this to anyone looking for a great 2gb kit. Stay tuned in the next 2 days I'll try and get some 3d benches up.

dnottis
10-09-2005, 01:49 PM
This stuff is a blast to play with. With 2.5-3-2-6 I was able to hit 255 sticking at 2.65v. This stuff is probably the easiest ram to overclock. Tref is a huge thing with this ram. For example with TREF of 4708 it only went to 270. I changed that and now i use like 1536, 1552, 1560 which put me in the 285 range. I'm still really just trying to feel this ram out before I do 3d stuff. In sandra, unbuffered Mem Bench is like 3600/3600 but the ram feels so much faster than even TCCD at 310. I would definitely recommend this to anyone looking for a great 2gb kit. Stay tuned in the next 2 days I'll try and get some 3d benches up.

The TREF really took you from 270 to 285? I played with it but obviously not enough if that really let you go that high. Can u 3d bench at 285 though?

Radelon
10-09-2005, 01:53 PM
Honestly haven't really tried to 3d bench that much I know it could be an issue so I'll give it a shot.

Radelon
10-09-2005, 07:19 PM
3d benches at 270.

tomati
10-09-2005, 08:03 PM
3d benches at 270.

nothing more ? or not enough time to try ?

Sephir0th
10-09-2005, 11:50 PM
This stuff is a blast to play with. With 2.5-3-2-6 I was able to hit 255 sticking at 2.65v. This stuff is probably the easiest ram to overclock. Tref is a huge thing with this ram. For example with TREF of 4708 it only went to 270. I changed that and now i use like 1536, 1552, 1560 which put me in the 285 range. I'm still really just trying to feel this ram out before I do 3d stuff. In sandra, unbuffered Mem Bench is like 3600/3600 but the ram feels so much faster than even TCCD at 310. I would definitely recommend this to anyone looking for a great 2gb kit. Stay tuned in the next 2 days I'll try and get some 3d benches up.

What was the formula for working out what tref(s) are best to use?

F@TMAN
10-10-2005, 02:20 AM
any experiences with ballistix, Radelon? Are you in a position to compare between them and ur EB kit? Purely on performance, though...

Radelon
10-10-2005, 04:09 AM
As for time, I'll have time tonight after work. TREF, you just try them all, within minutes at 270 you'll find ones that'll make it not work, just eliminate and keep moving along, eventually you'll find the ones that work the best. As for ballistix, no I have not had the chance to try them out so comparing is out of the question. I guess the real thing we should notice is the fact that Ballistix are hit or miss, some are great and some are not. With this EB, consistently everyone is hitting over 275. More to come.... g2g work....

eva2000
10-10-2005, 04:38 AM
Can confirm Radelon's findings... just got my 2x1GB OCZ PC4000EB Plat around 8+ hrs ago (so very early testing)

http://www.fileshosts.com/memory/ocz/2GB_PC4000EB/thumbnails/thumb_PC400EB_009.jpg (http://www.fileshosts.com/memory/ocz/2GB_PC4000EB/photos/PC400EB_009.html) http://www.fileshosts.com/memory/ocz/2GB_PC4000EB/thumbnails/thumb_PC400EB_022.jpg (http://www.fileshosts.com/memory/ocz/2GB_PC4000EB/photos/PC400EB_022.html) http://www.fileshosts.com/memory/ocz/2GB_PC4000EB/thumbnails/thumb_PC400EB_025.jpg (http://www.fileshosts.com/memory/ocz/2GB_PC4000EB/photos/PC400EB_025.html)

Just jumped straight into deep end and set ram at 10x285mhz 3-3-2-8 7-14-2222 at 2.64v vdimm and tried a bunch of TREFs and eventually found these 3 seem to produce the least errors

memtest86+ test #5 loop

TREF
1552 = 1 error at 38th pass after 59m 46s

1560 = 5 errors in total after 44 passes at 4th, 8th, 11th, 22nd and 32nd pass after 1hr 09m 18s

1536 = 11 errors in total after 29 passes at 6th, 10th, 13th, 17th, 20th, 23rd, 24th and 27th passes

so seems TREF 1552 is one to work with .. now to tweak the rest of the advance timings and voltages etc :)

For comparison for memtest86+ v1.55 reported bandwidth at

10x285mhz

2x1GB Crucial Ballistix PC4000 Tracer at 3-3-3-8 7-18-2223 1T at 2.76v = 3181MB/s rock stable in windows

vs

2x1GB OCZ PC4000EB Platinum at 3-3-2-8 7-14-2222 1T at 2.64v = 3377MB/s 1 error in memtest test #5 as shown above - so need ALOT more time to tweaking to see how it goes in for stable speeds but very promising as it's as easy to oc as Ballistixs!

F@TMAN
10-10-2005, 05:07 AM
awaiting all your results, nice to have you on board, eva! love your work
:D

SLi_dog
10-10-2005, 05:31 AM
For comparison for memtest86+ v1.55 reported bandwidth at

10x285mhz

2x1GB Crucial Ballistix PC4000 Tracer at 3-3-3-8 7-18-2223 1T at 2.76v = 3181MB/s rock stable in windows

vs

2x1GB OCZ PC4000EB Platinum at 3-3-2-8 7-14-2222 1T at 2.64v = 3377MB/s 1 error in memtest test #5 as shown above - so need ALOT more time to tweaking to see how it goes in for stable speeds but very promising as it's as easy to oc as Ballistixs!Good stuff eva, keep us posted. :slobber:

dnottis
10-10-2005, 07:14 AM
With this EB, consistently everyone is hitting over 275. More to come.... g2g work....

Not 3d benchable at 275 for the people posting..so far only FX chips can actually 3d bench at 270+ and a few people with winnies.

A few of us with San Diegos can run 280 Mhz in memtest and Super PI but max 3d benchable is 260 Mhz with Sandy cores. My venice let me 3d bench at 267 Mhz...

dnottis
10-10-2005, 07:18 AM
Can confirm Radelon's findings... just got my 2x1GB OCZ PC4000EB Plat around 8+ hrs ago (so very early testing)

http://www.fileshosts.com/memory/ocz/2GB_PC4000EB/thumbnails/thumb_PC400EB_009.jpg (http://www.fileshosts.com/memory/ocz/2GB_PC4000EB/photos/PC400EB_009.html) http://www.fileshosts.com/memory/ocz/2GB_PC4000EB/thumbnails/thumb_PC400EB_022.jpg (http://www.fileshosts.com/memory/ocz/2GB_PC4000EB/photos/PC400EB_022.html) http://www.fileshosts.com/memory/ocz/2GB_PC4000EB/thumbnails/thumb_PC400EB_025.jpg (http://www.fileshosts.com/memory/ocz/2GB_PC4000EB/photos/PC400EB_025.html)

Just jumped straight into deep end and set ram at 10x285mhz 3-3-2-8 7-14-2222 at 2.64v vdimm and tried a bunch of TREFs and eventually found these 3 seem to produce the least errors

memtest86+ test #5 loop

TREF
1552 = 1 error at 38th pass after 59m 46s

1560 = 5 errors in total after 44 passes at 4th, 8th, 11th, 22nd and 32nd pass after 1hr 09m 18s

1536 = 11 errors in total after 29 passes at 6th, 10th, 13th, 17th, 20th, 23rd, 24th and 27th passes

so seems TREF 1552 is one to work with .. now to tweak the rest of the advance timings and voltages etc :)

For comparison for memtest86+ v1.55 reported bandwidth at

10x285mhz

2x1GB Crucial Ballistix PC4000 Tracer at 3-3-3-8 7-18-2223 1T at 2.76v = 3181MB/s rock stable in windows

vs

2x1GB OCZ PC4000EB Platinum at 3-3-2-8 7-14-2222 1T at 2.64v = 3377MB/s 1 error in memtest test #5 as shown above - so need ALOT more time to tweaking to see how it goes in for stable speeds but very promising as it's as easy to oc as Ballistixs!



Great work!! Saves us alot of time!! Thank u!

A few of us with San Diegos can run 280 Mhz in memtest and Super PI but max 3d benchable is 260 Mhz with Sandy cores. My venice let me 3d bench at 267 Mhz... I will try lowering the TREF and see if 3d benching is now possible. Will report back

I just saw you have an FX, those are the only memory controllers than can 3d bench over 270 consistently. Ill still try and report

eva2000
10-10-2005, 07:52 AM
remember it's cpu mem controller dependent still heh but so far Radelon's winnie cpu TREF applies to my FX-57 sandy mem controller so far

dnottis
10-10-2005, 07:56 AM
Well I broke 260!!

3dmark just completed at 262 and its running 265 x 11 now!! Sweet, thanks again for the tip!

Dean

Radelon
10-10-2005, 10:08 AM
remember it's cpu mem controller dependent still heh but so far Radelon's winnie cpu TREF applies to my FX-57 sandy mem controller so far


It's actually a 3500+ Venice core. This ram is pretty amazing, I think with all of us working together we can get these stable in 3d a lot higher. I just knew once people started trying the 1500's in TREF that the numbers would go up. Actually try TREF's in the 1500-1800 range. Maybe on weaker cores we might even want to try below 1500. These are all things that need to be tested and I'm hoping I'll get to try them tonight.

Radelon
10-11-2005, 06:49 AM
Power went out last night during my testing but I will get the 3d benches up soon..... sorry for the wait guys...

eva2000
10-12-2005, 07:57 AM
Haven't done any 3dmark benchies yet but just testing with 32M first :)

Still using 623-3 bios

FX-57 0516 WPMW Water cooled
DFI NF4 UT SLI-DR R.AB0 623-3 Official bios
1x BFG 7800GTX 81.82 beta drivers
4x 80GB Hitachi 7K80 SATAII Raid 0
1x 250GB Maxtor Maxline Plus II PATA
Pioneer DVD Burner
Floppy drive
650W Silverstone SLI PSU

WinXP Pro SP2
NF4 6.53WHQL chipset drivers

12x250
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/MCW6002/SLI-DR/OCZ/2GB_PC4000EB/2_1/623_3/LDT4x/12x/250-250-3328-7-14-2212_1.45-1.3-1.6-2.64_1552_ds8ddsAUTO_7F5_8clk_16x7x/superpi-32m_tn.jpg

10x280
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/MCW6002/SLI-DR/OCZ/2GB_PC4000EB/2_1/623_3/LDT3x/10x/280-280-3328-8-16-2213_1.4-1.3-1.6-2.64_1552_ds8ddsAUTO_8F5_16clk_16x7x/superpi-32m_twk2_tn.jpg

10x282 <-- max i've tested so far 32M stable
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/MCW6002/SLI-DR/OCZ/2GB_PC4000EB/2_1/623_3/LDT3x/10x/282-282-3328-8-16-2213_1.4-1.3-1.6-2.64_1552_ds8ddsAUTO_8F5_16clk_16x7x/cpuz_validated_tn.jpg

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/MCW6002/SLI-DR/OCZ/2GB_PC4000EB/2_1/623_3/LDT3x/10x/282-282-3328-8-16-2213_1.4-1.3-1.6-2.64_1552_ds8ddsAUTO_8F5_16clk_16x7x/superpi-32m_twk_tn.jpg

eva2000
10-13-2005, 01:36 AM
seems 10x280mhz 3-3-2-8 like OCZ said stresses mem controller more and 3dmark2003 froze at GT1 with 2.64v vdimm, froze at GT4 with 2.69v vdimm and 3dmark2003 fully passed at 2.69v vdimm and at +0.25v more vcore to the cpu but the score seemed lower than usual.

But 11x274mhz 3-3-2-8 definitely works :)

Ran GT1 and GT4 (both most stressing on system) in 3dmark2003 in 40 loops @1600x1200 resolution with no probs

then did these

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/MCW6002/SLI-DR/OCZ/2GB_PC4000EB/2_1/623_3/LDT3x/11x/274-274-3328-8-16-2213_1.475-1.3-1.6-2.64_1552_ds8ddsAUTO_8F5_16clk_16x7x/superpi-32m_twk_tn.jpg

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/MCW6002/SLI-DR/OCZ/2GB_PC4000EB/2_1/623_3/LDT3x/11x/274-274-3328-8-16-2213_1.475-1.3-1.6-2.64_1552_ds8ddsAUTO_8F5_16clk_16x7x/3dmark_noSLI/3dmark2003_460-1300_18514_tn.jpg

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/MCW6002/SLI-DR/OCZ/2GB_PC4000EB/2_1/623_3/LDT3x/11x/274-274-3328-8-16-2213_1.475-1.3-1.6-2.64_1552_ds8ddsAUTO_8F5_16clk_16x7x/3dmark_noSLI/3dmark05_460-1300_8565_tn.jpg

guess2098
10-13-2005, 11:15 PM
man this is a great 2GB ram.... i just order one from newegg... hope i can max to 300 lolz

styyn
10-14-2005, 06:36 AM
man this is a great 2GB ram.... i just order one from newegg... hope i can max to 300 lolz

I just checked Newegg and they didn't have these sticks listed. I saw the PC4000 EL's, but no EB's. If you're sure you ordered EB's could you provide a link? If not, might want to cancel that order ;)

Radelon
10-14-2005, 10:43 AM
Sorry for the delay, been a long week. Here's my best settings for 3DMark 2003:

Bench Setup:

3500+ Venice
DFI NF4 Ultra-D 7/04 BT
2x1gb OCZ PC4000 EB
XFX 6600GT 560/1140
etc.

http://home.mchsi.com/~radelon/03272.gif

Radelon
10-14-2005, 10:44 AM
And for 3DMark 2005:

http://home.mchsi.com/~radelon/05270.gif

tomati
10-14-2005, 10:51 AM
Oh well , 270 under 3d app , that sound to be a good pair you catch there.

Radelon
10-14-2005, 11:07 AM
They will 3d bench both 2003 and 2005 up to 280, but scores drop. and 2001 is weird, no matter the setting it'll lock..... but everything else is 100% stable.

mcoleg
10-14-2005, 05:55 PM
I just checked Newegg and they didn't have these sticks listed. I saw the PC4000 EL's, but no EB's. If you're sure you ordered EB's could you provide a link? If not, might want to cancel that order ;)

yep, i was looking for those myself... any linkies?

guess2098
10-14-2005, 06:18 PM
yep, i was looking for those myself... any linkies?

i saw it wrong.... :slapass:
i found out yesterday and canceled it... hehehehehe
then i ordered from manora... how to spell that??

thx for the notice :)

Radelon
10-15-2005, 06:19 AM
On a side note 11x255 with 2.5-3-2-8 is faster than 10x272 in 2003 and 2005.

mcoleg
10-15-2005, 07:16 AM
i see. bummer...

kamongear
10-15-2005, 08:15 AM
Nice sticks you got there.

Radelon
10-15-2005, 08:27 AM
I guess I needed to be more clear 10x272 results in 9948 and 11x255 results in 9998. But there's also a 80mhz gap in cpu clocks. At 10x280 I think it would be a lot faster than 11x255. Nice thing though, the ram really likes being at 2.5-3-2 in the 250-260 range so it gives you plenty of options to match your cpu.

eva2000
10-15-2005, 08:46 AM
Radelon try 11x252mhz and see how it compares to 10x272 :)

Vapor
10-15-2005, 08:48 AM
I'd like to see a comparison at equal CPU speeds...247x11 and 272x10. :D

eva2000
10-15-2005, 08:52 AM
Whoops calculated it wrongly 11x247 - i'm guessing 10x272 would win then...

Radelon
10-15-2005, 09:36 AM
Your wish is my command:

http://home.mchsi.com/~radelon/03247.gif

Perc
10-15-2005, 09:53 AM
where the heck do you get these memorys at? can you give us a link? i am too trying to decide between these and the ballistix. wish the freakin newegg sold these...

thx perc,

Vapor
10-15-2005, 10:01 AM
atacom.com

goreblast
10-15-2005, 11:05 AM
Am I not correct in saying that as the 3DMark series has advanced from 2001, through 2003 and onto 2005 they have become less dependent on the system as a whole and more dependent on graphics cards. Therefore 2001 is a better indicator of overall system stability than either 03 or 05.

This will be why you are able to bench both 03 and 05 but not 01 without crashing. You would be far better getting it stable for 2001 if you are after a highest stable overclock rather than a screenie.

Radelon
10-15-2005, 11:23 AM
But I found 2001 was a driver issue, it runs fine now, Just don't wanna switch drivers, just for higher 2001 scores.

uOpt
10-15-2005, 01:24 PM
where the heck do you get these memorys at? can you give us a link? i am too trying to decide between these and the ballistix. wish the freakin newegg sold these...

http://www.pricegrabber.com/search.php?form_keyword=OCZ5002048EBPE-K
http://labs.anandtech.com/search.php?q=OCZ5002048EBPE-K

I'd get these over the Ballistix.

goreblast
10-15-2005, 01:40 PM
What about UK sellers? Overclock list item, but as a pre-order. Cant see them anywhere else.