mistake on the ocz site..

[aCidbAbY]

tell me what you guys think is wrong with this pic:) :stick:
its from the hall of fame on the OCz site...lol 4th one down.

http://www.ocztechnology.com/products/hall_of_fame/

[CTKP]

.5 multi......

[BeSaiD]

lol, thats a 283*8/9= 251 mhz... :P It's a normal result... xD

[MarilynMX]

guys didnt realize the .5 multi trick at that moment...but some people say half mult is considerable

[krampak]

BeSaiD, it's 263Mhz, not 251. (CPU Speed / 9).

[aCidbAbY]

i'll let ANDY know roflmfao

[D_o_S]

What's wrong with 8.5 multi?

[SlackeR]

The ramspeed is reported wron on half multis.
For example:
250x9.5=2375
BUT the ram will be run like off the next whole multi, 10:
2375/10=237mhz
no programs see this, so it looks cool when you OC on half multis ;)

[aCidbAbY]

no it looks dumb because you are advertising a clock that is not possible;) 283@ 2-2-2-5 yeah right 3.4 vdimm

[SlackeR]

no it looks dumb because you are advertising a clock that is not possible;) 283@ 2-2-2-5 yeah right 3.4 vdimm

ok looked then ;)
:toast:

[enzoR]

yea

[D_o_S]

Thanks for explaining :)

[Rabbi_NZ]

Saw that a while back but didn't bother saying anything... good on ya for telling them aCidbAbY

[bias_hjorth]

Yeah nice joob :)
Although as earlier described some of the results are very old :)

[bias_hjorth]

Yeah it was impressive at the time - Anyone was "fooled" by the results including mr.ice (I think) - But we got smarter :)

*edit never the less its still a nice result !