Super PI with msec/anticheat mod [Archive]

snq

02-26-2005, 07:57 PM

Update!
The latest version with cheat protection, more accurate timing and checksum is available here (http://superpi.radeonx.com/)!
------------------------------------------

Well here it is!

My Super PI mod now also includes anti cheating code. Any attempt to cheat will now horribly fail. I changed the text in the titlebar so you will know from screenshots wether or not a cheatfree version was used.

If anyone does happen to find a way to cheat it please send me a PM telling me how you did it so I can add protection. I doubt people with the skills to cheat this version are seriously interested in faking results :)

Download here! (http://www.xtremesystems.com/pi/super_pi_mod-1.5.zip)
And feel free to spread the word!

I won't post a screenshot because I dont want ppl all over the world making fun of my poor PC :D

Happy benchmarking! :toast:

PS: Thanks to ajV for originally posting my mod here on XS and to Kunaak for the tips on making it cheat free!

Kunaak

02-26-2005, 08:46 PM

I can verify that this version is the the only Cheat Free PI program that I know of.
I tested it as much as possible, and theres little to no cheats possible on this version.
hopefully we don't get some dumb programmer trying to cheat on this version, like we did with CPUZ 1.26...

zakelwe

02-27-2005, 04:47 AM

Looking very good for anti cheat, this and the enhanced timing puts superpi back up there IMO.

Regards

Andy

detonator

02-27-2005, 07:45 AM

wooo tnx m8 this is a cool program!!!!

detonator

02-27-2005, 08:18 AM

I made few test, on a prescot 3200@3600 (second pc)
classic superpii I score 35.890 process timer cheak
with the new anti cheat i score 36.493...
and Im not the unic, on a italian forum few peeps found the same problem...
any idea?

snq

02-27-2005, 08:31 AM

This version is based on original unpatched Super Pi 1.1E.
The code I added only uses CPU time every now and then and totals to no more than say 2-300 instructions over a whole run, so the results should be exactly the same as with the original, or maybe 1 msec slower if you're really unlucky and cross a msec boundary during those 2-300 instructions ;)
What version are you guys using (url please)? Maybe I based my mod on the wrong version :/

detonator

02-27-2005, 11:39 AM

well here in italy im not the unic, we opend a topic about this new Super pii and they all have the same problem....is give 0.800 more from the classic , personaly I use the english classic version of the superpii Pi 1.1E
if you watch here ,there are some peeps posting even screen showing different scores,I know is not english., but you can undestend:)
http://forum.hwupgrade.it/showthread.php?s=&threadid=891382

snq

02-27-2005, 12:10 PM

Thanks, I'll look into it.
I just did soime quick oc-ing and benching and I came very close to my personal record (like 100 msecs difference). The difference can be explained by that I was running a slighly lower FSB this time. At this moment I can't think of any other explanation than that you guys are comparing it to a different version. But as I said I'll look into it :)

Edit:
I compared the one you uploaded with the modded, results are in the screenie. They give identical results for me :/

krampak

02-27-2005, 12:24 PM

I gives me +0'2s difference every time in 512KB loop.

snq

02-27-2005, 12:39 PM

Detonator, I took a look at the screenshot in the thread you posted (this one) (http://forum.hwupgrade.it/showthread.php?s=&threadid=891382)
and I think the difference there was at most 0.3 secs. If you look at the results in the right the final time has to be a very high 35. So the results are not off that much. Also I seriously doubt that processtimer can give more accurate times than Super PI itself. I haven't tried it out tho but theoretically it's just impossible.

If you could test with this version (http://www.radeonx.com/super_pi_mod_old.zip). That's the old modded one, the actual time measuring hasn't been changed only displaying it has been changed in that one. And please compare it to both this new one and the results you get with processtimer. The results in that version *are* completely accurate with the original Super PI. The original Super PI records the time in msecs but just doesn't display them.

Let me know what you find out.. Preferably a screenie with the 3 of them run right after each other. Thanks :) This is impossible to test for me as I get the exact same results for every version.

Krampak: What are you comparing to?

D_o_S

02-27-2005, 12:49 PM

I get varying results, for example on 64K I get a variation of about half a second.

And for 1M, I get a variation of about 1 sec.

snq

02-27-2005, 12:52 PM

Half a second on 64k? Uhh..
Could you check with this version (http://www.radeonx.com/super_pi_mod_old.zip) and see what kind of results you get? I'm starting to doubt my timing code works flawlessly on all systems..

HARDCORECLOCKER

02-27-2005, 12:57 PM

:D Excellent work - always got 25sec as best but now I now I'm very close to 24.........:

http://img149.exs.cx/img149/5808/252652xp.jpg

So if I'll get back my DFI NF4 some day from RMA we will see...........

:toast:

detonator

02-27-2005, 01:37 PM

this wath I have...
http://www.hotel-principe-versilia.com/public/fileupload/store/superrpii.jpg

snq

02-27-2005, 01:57 PM

Hmm..
Is the 35 sec the result from this run or from a previous run?
I have to agree tho the timings seem to be off on your system, looking at your 16K score. My system (XP3200+) does 16K in 0.219s. But... As the time with the orignal mod is over 35 secs as well I think the problem is with your system, not with my code. The new one which has more code for timing is even faster on your sys than the one with original timing.
I really don't know what to do about it.. But the results in left top cannot possibly be wrong, unless they are wrong in the original super pi.

detonator

02-27-2005, 02:40 PM

is not just me, if you cheak on the link I posted ,almoust all the pepes over there had the same problem, a different btwin 0.700/800 msm
those test were made on a 3200 prescot D0 on abit ic7max 1024 ram.did you try your super pi on an intell sistem?

HARDCORECLOCKER

02-27-2005, 03:20 PM

:D I love it - here comes the naked truth - no more cheating..... :toast:

snq

02-27-2005, 03:26 PM

I haven't tested with an Intel system no, I'll test it on my P4 2.8 but I doubt the results will make any difference.
It still is just as impossible to get wrong results. I've been thinking about it. The anti cheating code I added actually prevents wrong times from happening.

I've used babelfish now to translate the thread for me..
XstasY (you I assume?) wrote:
"on the classic superpii I make 35,890 controlato from process timer, on the new one I make 36,498.."
ProcessTimer is far less inaccurate than Super PI itself. It can in no way tell with the same amount of accuracy when the calculating process is started or stopped. Basically it lags. Of course it will lag both when starting and when stopping so you might think it'll equal out in the end. But when calculating is started, all cpu power goes to super pi so it will lag more. It will notice faster that the process was stopped, so it will give a better result than you have actually achieved.

Next, Robbi16v.
"Normal SuperPI: 53s
SuperPI mod: 53,860s"
That's a correct result.

Next, Mo3bius
From looking at the screenshot I'd say results are off by max 0.3 secs. But look at all the crap he has on his setup and what he's running (the toolbar for example)! I wouldn't expect any stable results from that setup, with or without mods.

Next, Jok3r88
super devout: 34 sec (whatever devout means ;)
super devout mod: 34.857 sec
Results match.

The rest of the posts I cannot make any sense of because babelfish apparently isn't very good at Italian ;)

But.. I suspect that if you'd run the modded program on a clean install and close anything that might affect the time (including explorer, mirc, etc) you will get roughly the same times.

I know for a fact that my code doesn't cause this so the problem must be somewhere else. I'm sorry, I dont wanna sound like an :banana::banana::banana: but there can't possibly be anything wrong with the code. My code is only used 20 times during one run. Even if it would be slow as hell, it would not give a raise of even 0.1 sec. The better results you or others may have had before were either caused by inaccuracy or plain luck.

Now I'm off to test with the P4, lets hope it wont make me eat my words ;)

detonator

02-27-2005, 04:01 PM

e second italian forum where few peeps got the same problem....
I hope you get a rid of it.
http://www.memoryextreme.it/viewtopic.php?t=1456
greating:)

detonator

02-27-2005, 04:13 PM

btw those test made in the italian forums are made with the proces timer, they all say the same, a different of 0.800 like I told you before.
I want just to help you out ,becosue wuld be a must to have a spii with msm:)
and my own test are made on a clean istallation no twick at all, fresh Xp istallation.

snq

02-27-2005, 04:15 PM

I just finished testing on my P4 2.8. 512 MB PC333, pretty fresh XP SP2 install. It's a Dell ;)
First I tested regular Super PI, result was 53 secs
Next I tested mine, result was 53.641 secs
It seemed the first test would've been a low 53 tho (some of the times in between were faster), so I tested again. This time I got the same second values for all of them as I got in mine.

I can't do anything about this. My version uses the exact same amount of memory as the original, uses the exact same code for calculating, the only difference is that when time is taken (20 times per run) it will cost a few more clockcycles. And believe me that will not cause a change of even 10 msecs over a whole run.
The error must be in italian PCs or software because I just cannot get it to make a difference here no matter how many times I try :)

Also please don't rely on ProcessTimer when comparing results. It might be good for seeing the differences between different memory timings and clock settings but it does not give an accurate time. Mine shows the actual time it took to calculate the digits, plus or minus around 15 msecs depending on your timer resolution (depends on OS).

snq

02-27-2005, 04:21 PM

I understand your frustration tho so I'll keep testing and thinking about it and hopefully I'll find an explanation for it. It's just too weird. I still believe its impossible that the little code I added could have anything to do with it.

NiCKE^

02-27-2005, 04:32 PM

Compare a modded super pi and a unmodded superpi times with process timer and see if modded super pi and process timer shows diffrently?

snq

02-27-2005, 04:35 PM

AHA!
I just figured something out.
To make a long and boring story short, the problem might be memory related. This is the only thing that has been changed for all of the code. It might be the case that on Intel systems this slows down everything a bit. Actually it MUST be that because if not then I really don't know ;)
I'll try and whip up a new version tonight so we can see if it makes a difference.

NiCKE^

02-27-2005, 04:41 PM

Sounds good to me :D

krampak

02-27-2005, 04:41 PM

Now is doing good for me :)

http://genetics.intercomgi.com/krampak/PC/pis.JPG

Highland3r

02-27-2005, 05:04 PM

Nice work :) mirrored (http://www.drunken-student.co.uk/dl/super_pi_mod.zip)

Ref

02-27-2005, 05:06 PM

Great work :toast:
Waiting for the next WR in SuperPI to be done with this nice mod ;)

snq

02-27-2005, 05:31 PM

Anyone with speed problems feel like testing?
http://www.radeonx.com/super_pi_mod_test.zip

detonator

02-28-2005, 06:39 AM

Anyone with speed problems feel like testing?
http://www.radeonx.com/super_pi_mod_test.zip

is getting better:
http://www.hotel-principe-versilia.com/public/fileupload/store/Spii.jpg

Northwood

02-28-2005, 07:36 AM

*ahem*

http://images5.theimagehosting.com/SPI.JPG (http://www.theimagehosting.com)

snq

02-28-2005, 11:43 AM

Okay.. Shot of actual run please :)

fireblade

02-28-2005, 12:28 PM

*ahem*

http://images5.theimagehosting.com/SPI.JPG (http://www.theimagehosting.com)
not bad at all :D :p:

HARDCORECLOCKER

02-28-2005, 02:11 PM

*ahem*

http://images5.theimagehosting.com/SPI.JPG (http://www.theimagehosting.com)

:D Nice photoshop - great artist........... :toast:

MaSell

03-02-2005, 09:17 AM

paint overclocker :D

Sup3rman

03-02-2005, 01:11 PM

Nice SuperPi mod

cpulloverclock

03-02-2005, 01:59 PM

my best with my winchester

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/26s.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/26s..gif

bachus_anonym

03-02-2005, 02:02 PM

:D Nice photoshop - great artist........... :toast:
You don't even have to use Paint for that... Just manually edit results.txt file ;)

cpulloverclock

03-02-2005, 02:03 PM

hey, it's me or everybody, [IMG] code is off

bachus_anonym

03-02-2005, 02:06 PM

hey, it's me or everybody, [IMG] code is off
OT... but look here ---> http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=54689

HARDCORECLOCKER

03-02-2005, 02:06 PM

hey, it's me or everybody, [IMG] code is off

:cool: Yep - there's still running a poll if XS shuold do that caused by the attack of a bad bird. Posted an invalid code which killed IE on XS and it came with the HTML code.

Though the poll is still running seems that HTML is shut off already.... :toast:

|SiLA|

03-02-2005, 08:00 PM

:cool: Yep - there's still running a poll if XS shuold do that caused by the attack of a bad bird. Posted an invalid code which killed IE on XS and it came with the HTML code.

Though the poll is still running seems that HTML is shut off already.... :toast:

now i know why my IE crashed many times when i was trying to look at ati's event pics :D

speedstream5621

03-02-2005, 08:09 PM

Unmodded version --->36sec.
Original mod--->38sec.
Mod #2--->37sec.

What gives?

snq

03-02-2005, 09:04 PM

Not sure really...
The weird thing is it only seems to be slower on some systems. On my own systems it's just as fast as the unmodded one :/
Anyway, I'm working on some new stuff which will completely ban cheating and I restarted from scratch using a slightly different approach so maybe this will help. I won't have it done until at least tomorrow tho so check back later, I'll post when I got a new version :)

speedstream5621

03-02-2005, 10:23 PM

I have Windows 2000 with SP4 if that matters at all. Perhaps some of the changes affect 2K more than XP?

snq

03-03-2005, 02:53 AM

I do most of my runs on win2000 as well, no SP4 tho. But it doesn't make any difference for me :/
Anyway the new version should be ready later today or tomorrow and I started out with an unmodded superpi. I'm hoping this will solve the problems some people have had.
New features will be even more precise timing, now really down to the msec no more 15 msec jumps. A checksum will be added so screenies can be authenticated, and the results are stored in an encrypted format so nobody can edit the results file and get 1M in 15.250s :D

snq

03-03-2005, 08:26 PM

http://superpi.radeonx.com/

Extra accurate timing now! :)
http://img114.exs.cx/img114/2082/superpi26hv.gif

Nevermind the time I'm running on 1.5V now ;)
http://img94.exs.cx/img94/633/superpi8ny.gif

Kunaak

03-03-2005, 09:24 PM

Parse error: parse error, unexpected T_STRING in /home/nico/domains/radeonx.com/public_html/superpi/super_pi_mod.zip on line 225

Millyons

03-04-2005, 05:04 AM

same here can't dl it

snq

03-04-2005, 09:09 AM

Daah.. Sorry about that, it works now.
I was tired ;)

NiCKE^

03-04-2005, 09:39 AM

Here is another mirror (http://home.no/trac3r/super_pi_mod.zip)

snq

03-04-2005, 09:40 AM

Thanks, I'll add it to the dl page if thats okay :)

Millyons

03-04-2005, 10:07 AM

thanks

Vapor

03-04-2005, 10:08 AM

Since I'm the first to post this, IDK if it's just my computer or if it's the mod, but it seems buggy...I'm getting results in the negative 2 minutes for the last few intervals, and some positive 1200 hrs for the total...yet it only takes about a minute in actuallity (timed with a stopwatch or with the unmodded version). Then it crashes when I press OK.

Running a kinda old system with a buncha open apps and some very bad (error laden) RAM, maybe that's why?

snq

03-04-2005, 10:12 AM

How old is your system? And what version of Windows are you running?
The anti cheat stuff *might* make it crash under certain circumstances if you have a slow machine. I might have an idea as for why it crashes but if you can give me some more info I can be sure :)

Edit: I just tested on a celeron 766 and it went fine so slow should be *really* slow. But I'm guessing it's related to the windows version.

Beat_Slayer

03-04-2005, 11:38 AM

I'm using winxp + sp2 + automatic updates!

System on sig!

snq

03-04-2005, 11:45 AM

Thanks for that.
I'll see what I can do. It might actually be the PC being too fast in your case ;)
Sigh.. My own PCs are too good, everything always works :D

Jah_Warrior

03-04-2005, 12:03 PM

Great work on this new Pi-mod, Thankyou :toast:

Vapor

03-04-2005, 12:29 PM

Mine's only two years old, so not really that old (P4B 3.06, 1GB RDRAM PC1066, IWill P4R533-N). Anyway, I have the same exact problem as Beat Slayer. I'm using WinXP SP1a.

snq

03-04-2005, 12:30 PM

For the ppl with problems, I uploaded a new version.
http://superpi.radeonx.com/super_pi_mod.zip

Please let me know if it works :)

NiCKE^

03-04-2005, 12:45 PM

Sure snq, I've uploaded the new version now.

snq

03-04-2005, 12:48 PM

Man tackar :)

Anyone with a cpu running at around 3GHz or higher tested yet? :)

Highland3r

03-05-2005, 10:47 AM

Great work SNQ new version works great :)
UK mirror if u want it :) http://www.drunken-student.co.uk/dl/super_pi_mod.zip

snq

03-05-2005, 10:54 AM

Thanks Highland3r :)
Added your mirror to the download locations. Appreciated :D

bachus_anonym

03-05-2005, 11:29 AM

@snq

Are you sure that Online Validation workes... ? I just typed in three checksums and all of them come up as "Incorrect checksum" :(

snq

03-05-2005, 11:34 AM

Yea it works.

I actually checked the screenies you posted in the 'competition with OPB' thread (not because I dont believe you but because I wanted to see if it actually worked ;)) and they worked.

Can you give me the details of the ones you're trying to verify? It's not completely impossible something is wrong, but so far everything I've tested is right and I must've tested at least 50 different times/checksums by now.

BTW I hope you do realize you have to enter both the time and the checksum, not just the checksum :D

alexio

03-05-2005, 12:16 PM

Where can I get the source for super pi?, I've been looking for it for a while now.

snq

03-05-2005, 12:37 PM

There is no source. This mod was done with a hex editor and some asm tools.

No, I'm not kidding :)

bachus_anonym

03-05-2005, 12:37 PM

BTW I hope you do realize you have to enter both the time and the checksum, not just the checksum :D
:brick: guess what??? I didn't :brick: thanks for clarifying that ;)

EDIT: BTW, GREAT MOD !!! Thanx :thumbsup:

snq

03-05-2005, 12:48 PM

:brick: guess what??? I didn't :brick: thanks for clarifying that ;)

EDIT: BTW, GREAT MOD !!! Thanx :thumbsup:
As you could see I added a line with instructions to the page now, that should clear up any confusion :D
Thanks for the thumbs up :cool:

alexio

03-05-2005, 12:54 PM

There is no source. This mod was done with a hex editor and some asm tools.

No, I'm not kidding :)

Very nice, that must have been quite allot of work then.

Do you have the exact formula for calculating Pi in a text file that I can just copy->past, the method that Super Pi uses to calculate PI that is.

I might want to build a new program from the ground but I'm not so good in mathematics that I can just convert a formula in a way a C++ compiler understands.

On the other hand, Super PI is actually a peace of crap if you look at the time it takes to calculate Pi.

Ofcourse I understand that it has become a standard in benchmarking, but wouldn't it be nice if there was a more efficient program for calculating PI?

QuickPi for example calculates PI far faster than Super Pi but I just don't like the program. So wouldn't it be nice if I could just implement the formula of quickPI in Super Pi and make the program allot faster wile keeping the nice layout.

I might email the author of super PI and ask for the source, does anyone has his email?

Andrewv

03-05-2005, 12:58 PM

nice mod but it sux :\

Not modded: 48sec
Modded: 49.375sec

snq

03-05-2005, 01:07 PM

Sorry, I don't have that. I guess with a lot of time and effort it would be possible to rip out all the necessary code but it's nearly impossible. For example all addresses used would need to be changed, not quite a fun task.. It would be a lot easier to take some opensource PI code and use that. There's lots of code available but as SuperPI is kind of the standard when it comes to PI benching I just added some features that were missing :)

The latest superpi version was released about 10 years ago (august 95) so even the original author might not have the source any more.
Anyway on http://pi2.cc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ you can find some more info.

snq

03-05-2005, 01:10 PM

nice mod but it sux :\

Not modded: 48sec
Modded: 49.375sec
Try running it a couple of times more. Most likely the 48sec was a high 48 and your cpu got occupied with something else while running the modded one. 0.4 secs difference isn't the whole world, just do a few more runs with both :)

Beat_Slayer

03-05-2005, 01:41 PM

Works flawlessly now!

Good work! :toast:

snq

03-05-2005, 02:18 PM

That's good to hear :)

So.. does anyone have any more ideas for new features? I'm kinda bored :D

scsim

03-06-2005, 07:38 AM

Hi! I am facing some strange issues. When I OC my P4 3.0E to 4.3GHz, Super PI will post crazy results. At 4.289GHz, my result is 31.562sec. When I bump my FSB 1 MHz higher, the results became 1hr 51min. Of course, it doesn't take that long to complete (slightly more than 30sec). Just that the time shown for each iteration is wrong.

I used to face this issue when WinXP couldn't detect anything more than 4.3GHz problerly. SP2 seems to solve that problem but it appears that no all programs are working. Any work around?

Thanks!

bachus_anonym

03-06-2005, 09:45 AM

@snq

I've just seen some CRAAAZZYYY time in SuperPi 16M with the latest MOD. Checksum turnes out OK :confused: Something that might be similar to above post... Just look for yourself, bud:

11:30 - P4 3.0EGHz @4501MHz (15x300) (http://www.sneerstudio.com/11-30.gif)

09:06 - P4 530 3GHz @ 3890MHz (15x259) (http://img174.exs.cx/img174/4137/16mforrapra3vz.jpg)

The author of that first score says that he was not cheating and numerous runs show pretty much same results...

Something must be wrong with that MOD. Can you take a look at it, please ?

snq

03-06-2005, 01:05 PM

bachus_anonym

03-06-2005, 01:09 PM

Hmm.. that's odd.
An explanation could be that your timers are off at such high clocks. I still use windows timing functions in this version, but I believe this timer relies on clock speed and afaik it's calibrated at boot time. Now I'm not sure exactly how this is done but it could be that sometimes (?) the timer is not recalibrated when you change the clockspeed using clockgen or some other tool?
Obviously it's a problem tho, I'll see what I can do about it! I just hope I don't have to fall back on the old 15-msec-jump-timing :/
Well, this person says that with Original SuperPI he gets around 14:00, which is about right... So you might wanna try to poke around and see what could be the problem.... And I think so far this happened only on Intel / Prescott...

snq

03-06-2005, 01:15 PM

The problem is I changed the function used to get the time, so the problem has to be there. This is really bad news because I really loved this new function without the weird jumps. But if it's acting like this it will have to go :(

Unfortunately I don't have a prescott to test with but I will try starting with a heavily underclocked system and throw up the FSB while in windows, that should show me if this function adjusts properly or not.

snq

03-06-2005, 01:20 PM

I don't know anything about clocking Intel CPUs but do those things support HT and if so do you have it enabled?

If so that could be causing the problem.

On a multiprocessor computer, it should not matter which processor is called. However, you can get different results on different processors due to bugs in the basic input/output system (BIOS) or the hardware abstraction layer (HAL). To specify processor affinity for a thread, use the SetThreadAffinityMask function.

snq

03-06-2005, 02:24 PM

Can you guys test this one (http://superpi.radeonx.com/super_pi_mod-1.4.zip)?
It has the old timing functions, still msecs but with small jumps. I guess for calculating 16M/32M 15 msecs more or less wont be a big deal ;)

scsim

03-06-2005, 04:25 PM

Thanks, the new version is working properly now. My CPU is running at 4.35GHz instead of 4.305GHz, thus its no longer 1hr 51m, but

http://home.no/trac3r/super_pi_mod.zip

I downloaded from this mirror above and I gotten:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v51/ISS8634/SP1.gif

After downloading the 1.4:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v51/ISS8634/SP2.gif

Its working! Thanks!

Sucka

03-06-2005, 06:46 PM

Good work on the PI updates. Now once everyone can use SSE3 we won't have anything to complain about :p

bachus_anonym

03-06-2005, 06:56 PM

thanks snq,

I posted this information along with a new link on my native forums... I will let you know how it worked out ;)

snq

03-06-2005, 09:03 PM

Its working! Thanks!
Great :) I still want the really precise timing back tho. I'm thinking of what I could do to work around this problem. On my own system(s) the amount I clock doesn't affect the timer but I guess windows or the bios freaks out at that speed :(

ArcTan

03-06-2005, 09:14 PM

hmm
doesn't seem to work with clockgen(nf3 one)?
It gives out the same time as the speeds in which I boot at

snq

03-06-2005, 09:21 PM

ArcTan, that's what I was afraid of. The timer is not reinitialized :(
Try this one: http://superpi.radeonx.com/super_pi_mod-1.4.zip

ArcTan

03-06-2005, 09:48 PM

thanks
works now

Sons_of_Piru

03-07-2005, 02:47 AM

impresive reverse engineering work, good job :toast:

snq

03-07-2005, 02:55 AM

Thanks Sons of Piru :D

kiko

03-09-2005, 04:49 AM

same settings. :/

http://xoomer.virgilio.it/kikoguru/img/32sec.png

http://xoomer.virgilio.it/kikoguru/img/32val.png

Ciao

detonator

03-10-2005, 05:42 AM

same the guys abouve, my ptime is still 0.500msm differetn from the originall....
anti cheat=35.629
originall=35.140....
inprouved but still wrong:)

TEDY

03-10-2005, 06:06 AM

what is NOT EXACT IN ROUND ?

280*9....prime stable and superpi not ?

works now with 1.4 :)

eva2000

03-12-2005, 07:11 AM

didn't know you had a new version out heh but here's what i managed

max pifast and superpi 1M able

http://fileshosts.com/AMD/MSI/K8N_NEO2/3500_CAA2C_0505_APMW/Kingston/KHX3200K2/2x256/17_3/LDT3x/265-265-2226-7-12-2211-1T-1.77-3.6-1.65/superpi-1m_tn.jpg

http://fileshosts.com/AMD/MSI/K8N_NEO2/3500_CAA2C_0505_APMW/Kingston/KHX3200K2/2x256/17_3/LDT3x/265-265-2226-7-12-2211-1T-1.77-3.6-1.65/superpi-2m_tn.jpg

http://fileshosts.com/AMD/MSI/K8N_NEO2/3500_CAA2C_0505_APMW/Kingston/KHX3200K2/2x256/17_3/LDT3x/265-265-2226-7-12-2211-1T-1.77-3.6-1.65/superpi-1m_SSE2_tn.jpg

http://fileshosts.com/AMD/MSI/K8N_NEO2/3500_CAA2C_0505_APMW/Kingston/KHX3200K2/2x256/17_3/LDT3x/265-265-2226-7-12-2211-1T-1.77-3.6-1.65/superpi-2m_SSE2_tn.jpg

kiko

03-17-2005, 02:20 AM

small improvement w/ previous version. :)

http://xoomer.virgilio.it/kikoguru/img/32.764.png

Ciao

mcnbns

03-20-2005, 07:29 AM

Thank you, SNQ! I might do some old school Athlon XP benching and see if I can't beat my old 36s record. :toast:

03-20-2005, 10:35 AM

http://www.cool-cooler-the-coolest.de/Galleries/Screenshot/images/pi-rekord-tag.JPG (http://www.cool-cooler-the-coolest.de/Galleries/Screenshot/images/big/pi-rekord-tag.JPG)
Click on the pic to get the highres version!

What do you think?

fordf250

03-28-2005, 11:01 AM

Dfi 875p-t with intel 640 on air

wwwww

04-01-2005, 12:10 AM

same settings. :/

http://xoomer.virgilio.it/kikoguru/img/32sec.png

http://xoomer.virgilio.it/kikoguru/img/32val.png

Ciao

why doesnt it say the cpuz checksum? i have that prob on my dothan as well and on 6** cpus.

well heres my score

http://users.tpg.com.au/weigner/23.png

dothy 745 @ 2.78Ghz (173*16) 1.68V (shoddy filo chip)
mushy black @ 288MHz 2-2-2-5; 4.1V
the dfi 855 board

cpulloverclock

04-01-2005, 12:19 AM

23.5s at 2.78 is weird

a fake?

where is the cpu-z with your time :rolleyes:

try again with a frequency cpu and ram proof

wwwww

04-01-2005, 04:40 AM

23.5s at 2.78 is weird

a fake?

where is the cpu-z with your time :rolleyes:

try again with a frequency cpu and ram proof

how could you fake that?

i had another similar score with the older superpi with cpuz and friends open- at 4.1V on the vdimm i just want to screenshot, save and shut down. doesnt seem so wierd. a friend of mine has his chip at 2.8Ghz 25sec with kingston value ram (some shoddy micron chip i think).

bachus_anonym

04-01-2005, 10:50 AM

Not that it's fake but I'm 100% it's bugged result.
If original and modded versions are exactly same as far as calculation algorithm (which they are) then how can you claim it's OK score?

With original SPi you get 32s @ 17x155=2642MHz
Modded SPi you show 23.547 @ 16x173=2768MHz

You'd better report it to snq with all the circumstances of that run so he can fix it ;)

NiCKE^

04-01-2005, 12:29 PM

You got it hosted again here (http://home.no/trac3r/super_pi_mod-1.4.zip), but you'll have to tell me when you got a new version out :D

wwwww

04-01-2005, 07:34 PM

bachus_anonym

04-01-2005, 07:35 PM

the other had the ram at the 1:1 2-2-2-5; this is at 3:5
either way, impossible :(

wwwww

04-01-2005, 07:45 PM

either way, impossible :(

well if its a bug it still looks pretty ****ing good :D

cpulloverclock

04-03-2005, 01:32 PM

3000+, awesome no? :)

28.999s is not far at 2813MHz

:banana:

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/28......gif

Mrki

04-16-2005, 08:50 AM

my lovely winni :)

http://mitglied.lycos.de/siedl/9x346.jpg

NiCKE^

04-16-2005, 09:16 AM

Oh that's nice! Phase change I presume?

Mrki

04-20-2005, 01:55 AM

Oh that's nice! Phase change I presume?

yes ... i will test with server 2003 ;)

05-03-2005, 08:36 AM

25,922s --- c³- A64 FX-55 @ 3.324 Mhz (1,766Vc) / FSB 277MHz (CL 2/2/2/5)

http://www.cool-cooler-the-coolest.de/Galleries/Screenshot/images/pi-3,324-25,9222sek.JPG (http://www.cool-cooler-the-coolest.de/Galleries/Screenshot/images/big/pi-3,324-25,9222sek.JPG)
For a HighRes version please click on the pic!

EQuito

05-03-2005, 11:08 AM

Well done snq! thank you! :toast:

one Q though: sometimes I can pass the 1M test with the regular version but not with yours and something very strange, your version gives me better scores at lower clocks... :confused:

On the San Diego OC thread I got up to 3271MHz with a score of 27s (regular version) and now I get 26s+ @ 3190MHz with this version, any ideas?

joe_cool

05-05-2005, 02:22 PM

My San Diego 3700+ :D

http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/data/500/143891M3263_02.gif

joe_cool :toast:

05-06-2005, 04:53 AM

25,203s --- c³- A64 FX-55 @ 3.342 Mhz (1,808Vc) / FSB 278MHz (CL 2/2/2/5)

http://www.cool-cooler-the-coolest.de/Galleries/Screenshot/images/pi-3,324-25,203sek.JPG (http://www.cool-cooler-the-coolest.de/Galleries/Screenshot/images/big/pi-3,324-25,203sek.JPG)

Epsilon

05-07-2005, 02:20 PM

My 3700+ Clawhammer @ Dry-ice :)

http://members.home.nl/epsilon/temp/spi_26922_3306_275.JPG

And 8M :)

http://members.home.nl/epsilon/temp/spi8m_512375_3281_273.JPG

The topic with info etc

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=851907

Athens[2004]

05-08-2005, 08:26 PM

http://img136.echo.cx/img136/8982/pi290qq.jpg (http://www.imageshack.us)

charlie

05-08-2005, 08:41 PM

here's my best:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=30060

t-max

05-11-2005, 04:56 AM

My sandy 3700+ does 24 sek with the orig. one i will try this 14modded version this evning. at 3372 mhz

blander

05-12-2005, 11:45 AM

my xp-m 2600+ @ abit nf7 :eek:

http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/data/500/613434_459.JPG

ewitte

05-15-2005, 05:18 AM

Does anyone have a good DL for the SSE3/Prescott version? I've found 3 ~15kb downloads that all said corrupt. With this version I do have a 26m09s 32MB screenshot with CPU-Z :)

Eric

eva2000

05-22-2005, 08:03 AM

Does anyone have a good DL for the SSE3/Prescott version? I've found 3 ~15kb downloads that all said corrupt. With this version I do have a 26m09s 32MB screenshot with CPU-Z :)

Eric
it's available at http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?t=327

btw, my fastest 32M time so far

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/4000_CABHE_0515_SPMW/OCZ/PC3200Gold/LDT4x/11x/253-253-2226-7-14-2212-1.67-1.5-1.6-3.5_3120_ds3dds1/superpi-32m_tn.jpg

vanovich

05-24-2005, 02:57 PM

death metal

05-24-2005, 03:53 PM

hmm... i can find the web site anymore :(...anyone knows why it's down or where it went to (if it has moved?)? thanks...

eva2000

05-26-2005, 05:30 AM

any care to redo the latest version with smaller text like the first modded one ?

coop

05-29-2005, 10:22 AM

deleted for later post

charlie

06-03-2005, 10:24 PM

pentium M rock.... same spi 1M as my SD @ 3100mHz++

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=31874

Pedro Rocha

06-04-2005, 07:25 AM

Here is some quick test with a 0512XPMW SanDiego +, in a silent Vapo LS (fans at 30%), VDimm jumper at 3.2v so moderate speed on the Redlines :)

3.360mhz SuperPI:
http://pedrorocha.planetaclix.pt/SD4000_3350mhz.jpg

Not bad ;)

charlie

06-04-2005, 09:06 PM

Sorry Pedro, my 3gHz Dothan takes ya'

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=31921

[XC] moddolicous

06-04-2005, 09:21 PM

R U gonna put that CPU under LN2?? With your insane pair of Redline, you should be able to make some really nice superpi times, maybe break the record with 18's!

charlie

06-04-2005, 09:46 PM

Dothan show no love for Redlines :(
Just an incompatibility, I guess.

C

Pedro Rocha

06-05-2005, 02:59 PM

Sorry Pedro, my 3gHz Dothan takes ya'

I know that our venerated 3D Team Captain :D

These little and unexpessive CPU's really impress me, I may try one of these somedy..

What are you unsing to cool that thing ???

charlie

06-05-2005, 03:01 PM

that's with the chilly1 autocascade, but the contact is really BAD, with above 0C temps....

And yeah, you certainly need to perform some of that "portugal Magic" to a Dothan, as you guys have done so often...

C

matrs

06-07-2005, 09:39 PM

a stupid question, but...... in super pi, the M=mega? o M=million?, i remember have read sometime that M= million, then now I doubt.......

coop

06-09-2005, 11:12 PM

ice water sd http://img29.echo.cx/img29/9812/sd1m26lwst2ag.jpg (http://www.imageshack.us)

eva2000

06-15-2005, 12:28 PM

yay broke my personal best 16M and 32M times

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/3000_0516_GPAW_2/Gskill/PC4400LE/2x512/799_800/LDT3x/NF4_1/320-288-2.5336-9-18-2222-1.67-1.4-1.7-2.87_0648_ds8dds1_9ns_6ns/superpi-16m_twk_tn.jpg

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/3000_0516_GPAW_2/Gskill/PC4400LE/2x512/799_800/LDT3x/NF4_1/320-288-2.5336-9-18-3223-1.67-1.4-1.7-2.87_0648_ds8dds1_9ns_65ns/superpi-32m_tn.jpg

hawtrawkr

06-16-2005, 06:49 AM

i need to get a dothan to play with.

http://www.vgnetwork.com/plyrimages/2384/1m%20superpi.jpg

sorry for the messy desktop and size.

this was with a p4 660 and a stock vapochill ls

eva2000

06-16-2005, 11:35 AM

well crushed my personal best 16M and 32M times again :D

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/3000_0516_GPAW_2/Gskill/PC4400LE/2x512/799_800/LDT3x/NF4_1/510-2/322-289-2.5336-8-18-2222-1.67-1.4-1.7-2.87_0648_ds8dds1_9ns_N_6ns/superpi-16m_tn.jpg

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/3000_0516_GPAW_2/Gskill/PC4400LE/2x512/799_800/LDT3x/NF4_1/510-2/322-289-2.5337-9-22-3223-1.68-1.4-1.7-2.87_0648_ds8dds1_9ns_F_65ns_4x4x/superpi-32_tn.jpg

coop

06-18-2005, 09:36 PM

http://img239.echo.cx/img239/3125/32mxtwk6cb.jpg

C_B

06-19-2005, 03:59 AM

coop

06-19-2005, 06:46 PM

updated: water cooled http://img58.echo.cx/img58/1343/1mfpi31008lz.jpg (http://www.imageshack.us)

freestylercs

06-27-2005, 08:14 AM

Here s mine 3700+ San Diego 0511 WPMW watercooled:

1M

http://mitglied.lycos.de/freestylercs/hpbimg/3700+%201M.JPG

32M

http://mitglied.lycos.de/freestylercs/hpbimg/32m%20300x10.JPG

free

HARDCORECLOCKER

07-14-2005, 05:55 AM

:D O.K. - Mr. Dothan is a nice one but not the only:

http://img295.echo.cx/img295/2509/3576mhz4ur.jpg

:toast:

cpulloverclock

07-17-2005, 01:38 PM

I have 26.1 at 3093MHz with 281 1:1

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/3138.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/3142.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/4.49.gif

cpulloverclock

07-18-2005, 01:15 PM

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/25.812.gif

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/4.47.gif

eva2000

07-22-2005, 11:57 AM

11x274HTT = 3014 at 1.39v
2x512MB Gskill PC4400LE @274mhz 2.5-3-3-7 1T

1M = 27.563 (http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/G4Storm/Gskill/PC4400LE/2x512/799_800/5102_FIX/LDT3x/11x/274-274-2.5337-7-17-2222_1.41-1.3-1.6-2.84_3072_ds8dds1_7F5/superpi-1m_tn.jpg)s
2M = 1min 03.094 (http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/G4Storm/Gskill/PC4400LE/2x512/799_800/5102_FIX/LDT3x/11x/274-274-2.5337-7-17-2222_1.41-1.3-1.6-2.84_3072_ds8dds1_7F5/superpi-2m_tn.jpg)s
4M = 2min 18.516 (http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/G4Storm/Gskill/PC4400LE/2x512/799_800/5102_FIX/LDT3x/11x/274-274-2.5337-7-17-2222_1.41-1.3-1.6-2.84_3072_ds8dds1_7F5/superpi-4m_tn.jpg)s
8M = 5min 02.672 (http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/G4Storm/Gskill/PC4400LE/2x512/799_800/5102_FIX/LDT3x/11x/274-274-2.5337-7-17-2222_1.41-1.3-1.6-2.84_3072_ds8dds1_7F5/superpi-8m_tn.jpg)s
16M = 11min 08.766 (http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/G4Storm/Gskill/PC4400LE/2x512/799_800/5102_FIX/LDT3x/11x/274-274-2.5337-7-17-2222_1.41-1.3-1.6-2.84_3072_ds8dds1_7F5/superpi-16m_tn.jpg)s
32M = 24min 07.454 (http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/FX57/G4Storm/Gskill/PC4400LE/2x512/799_800/5102_FIX/LDT3x/11x/274-274-2.5337-7-17-2222_1.41-1.3-1.6-2.84_3072_ds8dds1_7F5/superpi-32m_twk_tn.jpg)s

.

cpulloverclock

07-22-2005, 02:18 PM

k|ngp|n

07-25-2005, 04:26 PM

why oh why won't this 780es run high fsb over 3200mhz..... This thing would f'ing fly on the p4c800-e with max ghz + high fsb:
http://pic8.picturetrail.com/VOL256/1324330/7247576/105881687.jpg

cpulloverclock

07-26-2005, 12:53 PM

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/2.10.015.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/25.312.gif

[XC] moddolicous

07-26-2005, 06:21 PM

Was that mem @ 306 2-2-2-5 for that run cpulloverclock? Nice scores.

cpulloverclock

07-26-2005, 09:13 PM

Was that mem @ 306 2-2-2-5 for that run cpulloverclock? Nice scores.
asynch mode :)

mem at 268-270

[XC] moddolicous

07-27-2005, 09:26 AM

asynch mode :)

mem at 268-270
alrite, I know what u mean now. I wanna see under 20's soon from you. :slobber:

cpulloverclock

07-27-2005, 10:11 AM

alrite, I know what u mean now. I wanna see under 20's soon from you. :slobber:
ouch, sub 20s will be hard

20.XXX is possible if I have no prob with my mem

zytrahus

07-27-2005, 10:17 AM

cpulloverclock
Xtreme Addict

Location: North America: Ottawa, Montreal, Miami - France -->center and south Mediterranean

bordel :d :ouch:

joe_cool

08-01-2005, 03:25 PM

My best result with FX-55 SD @ VapoLS. (waiting for better cooling) ;)

http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/data/500/14389fx_1m_3507_01.gif

RoyaL

08-01-2005, 10:05 PM

can anyone tell me how can i give more than 1,6V to this babe right here?

http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/8999/268753sw.jpg

illidan

08-07-2005, 06:25 AM

http://img348.imageshack.us/img348/4241/spi334228yw.th.jpg (http://img348.imageshack.us/my.php?image=spi334228yw.jpg)

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=31113

alexio

08-07-2005, 06:28 AM

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v342/AlexKok33/25secs.jpg

Stock air

PAT disabled

Windows XP

2-2-2-5 1:1

Z3NiTH

08-08-2005, 05:31 AM

Here's my attempt: :)
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=35512&stc=1
System:
FX55 Clawhammer
Kingston Hyper-X BH-5
DFI nF4 SLI-DR
Prometeia MachII

coop

08-08-2005, 02:30 PM

With my h20 setup and some ice

RoyaL

08-10-2005, 09:38 PM

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v342/AlexKok33/25secs.jpg

Stock air

PAT disabled

Windows XP

2-2-2-5 1:1

u can do better..
i got the same time with 100mhz less

http://img355.imageshack.us/img355/9053/259077hb.jpg

optimize everything ;)

0verl0ad

08-11-2005, 01:52 PM

Pentium-M Dotan 730 | 245x11=2703mhz @ 1,6V | 2*512MB MDT 1:1 @ 2,5-3-3-6 @ 2,75V (real ~2,7V) | P4C800 SE + CT 479 Adapter | Aircooled (default cooler)

http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/7071/274067es.th.jpg (http://img221.imageshack.us/my.php?image=274067es.jpg)

coop

08-16-2005, 09:01 PM

A cup of DI, http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/2496/256056ld.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

funkflix

08-17-2005, 05:55 AM

SuperPi 32M :

GravediggA - 24m 42.500s - A64 Venice 2915MHz - BH5 265,0MHz 2.0-2-2-5-7-13 1T

http://www.funkflix.de/pics/32m24min.jpg

SuperPi 1M :

GravediggA - 27.734s - A64 Venice 2963MHz - BH5 269,4MHz 2.0-2-2-5-7-13 1T

http://www.funkflix.de/pics/1m27sek.jpg

alexio

08-17-2005, 06:08 AM

u can do better..
i got the same time with 100mhz less

optimize everything ;)

Yeah I know. My board doesn't like PAT and it is limitting by overclock that's why I disabled it. Other tweaks would take another 0.5 secs of my time maybe.

Riverna

08-19-2005, 09:13 AM

Here is my new 3700+ upmw 0525.

http://www.stosstrupp-steiner.net/~Chris/3700er-Pr0n3.jpg

alexio

08-19-2005, 09:46 AM

Yeah I know. My board doesn't like PAT and it is limitting by overclock that's why I disabled it. Other tweaks would take another 0.5 secs of my time maybe.

Well I've tested 13*200 with full PAT versus 13*200 with no PAT at all at 2-2-2-5 settings. The difference is an unbelievable 1.2 seconds, 28.3 versus 29.5 seconds in superpi 1m. Now it is clear why my time isn't good for the clockspeed it's running at.

nachthymnen

08-28-2005, 06:42 AM

My new record.All details on screen:
http://img226.imageshack.us/img226/8403/spi2370lt.th.jpg (http://img226.imageshack.us/my.php?image=spi2370lt.jpg)

funkflix

09-06-2005, 03:12 PM

:banana: :banana:

http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/8628/26sekspi1mgrave2pw.jpg

Jupiler

09-06-2005, 03:27 PM

:banana: :banana:

]

Very nice m8. :toast:
Is that the 0517DP*W?

funkflix

09-06-2005, 03:29 PM

Thx m8. :toast:

It's 0520DP*W ;)

Edit: Ahh, u read that on hwluxx.. im slow, sry. :)

DPAW tbh.

Jupiler

09-06-2005, 03:58 PM

Very nice, p!mp|cl0cker :D

funkflix

09-06-2005, 04:41 PM

Hehe :D

A 32M run.. but not < 24m, but there is a little bit space for improvment. ;)

http://img372.imageshack.us/img372/4964/32mschit6ci.jpg

funkflix

09-12-2005, 03:30 AM

http://img355.imageshack.us/img355/5694/268s5et.jpg

[XC] moddolicous

09-21-2005, 05:22 PM

Here's my best 1mb from an A XP 2200 @ 2092
http://img274.imageshack.us/my.php?image=1mspi3bj.jpg
Next up a 32mb run

gaddster

09-28-2005, 10:23 AM

730 Dothan all air. :D

http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a49/gaddster/spi1mb.jpg

funkflix

10-29-2005, 07:51 AM

Anyone with an 512kb L2 A64 2700MHz and under 30sek 1M? Wan't to know if it's a good time. :)

http://img438.imageshack.us/img438/6015/29sec2700mhz9oh.jpg

Smy

10-29-2005, 10:45 AM

http://home.no/smy/dataromme/sp%201mb%20%20x2%202900mhz.jpg

max bench clock for now :)

nachthymnen

10-30-2005, 02:40 AM

My new record:
22.641 with FX-57 @ 3751Mhz(-34°C DryIced)
http://img496.imageshack.us/img496/9896/spi37514xd.th.jpg (http://img496.imageshack.us/my.php?image=spi37514xd.jpg)

Rubex

11-08-2005, 03:46 PM

Hi to everybody, placed my result!
Liquid cooled Trex2 5Volt

http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/1181/2950superpibonopiu6pn.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Dj Rudy

11-22-2005, 11:49 PM

DICE cooled

2x512 geil Pc 4300 @ 2.55v
P5WD2 Full mod

http://www.hwtweakers.net/files/forum/0511/1mb.jpg

Dj Rudy

11-22-2005, 11:54 PM

740 ln2 cooled
2x256 bh5 5/4

http://www.hwtweakers.net/files/forum/0509/dscf0400.jpg

Bogi

11-23-2005, 12:08 AM

here my 1m time on air (http://home.arcor.de/16vbogi/screens/3205mhz%2022,969sec%20780.JPG)

Digg

11-23-2005, 03:57 PM

my best results on air with abit an8 ultra:

1M
http://mitglied.lycos.de/meinnamegehtnicht/144er%20Opteron/3025mhz%20pi1m.JPG

32M
http://mitglied.lycos.de/meinnamegehtnicht/144er%20Opteron/3001%201.65v%20pi1m.JPG

OverVoltage

12-04-2005, 09:04 PM

http://www.geocities.com/danielmckimmie@sbcglobal.net/img/PI.jpg

funkflix

12-23-2005, 12:21 PM

http://213.202.211.105/gravedigga/0546GPAW/25.313.jpg

Shark-357

12-24-2005, 09:12 PM

My best Spi 1M so far
cpu is water cooled ambient temperature was 3°C
http://img277.imageshack.us/img277/1411/opterohn3261mhz8wi.jpg

oktavius

03-10-2006, 01:39 PM

my best SuperPI is

with a 780ES @ 3080Mhz with watercooling
P4C800-E DLX full modded

http://gm.pc-modz.de/hwl/superpi_780_3080_257_1.575_24.812sec.JPG

24.812sec ;)

oktavius

03-10-2006, 03:37 PM

now with my cheep Celeron-M 380

1600Mhz @ 2600 16x163 default vcore with asus stock air cooling ;)
P4C800-E DLX full modded
CT479 full modded
http://gm.pc-modz.de/spi/superpi_380_2616_163.5_1.3.JPG

Nitrogenium

03-17-2006, 11:51 AM

CPU Intel P4 Northwood 2800@4583 +dry ice
Asus P4P800SE Gold
Winbond BH-5 2*256Mb@218MHz@3.2V
OCZ DDR Booster
31.641s
http://images.people.overclockers.ru/63519.jpg

C_B

03-24-2006, 10:20 AM

a cheap M725 ...and a really good M750
both with air cooling ...

http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/data/500/14281M725_2.jpg

http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/data/500/14281SNAG-0015_1.jpg

Dj Rudy

04-27-2006, 01:32 AM

p4 631 ln2 cooled
Asus p5wd2-e full mod chipset ln2 cooled
pc power&cooling 1 KW
2x1gb Ocz ddr2 PC8000 xtc gold @ 2.4v
virge s3 pci
s.o. win 2003 server lite

http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/3931/pi1M_xs.jpg

before

05-22-2006, 12:47 PM

So, I've played a little bit more with this 3700+ after a week end spent working on the AMD WR.

http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/2008/ccbwe0544vpmw310spi1m24s6882on.jpg

... & Smallest clock to get into 24s (this run was done last week)

http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/1402/ccbwe0544vpmw310spi1m24sgp29xe.jpg

Hystrix^

05-23-2006, 08:31 AM

Very nice score, but what is MPS Multi CPU enable?
Grtz

before

05-23-2006, 10:46 AM

Thx mate! These are drivers for mutliprocessors plateforms; when enable with single core processor they give extra heat load to fight cold-bug. ;)

Hystrix^

05-24-2006, 08:25 PM

Ok, thx

VL125

12-20-2006, 04:23 PM

Max possible, this was made by stunned guy with my Hardware. The Board is the bottleneck, the cpu could do more than this.
E6400, P5B Deluxe wifi, 2gig Cellshock Ram, ice-man vapo lets rock.
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/3016/e6400422528ddr2lk0.jpg

Punisher!

02-02-2007, 01:41 AM

Link does not work anymore.

funkflix

02-02-2007, 01:45 AM

http://www.xtremesystems.org/pi

IndianScout

02-18-2007, 03:50 PM

first run..

http://www.bfroe.com/superpimod.JPG

foch3 -USA-

03-19-2007, 12:11 PM

I am having an issue with superpi mod and I don't know were to ask it so I will just ask it here.

When my e6600 is clocked at 3600mhz in vista 64 the program stops working and reports this:
APPCRASH
Application Name: super_pi_mod.exe
Application Version: 0.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 624c1f35
Fault Module Name: StackHash_75cc
Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 00000000
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Offset: 3fffffff
OS Version: 6.0.6000.2.0.0.256.1
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 75cc
Additional Information 2: 2419b6ea3c5d39ffac9575d4d53aeee6
Additional Information 3: a255
Additional Information 4: 83da4b4ca49b738b489e75545f1cdf05

The overclock is stable as far as I can tell, 9hrs+ Orthos small FFT priority 9 and runs superpi non mod 32m flawlessly. What am I doing wrong? does it think I am cheating. Is their any difference between superpi and pi mod that would stress the memory differently?

hifiking

03-24-2007, 09:04 AM

I can't finish 32M in Vista either, even on stock specs. I runs every other bench fine. Is this a Vista error, SuperPi or my PC?

Crankybugga

03-31-2007, 04:39 AM

I can't finish 32M in Vista either, even on stock specs. I runs every other bench fine. Is this a Vista error, SuperPi or my PC?
I think its vista. awaiting mod 1.6 :confused:

kamuiGT

05-23-2007, 05:39 PM

safan80

05-25-2007, 12:36 AM

no problems in running superpi mod 1.5 here under vista x64

zodden

06-07-2007, 12:33 AM

Super Pi crashes for me in Vista 64 too. I'm just sticking to ORTHOS for now.

Crashes for me too. No problem on XP though. Can run dual 32M on XP but can't even finish one 32M on Vista 64. System is orthos stable and memtest stable too at the settings in my sig.

I clocked down to stock and it still stoped responding

foch3 -USA-

06-07-2007, 07:17 PM

Maybe it's something to do with p965 chipset and vista? Its weird because it doesn't give a not exact in round like it would if their was an instability. It just says application has stopped or something like that. Maybe the Mod considers something the p965 is doing a cheat. This is interesting, So can you guys with problems run superpi non mod just fine?

Cybertronic

07-17-2007, 11:00 AM

Crashes for me as well in Windows Vista X64 Business Edition. It says application has stopped working and sometimes I can get a successful run in 1M however most of the time it just crashes :(

Aldy402

07-25-2007, 08:49 PM

me too , i think its P965 chipset in vista

sobol

08-07-2007, 03:48 PM

I've got exactly same error. My thread about that is here:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=154295

I am having an issue with superpi mod and I don't know were to ask it so I will just ask it here.

When my e6600 is clocked at 3600mhz in vista 64 the program stops working and reports this:
APPCRASH
Application Name: super_pi_mod.exe
Application Version: 0.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 624c1f35
Fault Module Name: StackHash_75cc
Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 00000000
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Offset: 3fffffff
OS Version: 6.0.6000.2.0.0.256.1
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 75cc
Additional Information 2: 2419b6ea3c5d39ffac9575d4d53aeee6
Additional Information 3: a255
Additional Information 4: 83da4b4ca49b738b489e75545f1cdf05

The overclock is stable as far as I can tell, 9hrs+ Orthos small FFT priority 9 and runs superpi non mod 32m flawlessly. What am I doing wrong? does it think I am cheating. Is their any difference between superpi and pi mod that would stress the memory differently?

Aldy402

08-15-2007, 05:35 AM

has the bug been confirmed??

that 32m test wont complete under p965 chipsets in windows vista?

spectrum48

08-15-2007, 01:47 PM

i had the same problem BOTH with p5b deluxe + p5k in vista 64

mup0

08-27-2007, 11:39 AM

mee too...vista 64 cant finish 32mb super Pi... :(

sobol

09-03-2007, 10:07 AM

foch3 -USA-

09-03-2007, 11:10 AM

That did not work for me, It was worth a shot though thanks.

sobol

09-03-2007, 02:22 PM

That did not work for me, It was worth a shot though thanks.

In my case SuperPI exit even on stock speed/voltage. Is yours as well ?

If not maybe OC is the reason. Otherwise try to boot up into Safe Mod and run SuperPI. If it will work this time it means its something in your system.

I had Audigy sound driver causing it. My "Windows Audio" service is on now while driver isn't installed and SuperPI works fine.
Last step for me is to find properly working driver.

sean222

09-18-2007, 12:43 PM

Guys
I think I've found what's causing these errors.
I've got solution which is far from being perfect.
Please try turning off Audio services in Vista ( start> run> services.msc, find Windows Audio on the list , double click and stop it ).

After this run Super PI and please post the result here.

Wow! I temporarily stopped the Windows Audio and Windows Audio Endpoint Builder services, and SuperPi ran flawlessly! Thanks!

I break the 13s in Windows XP, but not Vista x64 :(

sobol

09-26-2007, 12:38 PM

To those who wants to disable sound just for SuperPI and then quickly turn it on. Create two .bat files on the desktop

SoundOff.bat:
net stop "AudioSrv"

and

SoundOn.bat:
net start "AudioSrv"

Viola

Calmatory

01-23-2008, 06:46 AM

Where I can download this nowadays? xtremesystems.com seems to be unresponding. :(

Never ever format your harddrives without taking copies of benchmarking stuff...

StiG_NWG

01-31-2008, 10:10 AM

Q6600 2400@3734MHz (http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=305800), 1.529v, TT Big Typ 120VX
ASUS P5B DLX, BIOS v.1215
3Gb DDR-2, 333@415MHz, 5-5-5-15 2T
SuperPi mod1.5 XS, 1M = 13.984

http://ipicture.ru/uploads/080131/thumbs/2q6V1SuTGl.jpg (http://ipicture.ru/Gallery/Viewfull/442648.html)

Des1gnR

02-11-2008, 05:26 AM

Gigabyte 965P-S3
Intel Core2Duo E6700@3,8Ghz
2×1GB/760 (4-4-4-6) Micron D9DQW
SuperPi: 13,532 (http://kepfeltoltes.pirateclub.hu/pics/superpi33.JPG)

DrSlump

04-26-2008, 12:37 AM

I guys, i'm aving some problems with superpi-mod.
Running 32M i get not-exact in round. The system gives no error with original super-pi (either running 4 threads togheter) and any other testing programs.
Only superpi-mod gives me problems, any explanation?
My system:
Asus p5w dh deluxe + q6600 + 4gb ram + 1TByte raid hd + x1900xt + Enermax elt500awt + Windows XP Pro X64.

Thanx ;)

grungero

07-21-2008, 05:59 AM

I'm using Vista Ultimate SP1 and always having error/failed when running 32m even in stock settings. Help me please! :(

decayed.cell

10-12-2008, 12:47 AM

Bit of a thread revival, same problem here on Vista x64 SP1, and for the loops that do pass I'm failing the validation. Funnily enough 1.4 works fine, and so does the original 1.1e

Jimbo Mahoney

12-17-2008, 06:06 AM

Interestingly I decided to use this SuperPi mod too and it gives errors at stock - Vista 64 SP1.

Large FFTs in Orthos are fine...

EDIT - Seems there are some compatibility issues:

http://files.extremeoverclocking.com/file.php?f=211

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/245640-11-prime95-stable-super-fails-test-vista-solution-inside

decayed.cell

12-17-2008, 03:58 PM

Yeah its kind of annoying. Hyper PI? Good find I might try that now

poke349

04-21-2009, 11:30 AM

May I suggest a new program?

SuperPi is getting outdated because it's slow and single-threaded.

Here's the main thread about it:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=221773

y-cruncher is faster than SuperPi, and PiFast. And most importantly, it is multi-threaded and has built in benchmark validation and anti-cheat protection.

On Dual-Harpertowns, y-cruncher can compute 1 billion digits of Pi before SuperPi can finish 32m...