View Full Version : BH-5: CORSAIR 3200LLPT vs. MUSHKIN LEVEL II 3500
HARDCORECLOCKER
01-21-2005, 03:14 PM
:D First the CORSAIR:
http://de.geocities.com/hardcoreclocker/Corsair275.JPG
And now the MUSHKIN:
http://de.geocities.com/hardcoreclocker/Mushkin275.JPG
Both with 3,9 Vdimm - bandwith of MUSHKIN is a little lower - MUSHKIN can't be tweaked with the A64 tweaker as much as CORSAIR.
But 3,9 volts for 24/7 use is very much.
:toast:
sparkie34
01-21-2005, 03:20 PM
Links aren't working for me :-\
HARDCORECLOCKER
01-21-2005, 03:22 PM
Links aren't working for me :-\
:confused: Try again or wait a bit - I can still see 'em.
:toast:
sparkie34
01-21-2005, 04:19 PM
I can see them now. Nice results!
Playful_Buffalo
01-21-2005, 10:44 PM
^ werd
justwOo
01-22-2005, 12:46 AM
Very nice indeed
bh-5 still amazes me after all this time :P
enzoR
01-22-2005, 02:52 AM
i cant see it :(
mushk1n
01-22-2005, 02:59 AM
my bh-5 doesnt wanna work for me :( not even 230 2-3-3-6.. just craps out after 8% of memtest
enzoR
01-22-2005, 03:09 AM
how much voltage are you feeding it? :stick:
how much voltage are you feeding it? :stick:
Both with 3,9 Vdimm - bandwith of MUSHKIN is a little lower - MUSHKIN can't be tweaked with the A64 tweaker as much as CORSAIR.
But 3,9 volts for 24/7 use is very much.
:toast:
:stick: :D
Can you do a SuperPi 1M run again with processtimer running on both Corsair and Mushkin?
That will reveal the difference, after all, 25 seconds is 25 seconds and doesn't show any difference.
Process timer will show 25,xxx instead of just 25 seconds.
A compare to TCCD will be something a lot of us are waiting for. ;)
enzoR
01-22-2005, 03:42 AM
my bh-5 doesnt wanna work for me :( not even 230 2-3-3-6.. just craps out after 8% of memtest
lol zeus... too early in the morning huh? :D :stick: :toast:
iddqd
01-22-2005, 09:28 AM
You mean Corsair XMS3500LLPT? the 3200 are supposed to be BH-6, not BH-5.
skate2snow
01-22-2005, 01:09 PM
At this point, I think we should be able to call mnix BH5 and BH6. At least, someone shouldn't be called wrong for that....
iddqd
01-22-2005, 01:12 PM
BH-5 typically has ~10MHz headroom over BH-6 voltage per voltage.
skate2snow
01-22-2005, 02:05 PM
Actually, BH6 overclock a little better... Because BH5 is 5ns, so a little tighter, and BH6 is 6ns, so a little looser. But the difference is almost none. So BH6 is actually better. But the differences are so slim that, again, I dont think someone should be called wrong if he says BH5 for generalizing BH5/BH6....
enzoR
01-22-2005, 02:35 PM
what do you mean a little tighter a little looser. LOL... 5ns means its rated for 200mhz and 6ns means 166mhz. they get speed binned and the good ones become 5ns. contrary to what some people think that BH6 uses a bigger manufacturing process all Winbond B dies use 0.18, C dies use 0.13 and the new Infineon/UTT 0.09.
skate2snow
01-22-2005, 02:47 PM
It is possible that I misunderstood this. But from what I seen, the average of BH6 is higher then BH5....
HARDCORECLOCKER
01-22-2005, 03:46 PM
You mean Corsair XMS3500LLPT? the 3200 are supposed to be BH-6, not BH-5.
:D 3500LLPT does't exist.
BH-5: 3500C2 rev. 1.1 (there is no other rev. for 3500) and 3200LL / 3200LLPT rev 1.1
@Zeus: No need to - You can see it in the bandwith. Compare it to TCCD with SANDRA MEMbench if You like.
:toast: